当代对精神病学共病理解的争议

Q1 Social Sciences
V. Krasnov
{"title":"当代对精神病学共病理解的争议","authors":"V. Krasnov","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1394008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The pre-therapeutic classification of comorbidity in chronic disease has been excessively broadened and distorted since A. R. Feinstein’s initial definition of the concept in 1970. Examinations more often than not establish the ‘comorbidity’ of depression and anxiety, instead of looking for a common pathological core of the two conditions. The ‘concurrence’ of symptoms of depression and anxiety, which is indeed very frequent in clinical practice, would be a more acceptable concept. It is even stranger to talk about the comorbidity of obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia: the question is what constitutes the primary disorder in such a combination. Schizophrenia or affective disorders are also very often categorized as being comorbid with personality disorders, without taking into account the manifestation of some behavioural personality disorders as pre-conditions or a prodrome of more serious disorders. For the purposes of treatment, taking into consideration the comorbidity of mental disorders and somatic illnesses is of paramount importance. Here we can mention, for example, the comorbidity of schizophrenia and AIDS or tuberculosis, recurrent depression and cardiovascular disease or diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder and asthma. The cases of comorbidity of affective disorders and abuse of alcohol or other psychoactive substances seem to be more disputable, since affective disturbances very often provoke alcohol excesses or temporary drug abuse not necessarily leading to dependency.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"9 1","pages":"42 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies in the contemporary understanding of comorbidity in psychiatry\",\"authors\":\"V. Krasnov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17542863.2017.1394008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The pre-therapeutic classification of comorbidity in chronic disease has been excessively broadened and distorted since A. R. Feinstein’s initial definition of the concept in 1970. Examinations more often than not establish the ‘comorbidity’ of depression and anxiety, instead of looking for a common pathological core of the two conditions. The ‘concurrence’ of symptoms of depression and anxiety, which is indeed very frequent in clinical practice, would be a more acceptable concept. It is even stranger to talk about the comorbidity of obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia: the question is what constitutes the primary disorder in such a combination. Schizophrenia or affective disorders are also very often categorized as being comorbid with personality disorders, without taking into account the manifestation of some behavioural personality disorders as pre-conditions or a prodrome of more serious disorders. For the purposes of treatment, taking into consideration the comorbidity of mental disorders and somatic illnesses is of paramount importance. Here we can mention, for example, the comorbidity of schizophrenia and AIDS or tuberculosis, recurrent depression and cardiovascular disease or diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder and asthma. The cases of comorbidity of affective disorders and abuse of alcohol or other psychoactive substances seem to be more disputable, since affective disturbances very often provoke alcohol excesses or temporary drug abuse not necessarily leading to dependency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"42 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1394008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1394008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1970年A. R. Feinstein最初定义慢性疾病共病的概念以来,治疗前共病的分类已经被过度扩大和扭曲。检查往往不是建立抑郁和焦虑的“共病”,而不是寻找这两种情况的共同病理核心。抑郁和焦虑症状的“同时出现”在临床实践中确实非常频繁,这将是一个更可接受的概念。谈论强迫症和精神分裂症的共病就更奇怪了:问题是,在这种组合中,什么构成了主要的疾病。精神分裂症或情感障碍也经常被归类为人格障碍的共病,而没有考虑到某些行为人格障碍的表现是更严重障碍的先决条件或前驱症状。为了治疗的目的,考虑到精神障碍和躯体疾病的共病是至关重要的。在这里,我们可以提到,例如,精神分裂症和艾滋病或结核病的合并症,复发性抑郁症和心血管疾病或糖尿病,广泛性焦虑症和哮喘。情感性障碍与滥用酒精或其他精神活性物质同时出现的情况似乎更有争议,因为情感性障碍常常引起酗酒或暂时滥用药物,但不一定导致依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies in the contemporary understanding of comorbidity in psychiatry
ABSTRACT The pre-therapeutic classification of comorbidity in chronic disease has been excessively broadened and distorted since A. R. Feinstein’s initial definition of the concept in 1970. Examinations more often than not establish the ‘comorbidity’ of depression and anxiety, instead of looking for a common pathological core of the two conditions. The ‘concurrence’ of symptoms of depression and anxiety, which is indeed very frequent in clinical practice, would be a more acceptable concept. It is even stranger to talk about the comorbidity of obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia: the question is what constitutes the primary disorder in such a combination. Schizophrenia or affective disorders are also very often categorized as being comorbid with personality disorders, without taking into account the manifestation of some behavioural personality disorders as pre-conditions or a prodrome of more serious disorders. For the purposes of treatment, taking into consideration the comorbidity of mental disorders and somatic illnesses is of paramount importance. Here we can mention, for example, the comorbidity of schizophrenia and AIDS or tuberculosis, recurrent depression and cardiovascular disease or diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder and asthma. The cases of comorbidity of affective disorders and abuse of alcohol or other psychoactive substances seem to be more disputable, since affective disturbances very often provoke alcohol excesses or temporary drug abuse not necessarily leading to dependency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信