社会流动性的统计模型

Q4 Social Sciences

Sociological Theory and Methods Pub Date : 2006-09-30 DOI:10.11218/OJJAMS.21.215

R. Breen

{"title":"社会流动性的统计模型","authors":"R. Breen","doi":"10.11218/OJJAMS.21.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypotheses about social fluidity in log-linear models of social mobility are hypotheses about patterns of odds ratios; yet odds ratios are only indirectly related to the interaction parameters of log-linear models. I propose rewriting such models so that the interaction parameters are equal to log odds ratios. This allows straightforward tests of difference and similarity between the odds ratios of different mobility tables. The approach is illustrated using three cross-nationally comparative data sets.","PeriodicalId":39496,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Theory and Methods","volume":"1 1","pages":"215-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Models of Social Fluidity\",\"authors\":\"R. Breen\",\"doi\":\"10.11218/OJJAMS.21.215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hypotheses about social fluidity in log-linear models of social mobility are hypotheses about patterns of odds ratios; yet odds ratios are only indirectly related to the interaction parameters of log-linear models. I propose rewriting such models so that the interaction parameters are equal to log odds ratios. This allows straightforward tests of difference and similarity between the odds ratios of different mobility tables. The approach is illustrated using three cross-nationally comparative data sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Theory and Methods\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"215-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Theory and Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11218/OJJAMS.21.215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Theory and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11218/OJJAMS.21.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

对数线性社会流动性模型中关于社会流动性的假设是关于优势比模式的假设;然而，优势比仅与对数线性模型的相互作用参数间接相关。我建议重写这样的模型，使交互参数等于对数比值比。这允许对不同流动性表的比值比之间的差异和相似性进行直接测试。该方法用三个跨国比较数据集加以说明。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Statistical Models of Social Fluidity

Hypotheses about social fluidity in log-linear models of social mobility are hypotheses about patterns of odds ratios; yet odds ratios are only indirectly related to the interaction parameters of log-linear models. I propose rewriting such models so that the interaction parameters are equal to log odds ratios. This allows straightforward tests of difference and similarity between the odds ratios of different mobility tables. The approach is illustrated using three cross-nationally comparative data sets.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sociological Theory and Methods Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量