F Teboul (Chef de clinique, assistant des Hôpitaux), J.-Y Beaulieu (Interne des Hôpitaux), C Oberlin (Chirurgien des Hôpitaux, Professeur des Universités)
{"title":"Paralysies de la flexion et de l'extension du coude","authors":"F Teboul (Chef de clinique, assistant des Hôpitaux),&nbsp;J.-Y Beaulieu (Interne des Hôpitaux),&nbsp;C Oberlin (Chirurgien des Hôpitaux, Professeur des Universités)","doi":"10.1016/j.emcrho.2004.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Palsies affecting elbow flexion result in major disability and therefore warrant routine surgical treatment, even in patients with permanent hand paralysis. When elbow flexion is good, restoring extension which is a classic priority in tetraplegic patients is also extremely useful to patients with peripheral palsies. When the time since the injury is fairly short, “anatomic” flexor or extensor muscles should be given a nerve supply, either by restoring normal anatomic pathways or by nerve transfers. Transferring ulnar nerve fibres to the biceps muscle is now the preferred treatment in patients with satisfactory ulnar nerve function. This technique provides better outcomes than does repair by implantation of grafts from the plexus roots. After 12 to 18 months, the arm muscles can no longer be re-innervated, particularly when the nerve is repaired far upstream from the muscle. Palliative muscle transfer can be used in this situation in patients with transferable muscles. To restore elbow flexion, triceps-biceps transfer is indicated only in patients with co-contractions. Transfer of the medial epicondyle muscles as described by Steindler is preferred when the “anatomic” flexors are grade 2: this procedure assists elbow flexion. Latissimus dorsi transfer is mainly indicated in patients with muscle defects in the anterior arm compartment. To restore elbow extension in patients with damage to the proximal radial nerve, unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer is an excellent procedure because of the synergistic action of this muscle. In patients with tetraplegia, the posterior deltoid muscle can be transferred and prolonged with a tendon graft. The biceps can be transferred to the triceps, particularly in patients with stiffness of the elbow limiting the range of flexion. In patients with massive paralysis and no local transferable muscles, i.e., with long-standing brachial plexus paralysis, the treatment consists in free muscle transfers with re-innervation by transferred local nerves; the muscle used may be the latissimus dorsi from the other side or a gracilis muscle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100448,"journal":{"name":"EMC - Rhumatologie-Orthopédie","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 243-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.emcrho.2004.01.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMC - Rhumatologie-Orthopédie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1762420704000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

影响肘关节屈曲的麻痹导致严重残疾,因此需要常规手术治疗,即使是永久性手麻痹患者。当肘关节屈曲良好时,恢复伸展是四肢瘫痪患者的经典优先事项,对周围性麻痹患者也非常有用。当损伤时间较短时,“解剖性”屈肌或伸肌应通过恢复正常解剖通路或神经转移给予神经供应。目前,对于尺神经功能良好的患者,将尺神经纤维转移到二头肌是首选的治疗方法。该技术比从神经丛根植入术修复的效果更好。12至18个月后,手臂肌肉不能再被重新支配,特别是当神经在远离肌肉的上游修复时。姑息性肌肉转移可用于可转移肌肉患者的这种情况。为了恢复肘关节屈曲,肱三头肌-肱二头肌转移只适用于合并收缩的患者。当“解剖性”屈肌为2级时,首选Steindler所描述的内上髁肌转移:该手术有助于肘关节屈曲。背阔肌转移主要适用于前臂间室肌肉缺损的患者。由于背阔肌的协同作用,单极背阔肌转移是恢复桡神经近端损伤患者肘关节伸展的最佳方法。在四肢瘫痪的病人中,后三角肌可以通过肌腱移植转移和延长。肱二头肌可以转移到肱三头肌,特别是肘关节僵硬限制屈曲范围的患者。对于大面积瘫痪且无局部可转移肌肉的患者,即长期臂丛神经麻痹的患者,治疗包括自由肌肉转移,并通过转移的局部神经进行再神经支配;使用的肌肉可以是另一侧的背阔肌或股薄肌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paralysies de la flexion et de l'extension du coude

Palsies affecting elbow flexion result in major disability and therefore warrant routine surgical treatment, even in patients with permanent hand paralysis. When elbow flexion is good, restoring extension which is a classic priority in tetraplegic patients is also extremely useful to patients with peripheral palsies. When the time since the injury is fairly short, “anatomic” flexor or extensor muscles should be given a nerve supply, either by restoring normal anatomic pathways or by nerve transfers. Transferring ulnar nerve fibres to the biceps muscle is now the preferred treatment in patients with satisfactory ulnar nerve function. This technique provides better outcomes than does repair by implantation of grafts from the plexus roots. After 12 to 18 months, the arm muscles can no longer be re-innervated, particularly when the nerve is repaired far upstream from the muscle. Palliative muscle transfer can be used in this situation in patients with transferable muscles. To restore elbow flexion, triceps-biceps transfer is indicated only in patients with co-contractions. Transfer of the medial epicondyle muscles as described by Steindler is preferred when the “anatomic” flexors are grade 2: this procedure assists elbow flexion. Latissimus dorsi transfer is mainly indicated in patients with muscle defects in the anterior arm compartment. To restore elbow extension in patients with damage to the proximal radial nerve, unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer is an excellent procedure because of the synergistic action of this muscle. In patients with tetraplegia, the posterior deltoid muscle can be transferred and prolonged with a tendon graft. The biceps can be transferred to the triceps, particularly in patients with stiffness of the elbow limiting the range of flexion. In patients with massive paralysis and no local transferable muscles, i.e., with long-standing brachial plexus paralysis, the treatment consists in free muscle transfers with re-innervation by transferred local nerves; the muscle used may be the latissimus dorsi from the other side or a gracilis muscle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信