协同过滤推荐系统非个性化单启发式主动学习策略评估

Georges Chaaya, Elisabeth Métais, J. B. Abdo, Raja Chiky, J. Demerjian, K. Barbar
{"title":"协同过滤推荐系统非个性化单启发式主动学习策略评估","authors":"Georges Chaaya, Elisabeth Métais, J. B. Abdo, Raja Chiky, J. Demerjian, K. Barbar","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2017.00-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In collaborative filtering recommender systems, the users rate items, and this process helps in understanding their preferences. The systems can suffer from the cold-start problem, which refers to the absence or insufficiency of ratings for new users. This can be solved by using active learning strategies, which can be non-personalized or personalized, and which were evaluated and tested previously using different datasets and metrics. In this paper, we present a clearer study by implementing the main non-personalized single-heuristic strategies (random, popularity, co—coverage, variance, entropy, entropy0) on the same dataset, and by evaluating them using the same metrics, in order to have a better comparison. We use the public MovieLens dataset in the experimentations and the results show that the random strategy performs the worst, whereas the entropy0 leads to the best results. All strategies except the random strategy lead to very close results at a certain point, where ratings for almost the same items will have been elicited.","PeriodicalId":6636,"journal":{"name":"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"3 1","pages":"593-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Non-personalized Single-Heuristic Active Learning Strategies for Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems\",\"authors\":\"Georges Chaaya, Elisabeth Métais, J. B. Abdo, Raja Chiky, J. Demerjian, K. Barbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2017.00-96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In collaborative filtering recommender systems, the users rate items, and this process helps in understanding their preferences. The systems can suffer from the cold-start problem, which refers to the absence or insufficiency of ratings for new users. This can be solved by using active learning strategies, which can be non-personalized or personalized, and which were evaluated and tested previously using different datasets and metrics. In this paper, we present a clearer study by implementing the main non-personalized single-heuristic strategies (random, popularity, co—coverage, variance, entropy, entropy0) on the same dataset, and by evaluating them using the same metrics, in order to have a better comparison. We use the public MovieLens dataset in the experimentations and the results show that the random strategy performs the worst, whereas the entropy0 leads to the best results. All strategies except the random strategy lead to very close results at a certain point, where ratings for almost the same items will have been elicited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"593-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2017.00-96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2017.00-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在协同过滤推荐系统中,用户对项目进行评分,这个过程有助于了解他们的偏好。系统可能遭受冷启动问题,这是指对新用户的评级缺失或不足。这可以通过使用主动学习策略来解决,主动学习策略可以是非个性化的,也可以是个性化的,之前使用不同的数据集和指标对其进行了评估和测试。在本文中,我们通过在同一数据集上实现主要的非个性化单启发式策略(随机,流行,共同覆盖,方差,熵,熵),并通过使用相同的度量来评估它们,以便更好地进行比较,从而提出了一个更清晰的研究。我们在实验中使用了公开的MovieLens数据集,结果表明随机策略的效果最差,而熵值为0的结果最好。除了随机策略外,所有的策略都会在某一点上导致非常接近的结果,在这一点上,几乎相同的物品的评分将会被引出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Non-personalized Single-Heuristic Active Learning Strategies for Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems
In collaborative filtering recommender systems, the users rate items, and this process helps in understanding their preferences. The systems can suffer from the cold-start problem, which refers to the absence or insufficiency of ratings for new users. This can be solved by using active learning strategies, which can be non-personalized or personalized, and which were evaluated and tested previously using different datasets and metrics. In this paper, we present a clearer study by implementing the main non-personalized single-heuristic strategies (random, popularity, co—coverage, variance, entropy, entropy0) on the same dataset, and by evaluating them using the same metrics, in order to have a better comparison. We use the public MovieLens dataset in the experimentations and the results show that the random strategy performs the worst, whereas the entropy0 leads to the best results. All strategies except the random strategy lead to very close results at a certain point, where ratings for almost the same items will have been elicited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信