孕二、晚期超声评估双顶骨直径和股骨长度对胎龄的比较

Farjana Akther, Borhan Uddin, Ms Ahmed, Kazi Nazma Begum, N. Akhter, Shiren Sultana, M. A. Wahab, T. A. Nila, Md Mahbubur Rahman Shaheen, R. B. Habib
{"title":"孕二、晚期超声评估双顶骨直径和股骨长度对胎龄的比较","authors":"Farjana Akther, Borhan Uddin, Ms Ahmed, Kazi Nazma Begum, N. Akhter, Shiren Sultana, M. A. Wahab, T. A. Nila, Md Mahbubur Rahman Shaheen, R. B. Habib","doi":"10.3329/bmj.v49i3.56080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the gestational period, fetal biometrics are assessed through ultrasonography to observe the growth of the fetus. This study observed the corresponding of gestational age those were measured by two of the fetal diameters; gestational age were calculated from history of last menstrual period (LMP), in the last two trimesters. This descriptive type of observational study was carried out in the Department of Radiology and Imaging of Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, during the period of July, 2004 to June, 2005. Here 291 single-ton, non-complicated pregnant women of LMP were selected purposively from valid record. Bi-parietal diameter (BPD) and femoral length (FL) estimated through ultrasonography. These two parameters compared with the gestational age in second and third trimester. The study found that, before 36th week, the BPD based gestational age varied 2 to 3 days from LMP based gestational age and after that, the variation was 1 to 4 weeks. In case of FL, the ultrasonic measurement found to be 2 to 4 days backward in the second trimester and 2 to 3 days advance in the last trimester in contrast to the LMP based gestational age. In the second trimester, it has been found that, BPD has been the superior predictor of the gestational age than the FL with the correlation coefficient of 0.999 in case of BPD and 0.998 in case of FL when correlated with LMP based gestational age. Although, in third trimester, FL versus BPD predicted the gestational age with a correlation coefficient of 0.998 versus 0.978 respectively, when correlated with gestational age based on the history of LMP. This study has observed that, later in pregnancy, FL has the better predictability over BPD to determine the gestational age. \nBangladesh Med J. 2020 Sept; 49(3) : 43-48","PeriodicalId":8711,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Ultrasonic Evaluation of Bi-Parietal Diameter and Femoral Length in 2nd and 3rd Trimester to Estimate the Gestational Age\",\"authors\":\"Farjana Akther, Borhan Uddin, Ms Ahmed, Kazi Nazma Begum, N. Akhter, Shiren Sultana, M. A. Wahab, T. A. Nila, Md Mahbubur Rahman Shaheen, R. B. Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bmj.v49i3.56080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the gestational period, fetal biometrics are assessed through ultrasonography to observe the growth of the fetus. This study observed the corresponding of gestational age those were measured by two of the fetal diameters; gestational age were calculated from history of last menstrual period (LMP), in the last two trimesters. This descriptive type of observational study was carried out in the Department of Radiology and Imaging of Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, during the period of July, 2004 to June, 2005. Here 291 single-ton, non-complicated pregnant women of LMP were selected purposively from valid record. Bi-parietal diameter (BPD) and femoral length (FL) estimated through ultrasonography. These two parameters compared with the gestational age in second and third trimester. The study found that, before 36th week, the BPD based gestational age varied 2 to 3 days from LMP based gestational age and after that, the variation was 1 to 4 weeks. In case of FL, the ultrasonic measurement found to be 2 to 4 days backward in the second trimester and 2 to 3 days advance in the last trimester in contrast to the LMP based gestational age. In the second trimester, it has been found that, BPD has been the superior predictor of the gestational age than the FL with the correlation coefficient of 0.999 in case of BPD and 0.998 in case of FL when correlated with LMP based gestational age. Although, in third trimester, FL versus BPD predicted the gestational age with a correlation coefficient of 0.998 versus 0.978 respectively, when correlated with gestational age based on the history of LMP. This study has observed that, later in pregnancy, FL has the better predictability over BPD to determine the gestational age. \\nBangladesh Med J. 2020 Sept; 49(3) : 43-48\",\"PeriodicalId\":8711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v49i3.56080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v49i3.56080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在妊娠期,通过超声检查胎儿生物特征,观察胎儿的生长情况。本研究观察了胎龄与胎径测定的对应关系;根据最后两个月的末次月经史(LMP)计算胎龄。这项描述性观察性研究于2004年7月至2005年6月在达卡医学院和医院放射学和影像科进行。本研究有目的地从有效记录中选取291例单吨、无并发症的LMP孕妇。通过超声估计双顶骨直径(BPD)和股骨长度(FL)。这两个参数与妊娠中期和晚期的胎龄比较。研究发现,36周之前,基于BPD的胎龄与基于LMP的胎龄相差2 - 3天,36周之后,差异为1 - 4周。在FL的情况下,超声测量发现在孕中期向后2至4天,在孕晚期提前2至3天,与基于LMP的胎龄相比。在妊娠中期,BPD对胎龄的预测优于FL, BPD与基于LMP的胎龄相关系数分别为0.999和0.998。然而,在妊娠晚期,FL与BPD预测胎龄的相关系数分别为0.998和0.978,当基于LMP病史与胎龄相关时。本研究观察到,在妊娠后期,FL比BPD有更好的可预测性来确定胎龄。孟加拉国Med . 2020年9月;49(3): 43-48
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Ultrasonic Evaluation of Bi-Parietal Diameter and Femoral Length in 2nd and 3rd Trimester to Estimate the Gestational Age
During the gestational period, fetal biometrics are assessed through ultrasonography to observe the growth of the fetus. This study observed the corresponding of gestational age those were measured by two of the fetal diameters; gestational age were calculated from history of last menstrual period (LMP), in the last two trimesters. This descriptive type of observational study was carried out in the Department of Radiology and Imaging of Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, during the period of July, 2004 to June, 2005. Here 291 single-ton, non-complicated pregnant women of LMP were selected purposively from valid record. Bi-parietal diameter (BPD) and femoral length (FL) estimated through ultrasonography. These two parameters compared with the gestational age in second and third trimester. The study found that, before 36th week, the BPD based gestational age varied 2 to 3 days from LMP based gestational age and after that, the variation was 1 to 4 weeks. In case of FL, the ultrasonic measurement found to be 2 to 4 days backward in the second trimester and 2 to 3 days advance in the last trimester in contrast to the LMP based gestational age. In the second trimester, it has been found that, BPD has been the superior predictor of the gestational age than the FL with the correlation coefficient of 0.999 in case of BPD and 0.998 in case of FL when correlated with LMP based gestational age. Although, in third trimester, FL versus BPD predicted the gestational age with a correlation coefficient of 0.998 versus 0.978 respectively, when correlated with gestational age based on the history of LMP. This study has observed that, later in pregnancy, FL has the better predictability over BPD to determine the gestational age. Bangladesh Med J. 2020 Sept; 49(3) : 43-48
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信