含氧溶剂作为一种提高致密油采收率的新型添加剂

Mingyuan Wang, K. Baek, Gayan A. Abeykoon, F. J. Argüelles-Vivas, R. Okuno
{"title":"含氧溶剂作为一种提高致密油采收率的新型添加剂","authors":"Mingyuan Wang, K. Baek, Gayan A. Abeykoon, F. J. Argüelles-Vivas, R. Okuno","doi":"10.2118/195871-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Tight oil reservoirs typically show rapid reduction in production rate within a few years. Various methods of improved oil recovery from tight reservoirs have been studied, such as cyclic injection of gas and chemical solutions. Chemical solution injection is expected to improve oil recovery through wettability alteration and water/oil interfacial tension (IFT) reduction because most tight oil reservoirs are reportedly intermediate- to oil-wet.\n This paper presents a comparative study of two wettability modifiers with different characters for enhancing water imbibition from a fracture into the surrounding matrix. One is 3-pentanone, a symmetric short ketone, and the other is 2-ethylhexanol-4PO-15EO, a non-ionic surfactant with an ultra-short hydrophobe. They were used as low-concentration additives (approximately 1 wt%) to reservoir brine (RB) in this research.\n Contact-angle experiments with oil-aged calcite surfaces showed that the two chemicals are comparable as wettability modifiers. For example, the surfactant solution was able to change the contact angle of oil droplets on oil-aged calcite surfaces from 134° to 47° within a day.\n Coreflooding experiments using fractured limestone cores showed that the 3-pentanone solution resulted in more rapid oil recovery by water imbibition than the surfactant solution. The incremental oil recovery factor was 30.9% for 1.6 pore-volumes injected (PVI) of the 3-pentanone solution and 8.4% for 1.2 PVI of the chase RB. For the surfactant case, it was 23.6% for 1.6 PVI of the surfactant solution and 23.7% for 7.0 PVI of the chase RB.\n The difference in oil recovery response between the two chemical solutions was attributed to their different characters as wettability modifiers; that is, the surfactant solution lowers the water/oil IFT from 11 mN/m to 0.21 mN/m, but the 3-pentanone solution does not. The 3-pentanone solution can keep the original water/oil IFT, and increase the capillary force for water imbibition by wettability alteration. The importance of lowering the water/oil IFT was observed during the extended chase RB injection after the surfactant slug. The oil recovery in the surfactant case was increasing even after 7.0 PVI of the chase RB.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxygenated Solvent as a Novel Additive for Improved Oil Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Mingyuan Wang, K. Baek, Gayan A. Abeykoon, F. J. Argüelles-Vivas, R. Okuno\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195871-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Tight oil reservoirs typically show rapid reduction in production rate within a few years. Various methods of improved oil recovery from tight reservoirs have been studied, such as cyclic injection of gas and chemical solutions. Chemical solution injection is expected to improve oil recovery through wettability alteration and water/oil interfacial tension (IFT) reduction because most tight oil reservoirs are reportedly intermediate- to oil-wet.\\n This paper presents a comparative study of two wettability modifiers with different characters for enhancing water imbibition from a fracture into the surrounding matrix. One is 3-pentanone, a symmetric short ketone, and the other is 2-ethylhexanol-4PO-15EO, a non-ionic surfactant with an ultra-short hydrophobe. They were used as low-concentration additives (approximately 1 wt%) to reservoir brine (RB) in this research.\\n Contact-angle experiments with oil-aged calcite surfaces showed that the two chemicals are comparable as wettability modifiers. For example, the surfactant solution was able to change the contact angle of oil droplets on oil-aged calcite surfaces from 134° to 47° within a day.