对乳腺癌遗传风险高的女性进行单次和联合双次对比增强乳房MRI筛查的观察内一致性

C. Hugo, G. Hurtevent, S. Ferron, M. Boisserie-Lacroix, M. Longy, A. Floquet, Brouste, M. Asad-Syed
{"title":"对乳腺癌遗传风险高的女性进行单次和联合双次对比增强乳房MRI筛查的观察内一致性","authors":"C. Hugo, G. Hurtevent, S. Ferron, M. Boisserie-Lacroix, M. Longy, A. Floquet, Brouste, M. Asad-Syed","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2013-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To examine intra-observer reliability (IR) for lesion detection on contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance images (MRI) for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in single and joint double readings, without case selection. Methods: Contrastenhanced breast MRIs were interpreted twice by the same independent reader and twice in joint readings. IR was assessed for lesion detection, normal MRI identification, mass, non-mass like enhancements (NMLE) and focus characterisation, and BI-RADS assessment. Results: MRI examinations for 124 breasts, 65 women (mean age 43.4y) were retrospectively reviewed with 110 lesions identified. Abnormal BI-RADS (3-5) classifications were found for 52.3% in single readings and 58.5% in joint readings. Seven biopsies were performed for 4 histologically confirmed cancers. IR for BI-RADS classifications was good for single (0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.77), and joint readings (0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.93). IR for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) was moderate across single (0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.65) and joint readings (0.44, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56). IR for BI-RADS category according to each enhancement was poor for single (0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.44), and higher for joint readings, (0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72). Conclusions: IR in BI-RADS breast assessments or BI-RADS lesion assessments are better with joint reading in screening for women with high genetic risks, in particular for abnormal MRI (BI-RADS 3, 4 and 5).","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"61 1","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-observer agreement in single and joint double readings of contrast-enhanced breast MRI screening for women with high genetic breast cancer risks\",\"authors\":\"C. Hugo, G. Hurtevent, S. Ferron, M. Boisserie-Lacroix, M. Longy, A. Floquet, Brouste, M. Asad-Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.14312/2052-4994.2013-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To examine intra-observer reliability (IR) for lesion detection on contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance images (MRI) for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in single and joint double readings, without case selection. Methods: Contrastenhanced breast MRIs were interpreted twice by the same independent reader and twice in joint readings. IR was assessed for lesion detection, normal MRI identification, mass, non-mass like enhancements (NMLE) and focus characterisation, and BI-RADS assessment. Results: MRI examinations for 124 breasts, 65 women (mean age 43.4y) were retrospectively reviewed with 110 lesions identified. Abnormal BI-RADS (3-5) classifications were found for 52.3% in single readings and 58.5% in joint readings. Seven biopsies were performed for 4 histologically confirmed cancers. IR for BI-RADS classifications was good for single (0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.77), and joint readings (0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.93). IR for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) was moderate across single (0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.65) and joint readings (0.44, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56). IR for BI-RADS category according to each enhancement was poor for single (0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.44), and higher for joint readings, (0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72). Conclusions: IR in BI-RADS breast assessments or BI-RADS lesion assessments are better with joint reading in screening for women with high genetic risks, in particular for abnormal MRI (BI-RADS 3, 4 and 5).\",\"PeriodicalId\":90205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research & therapy\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"92-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research & therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2013-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2013-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在不进行病例选择的情况下,研究对比增强乳房磁共振图像(MRI)病变检测在单次和联合双次读数中筛查乳腺癌高危女性的观察者内可靠性(IR)。方法:对比增强乳房mri由同一独立阅读器解读两次,联合解读两次。评估IR的病变检测、正常MRI识别、肿块、非肿块样增强(NMLE)和病灶特征,以及BI-RADS评估。结果:回顾性回顾了124个乳房的MRI检查,65名女性(平均年龄43.4岁),确定了110个病变。BI-RADS(3-5)分类异常在单次读数中占52.3%,在联合读数中占58.5%。对4例经组织学证实的肿瘤进行了7例活组织检查。BI-RADS分类的IR对单个读数(0.63,95% CI: 0.49-0.77)和联合读数(0.77,95% CI: 0.61-0.93)都很好。背景实质增强(BPE)的IR在单个(0.53,95% CI: 0.40-0.65)和联合读数(0.44,95% CI: 0.33-0.56)中是中等的。根据每次增强,BI-RADS类别的IR在单个读数中较差(0.27,95% CI: 0.10-0.44),而在联合读数中较高(0.58,95% CI: 0.43-0.72)。结论:在BI-RADS乳房评估或BI-RADS病变评估中,联合阅读在筛查高遗传风险女性时效果更好,特别是在MRI异常时(BI-RADS 3、4和5)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-observer agreement in single and joint double readings of contrast-enhanced breast MRI screening for women with high genetic breast cancer risks
Objectives: To examine intra-observer reliability (IR) for lesion detection on contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance images (MRI) for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in single and joint double readings, without case selection. Methods: Contrastenhanced breast MRIs were interpreted twice by the same independent reader and twice in joint readings. IR was assessed for lesion detection, normal MRI identification, mass, non-mass like enhancements (NMLE) and focus characterisation, and BI-RADS assessment. Results: MRI examinations for 124 breasts, 65 women (mean age 43.4y) were retrospectively reviewed with 110 lesions identified. Abnormal BI-RADS (3-5) classifications were found for 52.3% in single readings and 58.5% in joint readings. Seven biopsies were performed for 4 histologically confirmed cancers. IR for BI-RADS classifications was good for single (0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.77), and joint readings (0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.93). IR for background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) was moderate across single (0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.65) and joint readings (0.44, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56). IR for BI-RADS category according to each enhancement was poor for single (0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.44), and higher for joint readings, (0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72). Conclusions: IR in BI-RADS breast assessments or BI-RADS lesion assessments are better with joint reading in screening for women with high genetic risks, in particular for abnormal MRI (BI-RADS 3, 4 and 5).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信