Cobra -一个交互式静态代码分析器

G. Holzmann
{"title":"Cobra -一个交互式静态代码分析器","authors":"G. Holzmann","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sadly we know that virtually all software of any significance has residual errors. Some of those errors can be traced back to requirements flaws or faulty design assumptions; others are just plain coding mistakes. Static analyzers have become quite good at spotting these types of errors, but they don’t scale very well. If, for instance, you need to check a code base of a few million lines you better be prepared to wait for the result; sometimes hours. Eyeballing a large code base to find flaws is clearly not an option, so what is missing is a static analysis capability that can be used to answer common types of queries interactively, even for large code bases. I will describe the design and use of such a tool in this talk.","PeriodicalId":90522,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering workshops. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cobra - an interactive static code analyzer\",\"authors\":\"G. Holzmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sadly we know that virtually all software of any significance has residual errors. Some of those errors can be traced back to requirements flaws or faulty design assumptions; others are just plain coding mistakes. Static analyzers have become quite good at spotting these types of errors, but they don’t scale very well. If, for instance, you need to check a code base of a few million lines you better be prepared to wait for the result; sometimes hours. Eyeballing a large code base to find flaws is clearly not an option, so what is missing is a static analysis capability that can be used to answer common types of queries interactively, even for large code bases. I will describe the design and use of such a tool in this talk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering workshops. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering workshops. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering workshops. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可悲的是,我们知道几乎所有重要的软件都有残余错误。其中一些错误可以追溯到需求缺陷或错误的设计假设;还有一些只是简单的编码错误。静态分析器已经非常擅长发现这些类型的错误,但是它们不能很好地扩展。例如,如果你需要检查一个几百万行的代码库,你最好准备好等待结果;有时几个小时。通过观察大型代码库来发现缺陷显然不是一种选择,因此缺少的是静态分析功能,该功能可用于交互式地回答常见类型的查询,甚至对于大型代码库也是如此。我将在这次演讲中描述这样一个工具的设计和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cobra - an interactive static code analyzer
Sadly we know that virtually all software of any significance has residual errors. Some of those errors can be traced back to requirements flaws or faulty design assumptions; others are just plain coding mistakes. Static analyzers have become quite good at spotting these types of errors, but they don’t scale very well. If, for instance, you need to check a code base of a few million lines you better be prepared to wait for the result; sometimes hours. Eyeballing a large code base to find flaws is clearly not an option, so what is missing is a static analysis capability that can be used to answer common types of queries interactively, even for large code bases. I will describe the design and use of such a tool in this talk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信