{"title":"ArrayNet:用于阵列处理管道的地震相位分类和反向方位回归神经网络","authors":"A. Köhler, E. B. Myklebust","doi":"10.1785/0120230056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Array processing is an integral part of automatic seismic event detection pipelines for measuring apparent velocity and backazimuth of seismic arrivals. Both quantities are usually measured under the plane-wave assumption, and are essential to classify the phase type and to determine the direction toward the event epicenter. However, structural inhomogeneities can lead to deviations from the plane-wave model, which must be taken into account for phase classification and back-azimuth estimation. We suggest a combined classification and regression neural network, which we call ArrayNet, to determine the phase type and backazimuth directly from the arrival-time differences between all combinations of stations of a given seismic array without assuming a plane-wave model. ArrayNet is trained using regional P- and S-wave arrivals of over 30,000 seismic events from reviewed regional bulletins in northern Europe from the past three decades. ArrayNet models are generated and trained for each of the ARCES, FINES, and SPITS seismic arrays. We observe excellent performance for the seismic phase classification (up to 99% accuracy), and the derived back-azimuth residuals are significantly improved in comparison with traditional array processing results using the plane-wave assumption. The SPITS array in Svalbard exhibits particular issues when it comes to array processing in the form of high apparent seismic velocities and a multitude of frost quake signals inside the array, and we show how our new approach better handles these obstacles. Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of ArrayNet on 20 months of continuous phase detections from the ARCES array and investigate the results for a selection of regional seismic events of interest. Our results demonstrate that automatic event detection at seismic arrays can be further enhanced using a machine learning approach that takes advantage of the unique array data recorded at these stations.","PeriodicalId":9444,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ArrayNet: A Combined Seismic Phase Classification and Back-Azimuth Regression Neural Network for Array Processing Pipelines\",\"authors\":\"A. Köhler, E. B. Myklebust\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0120230056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Array processing is an integral part of automatic seismic event detection pipelines for measuring apparent velocity and backazimuth of seismic arrivals. Both quantities are usually measured under the plane-wave assumption, and are essential to classify the phase type and to determine the direction toward the event epicenter. However, structural inhomogeneities can lead to deviations from the plane-wave model, which must be taken into account for phase classification and back-azimuth estimation. We suggest a combined classification and regression neural network, which we call ArrayNet, to determine the phase type and backazimuth directly from the arrival-time differences between all combinations of stations of a given seismic array without assuming a plane-wave model. ArrayNet is trained using regional P- and S-wave arrivals of over 30,000 seismic events from reviewed regional bulletins in northern Europe from the past three decades. ArrayNet models are generated and trained for each of the ARCES, FINES, and SPITS seismic arrays. We observe excellent performance for the seismic phase classification (up to 99% accuracy), and the derived back-azimuth residuals are significantly improved in comparison with traditional array processing results using the plane-wave assumption. The SPITS array in Svalbard exhibits particular issues when it comes to array processing in the form of high apparent seismic velocities and a multitude of frost quake signals inside the array, and we show how our new approach better handles these obstacles. Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of ArrayNet on 20 months of continuous phase detections from the ARCES array and investigate the results for a selection of regional seismic events of interest. Our results demonstrate that automatic event detection at seismic arrays can be further enhanced using a machine learning approach that takes advantage of the unique array data recorded at these stations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
ArrayNet: A Combined Seismic Phase Classification and Back-Azimuth Regression Neural Network for Array Processing Pipelines
Array processing is an integral part of automatic seismic event detection pipelines for measuring apparent velocity and backazimuth of seismic arrivals. Both quantities are usually measured under the plane-wave assumption, and are essential to classify the phase type and to determine the direction toward the event epicenter. However, structural inhomogeneities can lead to deviations from the plane-wave model, which must be taken into account for phase classification and back-azimuth estimation. We suggest a combined classification and regression neural network, which we call ArrayNet, to determine the phase type and backazimuth directly from the arrival-time differences between all combinations of stations of a given seismic array without assuming a plane-wave model. ArrayNet is trained using regional P- and S-wave arrivals of over 30,000 seismic events from reviewed regional bulletins in northern Europe from the past three decades. ArrayNet models are generated and trained for each of the ARCES, FINES, and SPITS seismic arrays. We observe excellent performance for the seismic phase classification (up to 99% accuracy), and the derived back-azimuth residuals are significantly improved in comparison with traditional array processing results using the plane-wave assumption. The SPITS array in Svalbard exhibits particular issues when it comes to array processing in the form of high apparent seismic velocities and a multitude of frost quake signals inside the array, and we show how our new approach better handles these obstacles. Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of ArrayNet on 20 months of continuous phase detections from the ARCES array and investigate the results for a selection of regional seismic events of interest. Our results demonstrate that automatic event detection at seismic arrays can be further enhanced using a machine learning approach that takes advantage of the unique array data recorded at these stations.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, commonly referred to as BSSA, (ISSN 0037-1106) is the premier journal of advanced research in earthquake seismology and related disciplines. It first appeared in 1911 and became a bimonthly in 1963. Each issue is composed of scientific papers on the various aspects of seismology, including investigation of specific earthquakes, theoretical and observational studies of seismic waves, inverse methods for determining the structure of the Earth or the dynamics of the earthquake source, seismometry, earthquake hazard and risk estimation, seismotectonics, and earthquake engineering. Special issues focus on important earthquakes or rapidly changing topics in seismology. BSSA is published by the Seismological Society of America.