现代创业型大学:本土理由与政治风险

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
K. Maltsev, A. Maltseva, L. Binkovskaya
{"title":"现代创业型大学:本土理由与政治风险","authors":"K. Maltsev, A. Maltseva, L. Binkovskaya","doi":"10.24923/2222-243x.2022-43.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions around the entrepreneurial \"university of excellence\" that replaced the \"university of modernity\" usually touch on one essential aspect: the need to \"preserve\" in a commercial firm, such as a modern university, those \"remnants\" of liberal education that are considered socially valuable (\"public good\"), politically significant (education of a citizen), necessary in theoretical (the specific form of knowledge and the peculiarities of teaching it) and methodological (the importance of philosophy as a methodology of sciences, in addition, the only one providing integration as interdisciplinarity) attitude. The article analyzes the arguments put forward by Lyotard in favor of the statement that a modern university in a \"postmodern situation\" is no longer capable of being a \"protected place\" (Collini) for knowledge: the legitimization of knowledge now has different sources and procedures than knowledge in a classical modern university. The main methods of politicization are studied (U. Bek) knowledge and university, undertaken in order to provide humanitarian knowledge and education a place in an entrepreneurial university. It is concluded that criticism of the current state of humanitarian knowledge and education does not matter either for university policy or for the public discourse of the university in market democracies.","PeriodicalId":41181,"journal":{"name":"Kant Yearbook","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern entrepreneurial university: ontic grounds and political risks\",\"authors\":\"K. Maltsev, A. Maltseva, L. Binkovskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.24923/2222-243x.2022-43.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussions around the entrepreneurial \\\"university of excellence\\\" that replaced the \\\"university of modernity\\\" usually touch on one essential aspect: the need to \\\"preserve\\\" in a commercial firm, such as a modern university, those \\\"remnants\\\" of liberal education that are considered socially valuable (\\\"public good\\\"), politically significant (education of a citizen), necessary in theoretical (the specific form of knowledge and the peculiarities of teaching it) and methodological (the importance of philosophy as a methodology of sciences, in addition, the only one providing integration as interdisciplinarity) attitude. The article analyzes the arguments put forward by Lyotard in favor of the statement that a modern university in a \\\"postmodern situation\\\" is no longer capable of being a \\\"protected place\\\" (Collini) for knowledge: the legitimization of knowledge now has different sources and procedures than knowledge in a classical modern university. The main methods of politicization are studied (U. Bek) knowledge and university, undertaken in order to provide humanitarian knowledge and education a place in an entrepreneurial university. It is concluded that criticism of the current state of humanitarian knowledge and education does not matter either for university policy or for the public discourse of the university in market democracies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kant Yearbook\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kant Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24923/2222-243x.2022-43.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kant Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24923/2222-243x.2022-43.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围绕取代“现代大学”的创业型“卓越大学”的讨论通常触及一个基本方面:在商业公司,如现代大学中,需要“保留”那些被认为具有社会价值(“公共利益”)、政治意义(公民教育)、理论(知识的特定形式和教学的特殊性)和方法论(哲学作为科学方法论的重要性,此外,唯一提供跨学科整合的学科)态度的自由教育的“残余”。本文分析了利奥塔提出的支持“后现代情境”下的现代大学不再能够成为知识的“保护地”(科里尼)的论点:与古典现代大学中的知识相比,现在知识的合法化有不同的来源和程序。研究了(U. Bek)知识与大学的主要政治化方法,以便在创业型大学中为人道主义知识和教育提供一席之地。结论是,对人道主义知识和教育现状的批评无论对大学政策还是对市场民主国家大学的公共话语都无关紧要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern entrepreneurial university: ontic grounds and political risks
Discussions around the entrepreneurial "university of excellence" that replaced the "university of modernity" usually touch on one essential aspect: the need to "preserve" in a commercial firm, such as a modern university, those "remnants" of liberal education that are considered socially valuable ("public good"), politically significant (education of a citizen), necessary in theoretical (the specific form of knowledge and the peculiarities of teaching it) and methodological (the importance of philosophy as a methodology of sciences, in addition, the only one providing integration as interdisciplinarity) attitude. The article analyzes the arguments put forward by Lyotard in favor of the statement that a modern university in a "postmodern situation" is no longer capable of being a "protected place" (Collini) for knowledge: the legitimization of knowledge now has different sources and procedures than knowledge in a classical modern university. The main methods of politicization are studied (U. Bek) knowledge and university, undertaken in order to provide humanitarian knowledge and education a place in an entrepreneurial university. It is concluded that criticism of the current state of humanitarian knowledge and education does not matter either for university policy or for the public discourse of the university in market democracies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kant Yearbook
Kant Yearbook PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Kant Yearbook is an international journal that publishes articles, historical or systematic, on the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It is the yearbook′s goal to intensify innovative research on Kant on the international scale. Articles are double-blind peer reviewed by an internationally renowned editorial board. Each issue is dedicated to a specific topic announced through a call for papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信