石油天然气公司采用替代性会计方法

Tim Sovaniski
{"title":"石油天然气公司采用替代性会计方法","authors":"Tim Sovaniski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research problem stems from the fact that accounting organizations do not agree on a specific method for the purpose of organizing financial reports in the oil sector, so FASB requires oil and gas companies to use the Successful efforts method, while the SEC allows companies to use the Full Cost method.<br><br>So, this research aims to study the difference between the accounting methods used in the oil field, namely full cost method (FC) and successful efforts method (SE) in the context of financial reports in an oil company for the purpose of reviewing the pros and cons of the methods used on reported profits and their impact on users interested in financial data.<br><br>The main conclusion of this research can be the Successful Efforts method discloses the internal flaws and supports the investor in reaching reasonable investment decision, and the full cost method highlighted by proponents as the Full Cost methodology in the long run reveals more positive bottom-line results for the firm.<br>","PeriodicalId":12319,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accounting eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employing Alternative Accounting Methods in Oil and Gas Company\",\"authors\":\"Tim Sovaniski\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3679321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research problem stems from the fact that accounting organizations do not agree on a specific method for the purpose of organizing financial reports in the oil sector, so FASB requires oil and gas companies to use the Successful efforts method, while the SEC allows companies to use the Full Cost method.<br><br>So, this research aims to study the difference between the accounting methods used in the oil field, namely full cost method (FC) and successful efforts method (SE) in the context of financial reports in an oil company for the purpose of reviewing the pros and cons of the methods used on reported profits and their impact on users interested in financial data.<br><br>The main conclusion of this research can be the Successful Efforts method discloses the internal flaws and supports the investor in reaching reasonable investment decision, and the full cost method highlighted by proponents as the Full Cost methodology in the long run reveals more positive bottom-line results for the firm.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题源于会计组织在石油部门组织财务报告的具体方法上没有达成一致,因此FASB要求石油和天然气公司使用成功努力法,而SEC允许公司使用全额成本法。因此,本研究旨在研究油田中使用的会计方法,即完全成本法(FC)和成功努力法(SE)在一家石油公司财务报告背景下的差异,目的是审查报告利润所用方法的优缺点及其对财务数据感兴趣的用户的影响。本研究的主要结论可以是成功努力方法揭示了内部缺陷,并支持投资者做出合理的投资决策,而支持者强调的全额成本方法在长期内为公司揭示了更积极的底线结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employing Alternative Accounting Methods in Oil and Gas Company
The research problem stems from the fact that accounting organizations do not agree on a specific method for the purpose of organizing financial reports in the oil sector, so FASB requires oil and gas companies to use the Successful efforts method, while the SEC allows companies to use the Full Cost method.

So, this research aims to study the difference between the accounting methods used in the oil field, namely full cost method (FC) and successful efforts method (SE) in the context of financial reports in an oil company for the purpose of reviewing the pros and cons of the methods used on reported profits and their impact on users interested in financial data.

The main conclusion of this research can be the Successful Efforts method discloses the internal flaws and supports the investor in reaching reasonable investment decision, and the full cost method highlighted by proponents as the Full Cost methodology in the long run reveals more positive bottom-line results for the firm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信