为猪群开发简化的农场动物健康和福利基准工具

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
K. Wadepohl, T. Blaha, L. V. Gompel, A. S. Duarte, C. L. Nielsen, H. Saatkamp, J. Wagenaar, D. Meemken, H. Graveland, H. Schmitt, D. Heederik, R. Luiken, D. Mevius, A. Essen, B. González-Zorn, G. Moyano, P. Saunders, C. Chauvin, J. David, A. Battisti, A. Caprioli, J. Dewulf, M. Brandt, F. Aarestrup, T. Hald, D. Wasyl, M. Skarżyńska, M. Zając, H. Daskalov, K. Staerk, Effort Grp
{"title":"为猪群开发简化的农场动物健康和福利基准工具","authors":"K. Wadepohl, T. Blaha, L. V. Gompel, A. S. Duarte, C. L. Nielsen, H. Saatkamp, J. Wagenaar, D. Meemken, H. Graveland, H. Schmitt, D. Heederik, R. Luiken, D. Mevius, A. Essen, B. González-Zorn, G. Moyano, P. Saunders, C. Chauvin, J. David, A. Battisti, A. Caprioli, J. Dewulf, M. Brandt, F. Aarestrup, T. Hald, D. Wasyl, M. Skarżyńska, M. Zając, H. Daskalov, K. Staerk, Effort Grp","doi":"10.2376/0005-9366-18088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Animal health and welfare have become topics of increasing public interest. Especially improvements in the health and welfare of food-producing animals are currently being intensively researched. To be able to routinely assess the quality of health and welfare of individual pig herds for benchmarking purposes in a simple and robust way, a short and easy to use measuring tool is needed. \nSince the very elaborate assessment tools of the Welfare Quality (R) (WQ) project (FOOD-CT-2004-506508) are too time-consuming for an assessment during a regular veterinary herd visit, easy to record indicators were targetly selected and supplemented by new elements in order to combine a number of measurements in one indicator, using the theoretical concept of iceberg indicators, which are thought to trigger further scrutiny into the management of pig herds that reveal potential deficiencies. \nThe thus created simplified Herd Health and Welfare Index (HHWI) shows a theoretical range of 10 (very good) to a maximum of 30 (very bad) index points. It has been demonstrated that it can be used as an animal welfare measurement tool to compare herds within a group of pig herds that are measured by the same set of criteria. The HHWI has proven to be a rough, semi-quantitative, and a less elaborate tool than, for example, the complete protocol of the WQ-project. All in all, the HHWI has a broader range of application possibilities than the WQ-protocol due to its reduced number of criteria for the assessment of the health and welfare status of pig herds.","PeriodicalId":8761,"journal":{"name":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a simplified on-farm animal health and welfare benchmarking tool for pig herds\",\"authors\":\"K. Wadepohl, T. Blaha, L. V. Gompel, A. S. Duarte, C. L. Nielsen, H. Saatkamp, J. Wagenaar, D. Meemken, H. Graveland, H. Schmitt, D. Heederik, R. Luiken, D. Mevius, A. Essen, B. González-Zorn, G. Moyano, P. Saunders, C. Chauvin, J. David, A. Battisti, A. Caprioli, J. Dewulf, M. Brandt, F. Aarestrup, T. Hald, D. Wasyl, M. Skarżyńska, M. Zając, H. Daskalov, K. Staerk, Effort Grp\",\"doi\":\"10.2376/0005-9366-18088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Animal health and welfare have become topics of increasing public interest. Especially improvements in the health and welfare of food-producing animals are currently being intensively researched. To be able to routinely assess the quality of health and welfare of individual pig herds for benchmarking purposes in a simple and robust way, a short and easy to use measuring tool is needed. \\nSince the very elaborate assessment tools of the Welfare Quality (R) (WQ) project (FOOD-CT-2004-506508) are too time-consuming for an assessment during a regular veterinary herd visit, easy to record indicators were targetly selected and supplemented by new elements in order to combine a number of measurements in one indicator, using the theoretical concept of iceberg indicators, which are thought to trigger further scrutiny into the management of pig herds that reveal potential deficiencies. \\nThe thus created simplified Herd Health and Welfare Index (HHWI) shows a theoretical range of 10 (very good) to a maximum of 30 (very bad) index points. It has been demonstrated that it can be used as an animal welfare measurement tool to compare herds within a group of pig herds that are measured by the same set of criteria. The HHWI has proven to be a rough, semi-quantitative, and a less elaborate tool than, for example, the complete protocol of the WQ-project. All in all, the HHWI has a broader range of application possibilities than the WQ-protocol due to its reduced number of criteria for the assessment of the health and welfare status of pig herds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-18088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-18088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

动物健康和福利已成为公众日益关注的话题。特别是目前正在深入研究如何改善食用动物的健康和福利。为了能够以一种简单而有力的方式对单个猪群的健康和福利质量进行常规评估,需要一种简短且易于使用的测量工具。由于福利质量(R) (WQ)项目(FOOD-CT-2004-506508)非常复杂的评估工具在定期兽医群访问期间进行评估过于耗时,因此有针对性地选择易于记录的指标并补充新元素,以便使用冰山指标的理论概念将多个测量结合在一个指标中,这被认为会引发对猪群管理的进一步审查,从而发现潜在的缺陷。由此创建的简化畜群健康和福利指数(HHWI)显示了一个理论范围,从10(非常好)到最多30(非常差)指数点。已经证明,它可以作为一种动物福利测量工具,用于比较由同一套标准测量的一组猪群中的猪群。事实证明,与wq项目的完整协议相比,HHWI是一个粗糙的、半定量的、不那么复杂的工具。总而言之,由于减少了评估猪群健康和福利状况的准则,“卫生健康工作指南”比“卫生健康工作指南”的应用范围更广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a simplified on-farm animal health and welfare benchmarking tool for pig herds
Animal health and welfare have become topics of increasing public interest. Especially improvements in the health and welfare of food-producing animals are currently being intensively researched. To be able to routinely assess the quality of health and welfare of individual pig herds for benchmarking purposes in a simple and robust way, a short and easy to use measuring tool is needed. Since the very elaborate assessment tools of the Welfare Quality (R) (WQ) project (FOOD-CT-2004-506508) are too time-consuming for an assessment during a regular veterinary herd visit, easy to record indicators were targetly selected and supplemented by new elements in order to combine a number of measurements in one indicator, using the theoretical concept of iceberg indicators, which are thought to trigger further scrutiny into the management of pig herds that reveal potential deficiencies. The thus created simplified Herd Health and Welfare Index (HHWI) shows a theoretical range of 10 (very good) to a maximum of 30 (very bad) index points. It has been demonstrated that it can be used as an animal welfare measurement tool to compare herds within a group of pig herds that are measured by the same set of criteria. The HHWI has proven to be a rough, semi-quantitative, and a less elaborate tool than, for example, the complete protocol of the WQ-project. All in all, the HHWI has a broader range of application possibilities than the WQ-protocol due to its reduced number of criteria for the assessment of the health and welfare status of pig herds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of veterinary public health and its related subjects, such as epidemiology, bacteriology, virology, pathology, immunology, parasitology, and mycology. The journal publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies and short communications on farm animals, companion animals, equines, wild animals and laboratory animals. In addition, the editors regularly commission special issues on topics of major importance. The journal’s articles are published either in German or English and always include an abstract in the other language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信