固体废物管理的多准则分析和相应的生命周期评估:一种综合方法

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
A. B. Saraiva, J. Clímaco, R. Valle, C. Mahler
{"title":"固体废物管理的多准则分析和相应的生命周期评估:一种综合方法","authors":"A. B. Saraiva, J. Clímaco, R. Valle, C. Mahler","doi":"10.4018/IJDSST.2021070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a case study comparing different approaches for management of organic waste generated in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, this study proposes the combination of consequential lifecycle assessment (CLCA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Compared approaches were landfilling with energy recovery from landfill gas, source segregation of organics for anaerobic digestion and use of digestate as fertilizer, and finally, post-sorting of organics and landfilling of residual bio-solids. Seven different impact categories were assessed in the CLCA. In addition, recovery of electricity and macro nutrients were included as additional impact categories. The use of VIP analysis facilitates the interpretation of results aggregating them under different conditions. Furthermore, approaches for ranking of considered impact categories could be carried out both for a local or a global perspective. This, and the possibility of easily including additional context derived evaluation parameters, clearly highlights the combination of CLCA and VIP analysis for decision support.","PeriodicalId":42414,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Criteria Analysis and Consequential Lifecycle Assessment of Solid Waste Management: An Integrated Approach\",\"authors\":\"A. B. Saraiva, J. Clímaco, R. Valle, C. Mahler\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJDSST.2021070101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a case study comparing different approaches for management of organic waste generated in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, this study proposes the combination of consequential lifecycle assessment (CLCA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Compared approaches were landfilling with energy recovery from landfill gas, source segregation of organics for anaerobic digestion and use of digestate as fertilizer, and finally, post-sorting of organics and landfilling of residual bio-solids. Seven different impact categories were assessed in the CLCA. In addition, recovery of electricity and macro nutrients were included as additional impact categories. The use of VIP analysis facilitates the interpretation of results aggregating them under different conditions. Furthermore, approaches for ranking of considered impact categories could be carried out both for a local or a global perspective. This, and the possibility of easily including additional context derived evaluation parameters, clearly highlights the combination of CLCA and VIP analysis for decision support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDSST.2021070101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Decision Support System Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDSST.2021070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过对巴西里约热内卢市有机废物不同管理方法的比较研究,提出了相应生命周期评估(CLCA)和多标准决策分析(MCDA)相结合的方法。比较的方法有垃圾填埋气能量回收、有机物源分离厌氧消化和消化液作为肥料、有机物后分类和剩余生物固体填埋。CLCA评估了七个不同的影响类别。此外,电力的恢复和宏观营养物质被列入附加影响类别。VIP分析的使用有助于在不同条件下汇总结果的解释。此外,可以从当地或全球的角度对所考虑的影响类别进行排序。这一点,以及很容易包括额外的上下文派生的评估参数的可能性,清楚地强调了CLCA和VIP分析对决策支持的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Criteria Analysis and Consequential Lifecycle Assessment of Solid Waste Management: An Integrated Approach
Based on a case study comparing different approaches for management of organic waste generated in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, this study proposes the combination of consequential lifecycle assessment (CLCA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Compared approaches were landfilling with energy recovery from landfill gas, source segregation of organics for anaerobic digestion and use of digestate as fertilizer, and finally, post-sorting of organics and landfilling of residual bio-solids. Seven different impact categories were assessed in the CLCA. In addition, recovery of electricity and macro nutrients were included as additional impact categories. The use of VIP analysis facilitates the interpretation of results aggregating them under different conditions. Furthermore, approaches for ranking of considered impact categories could be carried out both for a local or a global perspective. This, and the possibility of easily including additional context derived evaluation parameters, clearly highlights the combination of CLCA and VIP analysis for decision support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Decision Support System Technology
International Journal of Decision Support System Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信