关注他人的意愿:社会偏好能预测注意力贡献吗?

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Ismaël Rafaï, M. Toumi
{"title":"关注他人的意愿:社会偏好能预测注意力贡献吗?","authors":"Ismaël Rafaï, M. Toumi","doi":"10.3917/REDP.285.0849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the relation between elicited social preferences and attentional contribution in a pro-social environment. For this purpose, we propose a new experiment, namely the ?dustbin task?, where subjects invest real attention to reduce uncertainty in a discrimination task. We compare three different incentivized environments where the subject?s accuracy: do not impact on thier or other subjects? payoffs (T0), impact their payoff only (Self-Interested treatment T1) and impact other subjects? payoff only (Prosocial treatment T2). Our results show that both incentives (T1?and T2) increase the amount of allocated attention, regardless of the subject?s intrinsic motivation. We elicited subject social preferences and find that they cannot explain attentional contribution in pro-social environments (T2). This latter result, in contradiction with economic theory, provides new insight about social-preferences and attention allocation.","PeriodicalId":44798,"journal":{"name":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","volume":"1 1","pages":"849-881"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to Pay Attention for Others: Do Social Preferences Predict Attentional Contribution?\",\"authors\":\"Ismaël Rafaï, M. Toumi\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/REDP.285.0849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the relation between elicited social preferences and attentional contribution in a pro-social environment. For this purpose, we propose a new experiment, namely the ?dustbin task?, where subjects invest real attention to reduce uncertainty in a discrimination task. We compare three different incentivized environments where the subject?s accuracy: do not impact on thier or other subjects? payoffs (T0), impact their payoff only (Self-Interested treatment T1) and impact other subjects? payoff only (Prosocial treatment T2). Our results show that both incentives (T1?and T2) increase the amount of allocated attention, regardless of the subject?s intrinsic motivation. We elicited subject social preferences and find that they cannot explain attentional contribution in pro-social environments (T2). This latter result, in contradiction with economic theory, provides new insight about social-preferences and attention allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"849-881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.285.0849\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.285.0849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究探讨了在亲社会环境中诱发的社会偏好与注意贡献之间的关系。为此,我们提出了一个新的实验,即“垃圾箱任务”。在这项研究中,受试者投入真正的注意力来减少歧视任务中的不确定性。我们比较了三种不同的激励环境,其中主体?准确性:对自己或其他科目没有影响?回报(T0),只影响他们的回报(自利治疗T1),并影响其他被试?只有回报(亲社会待遇T2)。我们的研究结果表明,两种激励(T1?T2)增加分配的注意力,无论主题是什么?S内在动机。我们引出了被试的社会偏好,发现它们不能解释亲社会环境下的注意贡献(T2)。后一种结果与经济理论相悖,为社会偏好和注意力分配提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Willingness to Pay Attention for Others: Do Social Preferences Predict Attentional Contribution?
We investigate the relation between elicited social preferences and attentional contribution in a pro-social environment. For this purpose, we propose a new experiment, namely the ?dustbin task?, where subjects invest real attention to reduce uncertainty in a discrimination task. We compare three different incentivized environments where the subject?s accuracy: do not impact on thier or other subjects? payoffs (T0), impact their payoff only (Self-Interested treatment T1) and impact other subjects? payoff only (Prosocial treatment T2). Our results show that both incentives (T1?and T2) increase the amount of allocated attention, regardless of the subject?s intrinsic motivation. We elicited subject social preferences and find that they cannot explain attentional contribution in pro-social environments (T2). This latter result, in contradiction with economic theory, provides new insight about social-preferences and attention allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信