{"title":"不同错颌组牙齿大小比的博尔顿分析比较","authors":"H. Fatahi, R. Razmdideh, H. Poursadeghi","doi":"10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.41525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: For proper occlusal interdigitation or coordination of arches in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment with proper overjet and overbite would have been a proper mesiodistal tooth size ratio (Bolton analysis) between maxillary and madibular teeth. The Bolton analysis should be taken into consideration when diagnosing, treatment planning and predicting prognosis in clinical orthodontics. In this study tooth size ratio was evaluated among different malocclusion groups. Materials and Method: This study was carried out on 200 pretreatment orthodontic casts, which were chosen through selective available sampling procedure according to selective criterias. They were classified by the Angle classification, coincided with skeletal categories. Skeletal types were assessed by ANB angle from cephalometric analysis. All the subjects were divided into 4 groups: each group consisted of 25 males and 25 females. These groups were Cl I malocclusion, Cl II Div 1, Cl II Div 2 and Cl III. The greatest mesiodistal diameters of all the teeth on each cast were obtained except the second and third molars. The measurement was done by digital caliper with 0.01 mm accuracy. Then tooth size ratios were analyzed as Bolton described. Results: The main anterior ratio for male patients was larger than that of female patients in all groups (p<0.05), while there was no significant sexual dimorphism for overall and posterior ratios between the groups. The mean of the anterior ratio of Cl III patients was shown to be more than Cl II Div 1 amd Cl II Div 2. No statistical difference was found between Cl III and Cl I patients. Posterior and overall ratios of Cl III patients were larger than other groups. The mean overall ratio of Cl I patients was larger than Cl II Div 1, but it had no significant difference with Cl II Div 2 group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the tooth size discrepancy between the maxillary and mandibular teeth may be one of the important factors in the cause of malocclusions, especially in Cl III malocclusion. Key words: Bolton analysis, Anterior, Posterior and overall ratios, Malocclusion","PeriodicalId":15562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Tooth Size Ratios (Bolton Analysis) Among Different Malocclusion Groups\",\"authors\":\"H. Fatahi, R. Razmdideh, H. Poursadeghi\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.41525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: For proper occlusal interdigitation or coordination of arches in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment with proper overjet and overbite would have been a proper mesiodistal tooth size ratio (Bolton analysis) between maxillary and madibular teeth. The Bolton analysis should be taken into consideration when diagnosing, treatment planning and predicting prognosis in clinical orthodontics. In this study tooth size ratio was evaluated among different malocclusion groups. Materials and Method: This study was carried out on 200 pretreatment orthodontic casts, which were chosen through selective available sampling procedure according to selective criterias. They were classified by the Angle classification, coincided with skeletal categories. Skeletal types were assessed by ANB angle from cephalometric analysis. All the subjects were divided into 4 groups: each group consisted of 25 males and 25 females. These groups were Cl I malocclusion, Cl II Div 1, Cl II Div 2 and Cl III. The greatest mesiodistal diameters of all the teeth on each cast were obtained except the second and third molars. The measurement was done by digital caliper with 0.01 mm accuracy. Then tooth size ratios were analyzed as Bolton described. Results: The main anterior ratio for male patients was larger than that of female patients in all groups (p<0.05), while there was no significant sexual dimorphism for overall and posterior ratios between the groups. The mean of the anterior ratio of Cl III patients was shown to be more than Cl II Div 1 amd Cl II Div 2. No statistical difference was found between Cl III and Cl I patients. Posterior and overall ratios of Cl III patients were larger than other groups. The mean overall ratio of Cl I patients was larger than Cl II Div 1, but it had no significant difference with Cl II Div 2 group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the tooth size discrepancy between the maxillary and mandibular teeth may be one of the important factors in the cause of malocclusions, especially in Cl III malocclusion. Key words: Bolton analysis, Anterior, Posterior and overall ratios, Malocclusion\",\"PeriodicalId\":15562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"39-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.41525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.41525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在正畸治疗的最后阶段,适当的覆盖和覆盖将使上颌和下颌牙齿之间的中远端牙齿大小比例(博尔顿分析)适当。在临床正畸的诊断、治疗计划和预测预后时应考虑到博尔顿分析。本研究比较了不同错牙合组间的牙尺寸比。材料与方法:本研究采用200个预处理正畸铸型,根据选择标准,通过可选的抽样程序进行选择。它们按照角度分类,与骨骼分类一致。通过头颅测量分析ANB角度评估骨骼类型。所有受试者分为4组,每组男性25人,女性25人。这些组分别是Cl I错颌、Cl II Div 1、Cl II Div 2和Cl III。除第二磨牙和第三磨牙外,所有铸型牙均获得最大中远端直径。测量采用数字卡尺,精度为0.01 mm。然后按照博尔顿的描述分析齿尺寸比。结果:各组男性患者主前比值均大于女性患者(p<0.05),组间总后比值无明显性别二态性。Cl III患者的平均前路比值大于Cl II Div 1和Cl II Div 2。III级和I级患者间无统计学差异。III级患者的后验和总比值大于其他组。Cl I患者的平均总比值大于Cl II Div 1组,但与Cl II Div 2组无显著差异。结论:本研究提示上颌牙与下颌牙之间的牙尺寸差异可能是导致错颌的重要因素之一,尤其是Cl - III型错颌。关键词:博尔顿分析,前、后、总比值,错颌
Comparison of Tooth Size Ratios (Bolton Analysis) Among Different Malocclusion Groups
Introduction: For proper occlusal interdigitation or coordination of arches in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment with proper overjet and overbite would have been a proper mesiodistal tooth size ratio (Bolton analysis) between maxillary and madibular teeth. The Bolton analysis should be taken into consideration when diagnosing, treatment planning and predicting prognosis in clinical orthodontics. In this study tooth size ratio was evaluated among different malocclusion groups. Materials and Method: This study was carried out on 200 pretreatment orthodontic casts, which were chosen through selective available sampling procedure according to selective criterias. They were classified by the Angle classification, coincided with skeletal categories. Skeletal types were assessed by ANB angle from cephalometric analysis. All the subjects were divided into 4 groups: each group consisted of 25 males and 25 females. These groups were Cl I malocclusion, Cl II Div 1, Cl II Div 2 and Cl III. The greatest mesiodistal diameters of all the teeth on each cast were obtained except the second and third molars. The measurement was done by digital caliper with 0.01 mm accuracy. Then tooth size ratios were analyzed as Bolton described. Results: The main anterior ratio for male patients was larger than that of female patients in all groups (p<0.05), while there was no significant sexual dimorphism for overall and posterior ratios between the groups. The mean of the anterior ratio of Cl III patients was shown to be more than Cl II Div 1 amd Cl II Div 2. No statistical difference was found between Cl III and Cl I patients. Posterior and overall ratios of Cl III patients were larger than other groups. The mean overall ratio of Cl I patients was larger than Cl II Div 1, but it had no significant difference with Cl II Div 2 group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the tooth size discrepancy between the maxillary and mandibular teeth may be one of the important factors in the cause of malocclusions, especially in Cl III malocclusion. Key words: Bolton analysis, Anterior, Posterior and overall ratios, Malocclusion