缺血前后联合适应对心肌保护的作用

Kelly Casós, Paula Soler-Ferrer, María L Pérez, Juan M Gracia-Baena, M. A. Castro, C. Sureda, M. Galiñanes
{"title":"缺血前后联合适应对心肌保护的作用","authors":"Kelly Casós, Paula Soler-Ferrer, María L Pérez, Juan M Gracia-Baena, M. A. Castro, C. Sureda, M. Galiñanes","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Ischemic pre-conditioning (IPreC) and post-conditioning (IPostC) protect the human myocardium against ischemia/reoxygenation (I/R) injury. However, the two interventions may induce variable degrees of protection, suggesting different mechanisms of action. This study assessed whether IPreC and IPostC confer greater protection when used in combination rather than individually. Methods: The right atrial appendages from 50 patients were subjected to 90 min of ischemia and 120 min of reoxygenation according to different protocols: IPostC (1 cycle of 120 and 180 sec of I/R) and IPreC (1 cycle of 5 min ischemia/5 min reoxygenation), alone and in combination. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release was measured as an index of tissue injury and 3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction as an index of cell viability. Results: The results showed that in one half of muscles the combined use of IPreC and IPostC reduced injury compared to either intervention alone whereas in the remaining half the combined approach had no greater effect. Nonetheless, the addition of IPreC to IPostC increased the number of protected samples by almost 20% compared to IPostC alone. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the lack of a uniform response to IPreC and IPostC and that the combined use of the two treatments improves protection although does not abolish the further myocardial injury that occurs in some instances in response to IPostC.","PeriodicalId":15504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Combined Ischemic Pre- and Post-Conditioning to Protect the Human Myocardium\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Casós, Paula Soler-Ferrer, María L Pérez, Juan M Gracia-Baena, M. A. Castro, C. Sureda, M. Galiñanes\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9880.1000611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Ischemic pre-conditioning (IPreC) and post-conditioning (IPostC) protect the human myocardium against ischemia/reoxygenation (I/R) injury. However, the two interventions may induce variable degrees of protection, suggesting different mechanisms of action. This study assessed whether IPreC and IPostC confer greater protection when used in combination rather than individually. Methods: The right atrial appendages from 50 patients were subjected to 90 min of ischemia and 120 min of reoxygenation according to different protocols: IPostC (1 cycle of 120 and 180 sec of I/R) and IPreC (1 cycle of 5 min ischemia/5 min reoxygenation), alone and in combination. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release was measured as an index of tissue injury and 3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction as an index of cell viability. Results: The results showed that in one half of muscles the combined use of IPreC and IPostC reduced injury compared to either intervention alone whereas in the remaining half the combined approach had no greater effect. Nonetheless, the addition of IPreC to IPostC increased the number of protected samples by almost 20% compared to IPostC alone. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the lack of a uniform response to IPreC and IPostC and that the combined use of the two treatments improves protection although does not abolish the further myocardial injury that occurs in some instances in response to IPostC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:缺血预适应(IPreC)和缺血后适应(IPostC)对心肌缺血/再氧化(I/R)损伤具有保护作用。然而,这两种干预措施可能引起不同程度的保护,表明不同的作用机制。这项研究评估了IPreC和IPostC联合使用是否比单独使用更能提供更好的保护。方法:选取50例右心耳患者,分别采用IPostC(1周期I/R为120秒和180秒)和IPreC(1周期缺血5分钟/再氧为5分钟)分别进行90 min缺血和120 min再氧合。以乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)释放量作为组织损伤指标,以3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基溴化四唑(MTT)还原量作为细胞活力指标。结果:结果显示,在一半的肌肉中,与单独干预相比,IPreC和IPostC联合使用减少了损伤,而在剩下的一半中,联合方法没有更大的效果。尽管如此,与单独的IPostC相比,IPreC的加入使受保护样本的数量增加了近20%。结论:结果表明IPreC和IPostC没有统一的反应,两种治疗联合使用可以改善心肌保护,但不能消除IPostC在某些情况下引起的进一步心肌损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of Combined Ischemic Pre- and Post-Conditioning to Protect the Human Myocardium
Objective: Ischemic pre-conditioning (IPreC) and post-conditioning (IPostC) protect the human myocardium against ischemia/reoxygenation (I/R) injury. However, the two interventions may induce variable degrees of protection, suggesting different mechanisms of action. This study assessed whether IPreC and IPostC confer greater protection when used in combination rather than individually. Methods: The right atrial appendages from 50 patients were subjected to 90 min of ischemia and 120 min of reoxygenation according to different protocols: IPostC (1 cycle of 120 and 180 sec of I/R) and IPreC (1 cycle of 5 min ischemia/5 min reoxygenation), alone and in combination. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release was measured as an index of tissue injury and 3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction as an index of cell viability. Results: The results showed that in one half of muscles the combined use of IPreC and IPostC reduced injury compared to either intervention alone whereas in the remaining half the combined approach had no greater effect. Nonetheless, the addition of IPreC to IPostC increased the number of protected samples by almost 20% compared to IPostC alone. Conclusion: The results demonstrate the lack of a uniform response to IPreC and IPostC and that the combined use of the two treatments improves protection although does not abolish the further myocardial injury that occurs in some instances in response to IPostC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信