税收优惠对研发支出资本化具有决定性和相关性吗?来自欧洲的证据

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
G. Martino, Grazia Dicuonzo, A. Vitelli, Vittorio Dell’Atti
{"title":"税收优惠对研发支出资本化具有决定性和相关性吗?来自欧洲的证据","authors":"G. Martino, Grazia Dicuonzo, A. Vitelli, Vittorio Dell’Atti","doi":"10.3280/fr2020-002003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a sample of European listed companies between 2014 and 2017, we ex-a¬mine accounting factors that lead management to capitalize R&D costs, with a specific focus on the tax incentives in the form of government grants. In our analysis, we distinguish between companies which capitalize R&D costs (\"capitalizers\") and companies which expense R&D costs (\"expensers\"). The evidence shows that the choice to capitalize R&D costs is positively related to the recognition of grants as revenue. We also investigate the value relevance of tax incentives related to R&D expenditures. Our empirical findings show that investors draw a distinction between government grants associated with research costs (EXP) and those asso-ciated with development costs (CAP). This paper presents both theoretical and practical implications. It contributes to the current debate on expensing or capital-izing R&D costs through a study of tax incentives received by companies for their research activity. Moreover, it offers empirical evidence on the use of R&D cost capitalization for purposes of tax incentives, which can be utilized by standard set-ters to assess opportunistic behaviors adopted by companies.","PeriodicalId":42044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are tax incentives determinant and relevant for capitalizing R&D expenditures? Evidence from Europe\",\"authors\":\"G. Martino, Grazia Dicuonzo, A. Vitelli, Vittorio Dell’Atti\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/fr2020-002003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a sample of European listed companies between 2014 and 2017, we ex-a¬mine accounting factors that lead management to capitalize R&D costs, with a specific focus on the tax incentives in the form of government grants. In our analysis, we distinguish between companies which capitalize R&D costs (\\\"capitalizers\\\") and companies which expense R&D costs (\\\"expensers\\\"). The evidence shows that the choice to capitalize R&D costs is positively related to the recognition of grants as revenue. We also investigate the value relevance of tax incentives related to R&D expenditures. Our empirical findings show that investors draw a distinction between government grants associated with research costs (EXP) and those asso-ciated with development costs (CAP). This paper presents both theoretical and practical implications. It contributes to the current debate on expensing or capital-izing R&D costs through a study of tax incentives received by companies for their research activity. Moreover, it offers empirical evidence on the use of R&D cost capitalization for purposes of tax incentives, which can be utilized by standard set-ters to assess opportunistic behaviors adopted by companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Reporting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Reporting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/fr2020-002003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/fr2020-002003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以2014年至2017年的欧洲上市公司为样本,我们分析了导致管理层将研发成本资本化的会计因素,并特别关注了政府补助形式的税收激励。在我们的分析中,我们区分了将研发成本资本化的公司(“资本化者”)和将研发成本支出化的公司(“支出者”)。研究结果表明,将研发成本资本化的选择与将赠款确认为收入呈正相关。我们还研究了与研发支出相关的税收优惠的价值相关性。我们的实证研究结果表明,投资者区分了与研究成本(EXP)相关的政府补助和与开发成本(CAP)相关的政府补助。本文提出了理论和实践意义。它通过对公司为其研究活动所获得的税收激励的研究,为当前关于费用化或资本化研发成本的辩论做出了贡献。此外,本文还提供了将研发成本资本化用于税收激励的实证证据,这可以被标准制定者用来评估公司采取的机会主义行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are tax incentives determinant and relevant for capitalizing R&D expenditures? Evidence from Europe
Using a sample of European listed companies between 2014 and 2017, we ex-a¬mine accounting factors that lead management to capitalize R&D costs, with a specific focus on the tax incentives in the form of government grants. In our analysis, we distinguish between companies which capitalize R&D costs ("capitalizers") and companies which expense R&D costs ("expensers"). The evidence shows that the choice to capitalize R&D costs is positively related to the recognition of grants as revenue. We also investigate the value relevance of tax incentives related to R&D expenditures. Our empirical findings show that investors draw a distinction between government grants associated with research costs (EXP) and those asso-ciated with development costs (CAP). This paper presents both theoretical and practical implications. It contributes to the current debate on expensing or capital-izing R&D costs through a study of tax incentives received by companies for their research activity. Moreover, it offers empirical evidence on the use of R&D cost capitalization for purposes of tax incentives, which can be utilized by standard set-ters to assess opportunistic behaviors adopted by companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Reporting
Journal of Financial Reporting BUSINESS, FINANCE-
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信