{"title":"论铁笼子:巴勒斯坦托管的基础设施世界","authors":"Fredrik Meiton","doi":"10.1177/02637758221144036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps the most famous image of Palestinian life under the British (1917–1948) is that of the “iron cage.” Rashid Khalidi, the historian who coined the term in the context of Palestine, was referring to a political and military apparatus, operated by the British mandatory government, that constrained the Palestinian leadership to the point of rendering it incapable of taking any effective political action. This article holds on to the notion of the iron cage, but proposes to stretch its meanings in two directions. First, toward the material: the precise properties of the materials and technologies used in building modern Palestine had important consequences for the nature of the territory that emerged, as well as for the Arab–Israeli conflict with which Palestine, as a late-colonial territory, coevolved. The second direction in which the article extends Khalidi’s image is toward its Weberian meaning, as the upshot of the “formal, calculative rationality” of modern capitalism. In doing so, the article argues that the iron cage also operated as a material regime.","PeriodicalId":48303,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","volume":"48 1","pages":"994 - 1008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the iron cage: Infrastructural worlding in Mandate Palestine\",\"authors\":\"Fredrik Meiton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02637758221144036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perhaps the most famous image of Palestinian life under the British (1917–1948) is that of the “iron cage.” Rashid Khalidi, the historian who coined the term in the context of Palestine, was referring to a political and military apparatus, operated by the British mandatory government, that constrained the Palestinian leadership to the point of rendering it incapable of taking any effective political action. This article holds on to the notion of the iron cage, but proposes to stretch its meanings in two directions. First, toward the material: the precise properties of the materials and technologies used in building modern Palestine had important consequences for the nature of the territory that emerged, as well as for the Arab–Israeli conflict with which Palestine, as a late-colonial territory, coevolved. The second direction in which the article extends Khalidi’s image is toward its Weberian meaning, as the upshot of the “formal, calculative rationality” of modern capitalism. In doing so, the article argues that the iron cage also operated as a material regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"994 - 1008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221144036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221144036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the iron cage: Infrastructural worlding in Mandate Palestine
Perhaps the most famous image of Palestinian life under the British (1917–1948) is that of the “iron cage.” Rashid Khalidi, the historian who coined the term in the context of Palestine, was referring to a political and military apparatus, operated by the British mandatory government, that constrained the Palestinian leadership to the point of rendering it incapable of taking any effective political action. This article holds on to the notion of the iron cage, but proposes to stretch its meanings in two directions. First, toward the material: the precise properties of the materials and technologies used in building modern Palestine had important consequences for the nature of the territory that emerged, as well as for the Arab–Israeli conflict with which Palestine, as a late-colonial territory, coevolved. The second direction in which the article extends Khalidi’s image is toward its Weberian meaning, as the upshot of the “formal, calculative rationality” of modern capitalism. In doing so, the article argues that the iron cage also operated as a material regime.
期刊介绍:
EPD: Society and Space is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly and political project. Through both a peer reviewed journal and an editor reviewed companion website, we publish articles, essays, interviews, forums, and book reviews that examine social struggles over access to and control of space, place, territory, region, and resources. We seek contributions that investigate and challenge the ways that modes and systems of power, difference and oppression differentially shape lives, and how those modes and systems are resisted, subverted and reworked. We welcome work that is empirically engaged and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, that pushes conceptual boundaries and puts theory to work in innovative ways, and that consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.