机器人辅助部分肾切除术后的单宿:双中心体验。

Q1 Medicine
U. Carbonara, Jennifer Lee, F. Crocerossa, A. Veccia, L. Hampton, D. Eun, R. Autorino
{"title":"机器人辅助部分肾切除术后的单宿:双中心体验。","authors":"U. Carbonara, Jennifer Lee, F. Crocerossa, A. Veccia, L. Hampton, D. Eun, R. Autorino","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04054-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nDespite hospital length of stay (LOS) being shorter for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared to its open counterpart, several series in the literature report on average a LOS of 2-3 days or more. We aimed to assess factors predicting a prolonged length of stay (beyond a single overnight stay) in patients undergoing RAPN.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients who underwent RAPN between 2010 and 2019 at two U.S. Centers were included and divided into two groups according to LOS: the study group included all patients who were discharged on POD1, whereas the control group included patients with LOS≥2 days. Demographics, surgical and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of LOS≥2.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 173 (60.5%) patients discharged on POD1, and 113 (39.5%) discharged on POD≥2. Patients in the study group presented a lower mean BMI (29 vs. 32, p=0.02). Retroperitoneal approach was performed in 13.3% patients with shorter LOS (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in median OT (144 vs. 168min, p=0.005) and WIT (19 vs. 23min, p=0.001). We observed six postoperative complications (3.6%) in patients discharged on POD1 and 35 (30.5%) in control group (p<0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade≥III) were observed in 3 of POD1 patients (1.8 vs. 6.1%, p<0.001). There was no difference in hospital readmission rate. On logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of prolonged LOS were OT (OR 1.01, 95%C.I.: 1.0-1.2, p=0.001), and occurrence of a postoperative complication (OR 2.2, 95%C.I. 2.0-2.5, p<0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur findings confirm that a single overnight stay after RAPN is feasible and safe. In our experience, and within the limitations of the present analysis, prolonged operative time and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications translate into higher risk of prolonged hospital stay. Besides adopting a minimally invasive approach, surgeons should also implement perioperative care pathways facilitating early discharge without increasing the risk of readmission.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single overnight stay after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a bi-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"U. Carbonara, Jennifer Lee, F. Crocerossa, A. Veccia, L. Hampton, D. Eun, R. Autorino\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04054-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nDespite hospital length of stay (LOS) being shorter for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared to its open counterpart, several series in the literature report on average a LOS of 2-3 days or more. We aimed to assess factors predicting a prolonged length of stay (beyond a single overnight stay) in patients undergoing RAPN.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nPatients who underwent RAPN between 2010 and 2019 at two U.S. Centers were included and divided into two groups according to LOS: the study group included all patients who were discharged on POD1, whereas the control group included patients with LOS≥2 days. Demographics, surgical and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of LOS≥2.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOverall, 173 (60.5%) patients discharged on POD1, and 113 (39.5%) discharged on POD≥2. Patients in the study group presented a lower mean BMI (29 vs. 32, p=0.02). Retroperitoneal approach was performed in 13.3% patients with shorter LOS (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in median OT (144 vs. 168min, p=0.005) and WIT (19 vs. 23min, p=0.001). We observed six postoperative complications (3.6%) in patients discharged on POD1 and 35 (30.5%) in control group (p<0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade≥III) were observed in 3 of POD1 patients (1.8 vs. 6.1%, p<0.001). There was no difference in hospital readmission rate. On logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of prolonged LOS were OT (OR 1.01, 95%C.I.: 1.0-1.2, p=0.001), and occurrence of a postoperative complication (OR 2.2, 95%C.I. 2.0-2.5, p<0.001).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nOur findings confirm that a single overnight stay after RAPN is feasible and safe. In our experience, and within the limitations of the present analysis, prolonged operative time and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications translate into higher risk of prolonged hospital stay. Besides adopting a minimally invasive approach, surgeons should also implement perioperative care pathways facilitating early discharge without increasing the risk of readmission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04054-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04054-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:尽管机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的住院时间(LOS)比开放式手术短,但文献中的几个系列报道平均住院时间为2-3天或更长。我们的目的是评估预测RAPN患者延长住院时间(超过一次过夜)的因素。方法纳入2010年至2019年期间在两个美国中心接受RAPN的患者,并根据LOS分为两组:研究组包括所有在POD1出院的患者,而对照组包括LOS≥2天的患者。比较两组的人口统计学、手术和围手术期结果。采用多变量logistic回归分析确定LOS≥2的独立预测因素。结果总体而言,173例(60.5%)患者在POD≥1期出院,113例(39.5%)患者在POD≥2期出院。研究组患者的平均BMI较低(29比32,p=0.02)。13.3%的短LOS患者采用后腹膜入路(p<0.001)。中位OT(144比168min, p=0.005)和WIT(19比23min, p=0.001)差异有统计学意义。术后并发症6例(3.6%),对照组35例(30.5%)(p<0.001)。3例POD1患者出现严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥III) (1.8% vs. 6.1%, p<0.001)。两组再入院率无差异。logistic回归分析显示,OT (OR 1.01, 95% ci)是延长LOS的独立预测因子。: 1.0-1.2, p=0.001),以及术后并发症的发生(OR 2.2, 95% ci。2.0 - -2.5, p < 0.001)。结论RAPN术后单夜住院是可行且安全的。根据我们的经验,在本分析的局限性内,手术时间的延长和术后即刻并发症的发生会导致住院时间延长的高风险。除了采用微创方法外,外科医生还应实施围手术期护理路径,以便在不增加再入院风险的情况下尽早出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single overnight stay after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a bi-center experience.
BACKGROUND Despite hospital length of stay (LOS) being shorter for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared to its open counterpart, several series in the literature report on average a LOS of 2-3 days or more. We aimed to assess factors predicting a prolonged length of stay (beyond a single overnight stay) in patients undergoing RAPN. METHODS Patients who underwent RAPN between 2010 and 2019 at two U.S. Centers were included and divided into two groups according to LOS: the study group included all patients who were discharged on POD1, whereas the control group included patients with LOS≥2 days. Demographics, surgical and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of LOS≥2. RESULTS Overall, 173 (60.5%) patients discharged on POD1, and 113 (39.5%) discharged on POD≥2. Patients in the study group presented a lower mean BMI (29 vs. 32, p=0.02). Retroperitoneal approach was performed in 13.3% patients with shorter LOS (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in median OT (144 vs. 168min, p=0.005) and WIT (19 vs. 23min, p=0.001). We observed six postoperative complications (3.6%) in patients discharged on POD1 and 35 (30.5%) in control group (p<0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade≥III) were observed in 3 of POD1 patients (1.8 vs. 6.1%, p<0.001). There was no difference in hospital readmission rate. On logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of prolonged LOS were OT (OR 1.01, 95%C.I.: 1.0-1.2, p=0.001), and occurrence of a postoperative complication (OR 2.2, 95%C.I. 2.0-2.5, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings confirm that a single overnight stay after RAPN is feasible and safe. In our experience, and within the limitations of the present analysis, prolonged operative time and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications translate into higher risk of prolonged hospital stay. Besides adopting a minimally invasive approach, surgeons should also implement perioperative care pathways facilitating early discharge without increasing the risk of readmission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信