性机器人的道德心理学:一项实验研究——病原体厌恶与人类间性行为有关,而与机器人间性行为无关

Mika Koverola, Marianna Drosinou, Jussi Palomäki, Juho Halonen, Anton Kunnari, M. Repo, Noora Lehtonen, M. Laakasuo
{"title":"性机器人的道德心理学:一项实验研究——病原体厌恶与人类间性行为有关,而与机器人间性行为无关","authors":"Mika Koverola, Marianna Drosinou, Jussi Palomäki, Juho Halonen, Anton Kunnari, M. Repo, Noora Lehtonen, M. Laakasuo","doi":"10.1515/pjbr-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The idea of sex with robots seems to fascinate the general public, raising both enthusiasm and revulsion. We ran two experimental studies (N s = 172 and 260) where we compared people’s reactions to variants of stories about a person visiting a bordello. Our results show that paying for the services of a sex robot is condemned less harshly than paying for the services of a human sex worker, especially if the payer is married. We have for the first time experimentally confirmed that people are somewhat unsure about whether using a sex robot while in a committed monogamous relationship should be considered as infidelity. We also shed light on the psychological factors influencing attitudes toward sex robots, including disgust sensitivity and interest in science fiction. Our results indicate that sex with a robot is indeed genuinely considered as sex, and a sex robot is genuinely seen as a robot; thus, we show that standard research methods on sexuality and robotics are also applicable in research on sex robotics.","PeriodicalId":90037,"journal":{"name":"Paladyn : journal of behavioral robotics","volume":"45 1","pages":"233 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral psychology of sex robots: An experimental study − how pathogen disgust is associated with interhuman sex but not interandroid sex\",\"authors\":\"Mika Koverola, Marianna Drosinou, Jussi Palomäki, Juho Halonen, Anton Kunnari, M. Repo, Noora Lehtonen, M. Laakasuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pjbr-2020-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The idea of sex with robots seems to fascinate the general public, raising both enthusiasm and revulsion. We ran two experimental studies (N s = 172 and 260) where we compared people’s reactions to variants of stories about a person visiting a bordello. Our results show that paying for the services of a sex robot is condemned less harshly than paying for the services of a human sex worker, especially if the payer is married. We have for the first time experimentally confirmed that people are somewhat unsure about whether using a sex robot while in a committed monogamous relationship should be considered as infidelity. We also shed light on the psychological factors influencing attitudes toward sex robots, including disgust sensitivity and interest in science fiction. Our results indicate that sex with a robot is indeed genuinely considered as sex, and a sex robot is genuinely seen as a robot; thus, we show that standard research methods on sexuality and robotics are also applicable in research on sex robotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paladyn : journal of behavioral robotics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paladyn : journal of behavioral robotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paladyn : journal of behavioral robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

与机器人做爱的想法似乎吸引了普通大众,激起了热情和反感。我们进行了两项实验研究(N = 172和260),我们比较了人们对一个人去妓院的不同故事的反应。我们的研究结果表明,与付钱给人类性工作者相比,付钱给性爱机器人受到的谴责要轻一些,尤其是在付款人已婚的情况下。我们第一次通过实验证实,人们在某种程度上不确定,在一段忠诚的一夫一妻关系中使用性爱机器人是否应该被视为不忠。我们还揭示了影响人们对性爱机器人态度的心理因素,包括厌恶敏感性和对科幻小说的兴趣。我们的研究结果表明,与机器人的性行为确实被真正地视为性行为,而性爱机器人也被真正地视为机器人;因此,我们表明,性和机器人的标准研究方法也适用于性机器人的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral psychology of sex robots: An experimental study − how pathogen disgust is associated with interhuman sex but not interandroid sex
Abstract The idea of sex with robots seems to fascinate the general public, raising both enthusiasm and revulsion. We ran two experimental studies (N s = 172 and 260) where we compared people’s reactions to variants of stories about a person visiting a bordello. Our results show that paying for the services of a sex robot is condemned less harshly than paying for the services of a human sex worker, especially if the payer is married. We have for the first time experimentally confirmed that people are somewhat unsure about whether using a sex robot while in a committed monogamous relationship should be considered as infidelity. We also shed light on the psychological factors influencing attitudes toward sex robots, including disgust sensitivity and interest in science fiction. Our results indicate that sex with a robot is indeed genuinely considered as sex, and a sex robot is genuinely seen as a robot; thus, we show that standard research methods on sexuality and robotics are also applicable in research on sex robotics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信