CLIL与非CLIL基础教育中的师生互动

IF 0.7 Q3 LINGUISTICS
Rafael Alejo-González, Manuel Lucero, Mary J. Schleppegrell, Ana Sánchez
{"title":"CLIL与非CLIL基础教育中的师生互动","authors":"Rafael Alejo-González, Manuel Lucero, Mary J. Schleppegrell, Ana Sánchez","doi":"10.1075/jicb.21005.ale","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyzes interaction in a primary school science classroom. We compare the verbal scaffolding\n strategies used by a teacher during lessons from the same instructional unit taught in CLIL (English) and regular (Spanish)\n contexts. Results show that although there was no difference in the amount of information (‘content’) made available to students\n through the interactions, different verbal strategies were used (precision, justification and\n recall were more frequent in Spanish and exemplification in English) and that students were\n more active in engaging with science knowledge in the Spanish context. We discuss these findings in relation to the level of\n abstraction the teacher supported in interacting about science in the regular session, with implications for supporting children\n in learning both content and language in CLIL contexts.","PeriodicalId":44473,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student-teacher interaction in CLIL and non-CLIL elementary education\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Alejo-González, Manuel Lucero, Mary J. Schleppegrell, Ana Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jicb.21005.ale\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study analyzes interaction in a primary school science classroom. We compare the verbal scaffolding\\n strategies used by a teacher during lessons from the same instructional unit taught in CLIL (English) and regular (Spanish)\\n contexts. Results show that although there was no difference in the amount of information (‘content’) made available to students\\n through the interactions, different verbal strategies were used (precision, justification and\\n recall were more frequent in Spanish and exemplification in English) and that students were\\n more active in engaging with science knowledge in the Spanish context. We discuss these findings in relation to the level of\\n abstraction the teacher supported in interacting about science in the regular session, with implications for supporting children\\n in learning both content and language in CLIL contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21005.ale\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21005.ale","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了小学科学课堂的互动。我们比较了教师在CLIL(英语)和常规(西班牙语)环境中同一教学单元的课程中使用的言语脚手架策略。结果表明,尽管通过互动向学生提供的信息量(“内容”)没有差异,但使用了不同的语言策略(西班牙语中更频繁地使用精确、辩护和回忆,而英语中更频繁地使用例证),学生在西班牙语语境中更积极地参与科学知识。我们讨论了这些发现与教师在常规课程中支持的科学互动抽象水平的关系,以及支持儿童在CLIL环境中学习内容和语言的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student-teacher interaction in CLIL and non-CLIL elementary education
This study analyzes interaction in a primary school science classroom. We compare the verbal scaffolding strategies used by a teacher during lessons from the same instructional unit taught in CLIL (English) and regular (Spanish) contexts. Results show that although there was no difference in the amount of information (‘content’) made available to students through the interactions, different verbal strategies were used (precision, justification and recall were more frequent in Spanish and exemplification in English) and that students were more active in engaging with science knowledge in the Spanish context. We discuss these findings in relation to the level of abstraction the teacher supported in interacting about science in the regular session, with implications for supporting children in learning both content and language in CLIL contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信