患者使用氯氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症的经历:系统回顾。

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Steven Parkes, Bethany Mantell, Ebenezer Oloyede, Graham Blackman
{"title":"患者使用氯氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症的经历:系统回顾。","authors":"Steven Parkes, Bethany Mantell, Ebenezer Oloyede, Graham Blackman","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), however, it remains widely under-utilized in clinical practice. To date, relatively little attention has been given to patients' experience of clozapine. By synthesizing the existing literature, we sought to determine the experiences of patients with TRS treated with clozapine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted on Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases for studies from 1956 to 2021. English language studies and those based on adult patients prescribed clozapine for TRS were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included with a total of 1487 patients and a narrative synthesis was performed. Overall, most patients reported positive experiences of clozapine, with generally high levels of satisfaction, alongside symptom improvement and preference over previous medications. Negative experiences of clozapine were less common, but when mentioned, focused on blood tests and common side effects, including hypersalivation and weight gain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first systematic review exploring patients' subjective experiences of clozapine for TRS. Findings suggest that patients generally have a favorable experience when being treated with clozapine. However, conclusions are limited by the risk of bias, particularly survivorship bias. High-quality longitudinal studies exploring patients' experiences of clozapine are indicated for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"sgac042"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11205966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' Experiences of Clozapine for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Parkes, Bethany Mantell, Ebenezer Oloyede, Graham Blackman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), however, it remains widely under-utilized in clinical practice. To date, relatively little attention has been given to patients' experience of clozapine. By synthesizing the existing literature, we sought to determine the experiences of patients with TRS treated with clozapine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted on Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases for studies from 1956 to 2021. English language studies and those based on adult patients prescribed clozapine for TRS were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included with a total of 1487 patients and a narrative synthesis was performed. Overall, most patients reported positive experiences of clozapine, with generally high levels of satisfaction, alongside symptom improvement and preference over previous medications. Negative experiences of clozapine were less common, but when mentioned, focused on blood tests and common side effects, including hypersalivation and weight gain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first systematic review exploring patients' subjective experiences of clozapine for TRS. Findings suggest that patients generally have a favorable experience when being treated with clozapine. However, conclusions are limited by the risk of bias, particularly survivorship bias. High-quality longitudinal studies exploring patients' experiences of clozapine are indicated for the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"sgac042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11205966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氯氮平是治疗耐药精神分裂症(TRS)患者最有效的抗精神病药物,但在临床实践中仍普遍使用不足。迄今为止,人们对患者使用氯氮平的体验关注相对较少。通过综合现有文献,我们试图了解接受氯氮平治疗的 TRS 患者的经历:我们在 Embase、Medline、PsychInfo 和 PubMed 数据库中对 1956 年至 2021 年的研究进行了系统性回顾。结果:共收录了 13 项研究,涉及氯氮平治疗 TRS 的成人患者:结果:共纳入了 13 项研究,共计 1487 名患者,并进行了叙述性综述。总体而言,大多数患者都报告了使用氯氮平的积极体验,满意度普遍较高,同时症状也有所改善,并且比以前的药物更受欢迎。氯氮平的负面经历较少,但如果提及,则主要集中在血液检查和常见的副作用上,包括唾液分泌过多和体重增加:这是第一篇探讨氯氮平治疗 TRS 患者主观感受的系统性综述。研究结果表明,患者在接受氯氮平治疗时一般都有良好的体验。然而,结论受到偏倚风险的限制,尤其是幸存者偏倚。未来应开展高质量的纵向研究,探讨患者对氯氮平的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' Experiences of Clozapine for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.

Background: Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), however, it remains widely under-utilized in clinical practice. To date, relatively little attention has been given to patients' experience of clozapine. By synthesizing the existing literature, we sought to determine the experiences of patients with TRS treated with clozapine.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted on Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases for studies from 1956 to 2021. English language studies and those based on adult patients prescribed clozapine for TRS were included.

Results: Thirteen studies were included with a total of 1487 patients and a narrative synthesis was performed. Overall, most patients reported positive experiences of clozapine, with generally high levels of satisfaction, alongside symptom improvement and preference over previous medications. Negative experiences of clozapine were less common, but when mentioned, focused on blood tests and common side effects, including hypersalivation and weight gain.

Conclusions: This is the first systematic review exploring patients' subjective experiences of clozapine for TRS. Findings suggest that patients generally have a favorable experience when being treated with clozapine. However, conclusions are limited by the risk of bias, particularly survivorship bias. High-quality longitudinal studies exploring patients' experiences of clozapine are indicated for the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信