天壤之别?三个欧洲国家的无神论、不可知论和人文主义世界观。

IF 2.2 1区 哲学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
T. Schnell, Elpine de Boer, H. Alma
{"title":"天壤之别?三个欧洲国家的无神论、不可知论和人文主义世界观。","authors":"T. Schnell, Elpine de Boer, H. Alma","doi":"10.1037/rel0000446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secular worldviews are widespread and growing. What are the differences between secular self-identi fi cations? This study examined if self-identi fi ed atheists, agnostics, and humanists differed systematically with regard to worldview dimensions. Cultural and gender effects were examined as secondary study objectives. A total of 1,814nonreligiousindividualsfromGermany,Austria,andtheNetherlandscompletedquestionnairesmeasuringdegreesofatheism,agnosticism,humanism,personalresponsibility,scientism,economicmaterialism,skepticism,dogmatism,existentialsearch,andconcealmentanddisclosureofconvictions.Asexpected,self-identi fi ed atheists,agnostics,andhumanistsdifferedsubstantiallyintheirworldviewpositionsandcommunication.Acrossallthreecountries,atheistsendorsedatheismtoaveryhighdegree.Comparedtoagnosticsandhumanists,they were more convinced of scientism and less of skepticism. Agnostics scored highest in agnosticism and skepticism and lowest in dogmatism. Humanists mostly held distinguishable middle positions between atheists and agnostics. Analyses of cultural differences supported the hypothesis that more religious contexts give rise to secular countermovements: In (more religious/less secular) Austria and Germany, atheism, scientism, personal responsibility, and disclosure were more pronounced than in the (secular) Netherlands, where agnosticism and skepticismweremoreprevalent.Regardinggender,menscoredhigheronatheismandscientism,andwomenon skepticism. The fi ndings suggest a continuum from decided to open secularity, two clearly distinct positions. Decided (atheist, scientist, disclosing) secularity was more common among self-identi fi ed atheists, men, and in morereligiouscontexts.Open(agnostic,skeptic)secularitywasmoreprominentamongself-identi fi edagnostics, women, and in the more secular culture. Self-identi fi ed humanists occupied a middle position.","PeriodicalId":47450,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Religion and Spirituality","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worlds apart? Atheist, agnostic, and humanist worldviews in three European countries.\",\"authors\":\"T. Schnell, Elpine de Boer, H. Alma\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/rel0000446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Secular worldviews are widespread and growing. What are the differences between secular self-identi fi cations? This study examined if self-identi fi ed atheists, agnostics, and humanists differed systematically with regard to worldview dimensions. Cultural and gender effects were examined as secondary study objectives. A total of 1,814nonreligiousindividualsfromGermany,Austria,andtheNetherlandscompletedquestionnairesmeasuringdegreesofatheism,agnosticism,humanism,personalresponsibility,scientism,economicmaterialism,skepticism,dogmatism,existentialsearch,andconcealmentanddisclosureofconvictions.Asexpected,self-identi fi ed atheists,agnostics,andhumanistsdifferedsubstantiallyintheirworldviewpositionsandcommunication.Acrossallthreecountries,atheistsendorsedatheismtoaveryhighdegree.Comparedtoagnosticsandhumanists,they were more convinced of scientism and less of skepticism. Agnostics scored highest in agnosticism and skepticism and lowest in dogmatism. Humanists mostly held distinguishable middle positions between atheists and agnostics. Analyses of cultural differences supported the hypothesis that more religious contexts give rise to secular countermovements: In (more religious/less secular) Austria and Germany, atheism, scientism, personal responsibility, and disclosure were more pronounced than in the (secular) Netherlands, where agnosticism and skepticismweremoreprevalent.Regardinggender,menscoredhigheronatheismandscientism,andwomenon