{"title":"在AUTOSAR/OSEK平台上使用本机非抢占组的可调度性","authors":"L. Hatvani, R. J. Bril","doi":"10.23919/DATE.2017.7926990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To combine the relative strengths of fully preemptive and non-preemptive fixed priority scheduling, we can use limited preemptive scheduling methods. One such method is fixed-priority threshold scheduling (FPTS). This approach defines dual priorities for every task, a priority assigned to the inactive jobs and an equal or a higher one, called preemption threshold, for the jobs that have already started executing. A task can preempt another task's job if and only if its priority is greater than the other task's preemption threshold. FPTS can be implemented by assigning tasks to non-preemptive groups in a one-to-many manner. That is groups of tasks that are mutually non-preemptive.","PeriodicalId":6862,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schedulability using native non-preemptive groups on an AUTOSAR/OSEK platform\",\"authors\":\"L. Hatvani, R. J. Bril\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/DATE.2017.7926990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To combine the relative strengths of fully preemptive and non-preemptive fixed priority scheduling, we can use limited preemptive scheduling methods. One such method is fixed-priority threshold scheduling (FPTS). This approach defines dual priorities for every task, a priority assigned to the inactive jobs and an equal or a higher one, called preemption threshold, for the jobs that have already started executing. A task can preempt another task's job if and only if its priority is greater than the other task's preemption threshold. FPTS can be implemented by assigning tasks to non-preemptive groups in a one-to-many manner. That is groups of tasks that are mutually non-preemptive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2017.7926990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2017.7926990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Schedulability using native non-preemptive groups on an AUTOSAR/OSEK platform
To combine the relative strengths of fully preemptive and non-preemptive fixed priority scheduling, we can use limited preemptive scheduling methods. One such method is fixed-priority threshold scheduling (FPTS). This approach defines dual priorities for every task, a priority assigned to the inactive jobs and an equal or a higher one, called preemption threshold, for the jobs that have already started executing. A task can preempt another task's job if and only if its priority is greater than the other task's preemption threshold. FPTS can be implemented by assigning tasks to non-preemptive groups in a one-to-many manner. That is groups of tasks that are mutually non-preemptive.