\\n Coreflooding experiments using fractured limestone cores showed that the 3-pentanone solution resulted in more rapid oil recovery by water imbibition than the surfactant solution. The incremental oil recovery factor was 30.9% for 1.6 pore-volumes injected (PVI) of the 3-pentanone solution and 8.4% for 1.2 PVI of the chase RB. For the surfactant case, it was 23.6% for 1.6 PVI of the surfactant solution and 23.7% for 7.0 PVI of the chase RB.\\n The difference in oil recovery response between the two chemical solutions was attributed to their different characters as wettability modifiers; that is, the surfactant solution lowers the water/oil IFT from 11 mN/m to 0.21 mN/m, but the 3-pentanone solution does not. The 3-pentanone solution can keep the original water/oil IFT, and increase the capillary force for water imbibition by wettability alteration. The importance of lowering the water/oil IFT was observed during the extended chase RB injection after the surfactant slug. The oil recovery in the surfactant case was increasing even after 7.0 PVI of the chase RB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195871-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195871-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

致密油油藏通常在几年内产量迅速下降。人们研究了各种提高致密储层采收率的方法,如循环注气和化学溶液。化学溶液注入有望通过改变润湿性和降低水/油界面张力(IFT)来提高采收率,因为据报道大多数致密油储层都是中湿到油湿的。对比研究了两种不同性质的润湿性改性剂对提高裂缝对周围基质的吸水性的作用。一种是对称短酮3-戊酮,另一种是2-乙基己醇- 4po - 15eo,一种具有超短疏水性的非离子表面活性剂。在本研究中,它们被用作储层盐水(RB)的低浓度添加剂(约1wt %)。油龄方解石表面的接触角实验表明,这两种化学物质作为润湿性改性剂具有可比性。例如,表面活性剂溶液能够在一天内将油龄方解石表面的油滴接触角从134°改变为47°。裂缝型灰岩岩心驱油实验表明,3-戊酮溶液的吸油效果比表面活性剂溶液更快。注孔体积为1.6的3-戊酮溶液的增量采收率为30.9%,注孔体积为1.2的3-戊酮溶液的增量采收率为8.4%。对于表面活性剂的情况,表面活性剂溶液为1.6 PVI时为23.6%,而在7.0 PVI时为23.7%。两种化学溶液在采收率上的差异主要归因于其润湿性改性剂的不同特性;也就是说,表面活性剂溶液将水/油IFT从11 mN/m降低到0.21 mN/m,而3-戊酮溶液则没有。3-戊酮溶液可以保持原有的水/油IFT,并通过润湿性改变增加毛细力吸水性。在表面活性剂段塞后的长时间追逐RB注入过程中,观察到降低水/油IFT的重要性。在表面活性剂情况下,即使在7.0 PVI后,采收率仍有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxygenated Solvent as a Novel Additive for Improved Oil Recovery in Tight Oil Reservoirs
Tight oil reservoirs typically show rapid reduction in production rate within a few years. Various methods of improved oil recovery from tight reservoirs have been studied, such as cyclic injection of gas and chemical solutions. Chemical solution injection is expected to improve oil recovery through wettability alteration and water/oil interfacial tension (IFT) reduction because most tight oil reservoirs are reportedly intermediate- to oil-wet. This paper presents a comparative study of two wettability modifiers with different characters for enhancing water imbibition from a fracture into the surrounding matrix. One is 3-pentanone, a symmetric short ketone, and the other is 2-ethylhexanol-4PO-15EO, a non-ionic surfactant with an ultra-short hydrophobe. They were used as low-concentration additives (approximately 1 wt%) to reservoir brine (RB) in this research. Contact-angle experiments with oil-aged calcite surfaces showed that the two chemicals are comparable as wettability modifiers. For example, the surfactant solution was able to change the contact angle of oil droplets on oil-aged calcite surfaces from 134° to 47° within a day. Coreflooding experiments using fractured limestone cores showed that the 3-pentanone solution resulted in more rapid oil recovery by water imbibition than the surfactant solution. The incremental oil recovery factor was 30.9% for 1.6 pore-volumes injected (PVI) of the 3-pentanone solution and 8.4% for 1.2 PVI of the chase RB. For the surfactant case, it was 23.6% for 1.6 PVI of the surfactant solution and 23.7% for 7.0 PVI of the chase RB. The difference in oil recovery response between the two chemical solutions was attributed to their different characters as wettability modifiers; that is, the surfactant solution lowers the water/oil IFT from 11 mN/m to 0.21 mN/m, but the 3-pentanone solution does not. The 3-pentanone solution can keep the original water/oil IFT, and increase the capillary force for water imbibition by wettability alteration. The importance of lowering the water/oil IFT was observed during the extended chase RB injection after the surfactant slug. The oil recovery in the surfactant case was increasing even after 7.0 PVI of the chase RB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信