skepticism. The fi ndings suggest a continuum from decided to open secularity, two clearly distinct positions. Decided (atheist, scientist, disclosing) secularity was more common among self-identi fi ed atheists, men, and in morereligiouscontexts.Open(agnostic,skeptic)secularitywasmoreprominentamongself-identi fi edagnostics, women, and in the more secular culture. Self-identi fi ed humanists occupied a middle position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Religion and Spirituality\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Religion and Spirituality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000446\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Religion and Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

世俗的世界观很普遍,而且还在不断增长。世俗的自我认同有什么不同?本研究考察了自我认同的无神论者、不可知论者和人文主义者在世界观维度上是否存在系统性差异。文化和性别的影响是次要的研究目标。共有1814名来自德国、奥地利和荷兰的非宗教人士完成了一份调查问卷,调查内容包括无神论、不可知论、人文主义、个人责任、科学主义、经济唯物主义、怀疑主义、教条主义、存在主义研究以及隐瞒和揭露信仰的程度。不出所料,自我认同的无神论者、不可知论者和人文主义者在他们的世界观、立场和交流上有很大的不同。在这三个国家中,无神论者对有神论的支持程度都很高。与不可知论者和人文主义者相比,他们更相信科学主义,更不相信怀疑主义。不可知论者在不可知论和怀疑论方面得分最高,在教条主义方面得分最低。人文主义者大多在无神论者和不可知论者之间持可区分的中间立场。对文化差异的分析支持了这样的假设,即更多的宗教背景会引发世俗的反运动:在(更宗教/更不世俗的)奥地利和德国,无神论、科学主义、个人责任和披露比(世俗的)荷兰更明显,在那里不可知论和怀疑主义更为普遍。Regardinggender、menscoredhigheronatheismandscientism andwomenon怀疑。调查结果表明,从决定到开放世俗是连续的,这是两个明显不同的立场。在自我认同的无神论者、男性和宗教背景下,“确定的(无神论者、科学家、公开的)世俗”更为普遍,而在自我认同的不可知论者、女性和更世俗的文化中,“开放的(不可知论者、怀疑论者)世俗”更为突出。自我认同的人文主义者占据了中间位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worlds apart? Atheist, agnostic, and humanist worldviews in three European countries.
Secular worldviews are widespread and growing. What are the differences between secular self-identi fi cations? This study examined if self-identi fi ed atheists, agnostics, and humanists differed systematically with regard to worldview dimensions. Cultural and gender effects were examined as secondary study objectives. A total of 1,814nonreligiousindividualsfromGermany,Austria,andtheNetherlandscompletedquestionnairesmeasuringdegreesofatheism,agnosticism,humanism,personalresponsibility,scientism,economicmaterialism,skepticism,dogmatism,existentialsearch,andconcealmentanddisclosureofconvictions.Asexpected,self-identi fi ed atheists,agnostics,andhumanistsdifferedsubstantiallyintheirworldviewpositionsandcommunication.Acrossallthreecountries,atheistsendorsedatheismtoaveryhighdegree.Comparedtoagnosticsandhumanists,they were more convinced of scientism and less of skepticism. Agnostics scored highest in agnosticism and skepticism and lowest in dogmatism. Humanists mostly held distinguishable middle positions between atheists and agnostics. Analyses of cultural differences supported the hypothesis that more religious contexts give rise to secular countermovements: In (more religious/less secular) Austria and Germany, atheism, scientism, personal responsibility, and disclosure were more pronounced than in the (secular) Netherlands, where agnosticism and skepticismweremoreprevalent.Regardinggender,menscoredhigheronatheismandscientism,andwomenon skepticism. The fi ndings suggest a continuum from decided to open secularity, two clearly distinct positions. Decided (atheist, scientist, disclosing) secularity was more common among self-identi fi ed atheists, men, and in morereligiouscontexts.Open(agnostic,skeptic)secularitywasmoreprominentamongself-identi fi edagnostics, women, and in the more secular culture. Self-identi fi ed humanists occupied a middle position.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Psychology of Religion and Spirituality ® publishes peer-reviewed, original articles related to the psychological aspects of religion and spirituality. The journal publishes articles employing experimental and correlational methods, qualitative analyses, and critical reviews of the literature. Papers evaluating clinically relevant issues surrounding training, professional development, and practice are also considered. Full length research reports, literature reviews, and brief reports are all published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信