一个不能创造出优秀团队的团队真的是低效的吗

Hong Chong Cho
{"title":"一个不能创造出优秀团队的团队真的是低效的吗","authors":"Hong Chong Cho","doi":"10.17256/JER.2012.17.3.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do people form social groups that do not produce a kind of group goods (public goods for the members only) nor directly increase the productivities of the members as firms or interest groups do? This study rationalizes such behaviors in order to gain more precise signals of the potential partner types in a transaction. Indeed, signal improving groups are individually rational to join for those with signals above a threshold level. Also, the groups are socially desirable in that they increase the chances of more profitable transactions.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"24 1","pages":"223-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is a Group that Does Not Produce a Group Good Really Unproductive\",\"authors\":\"Hong Chong Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.17256/JER.2012.17.3.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why do people form social groups that do not produce a kind of group goods (public goods for the members only) nor directly increase the productivities of the members as firms or interest groups do? This study rationalizes such behaviors in order to gain more precise signals of the potential partner types in a transaction. Indeed, signal improving groups are individually rational to join for those with signals above a threshold level. Also, the groups are socially desirable in that they increase the chances of more profitable transactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"223-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2012.17.3.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2012.17.3.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么人们组成的社会群体不生产某种群体产品(仅为成员提供公共产品),也不像企业或利益集团那样直接提高成员的生产率?本研究将这些行为合理化,以获得交易中潜在合作伙伴类型的更精确信号。事实上,信号改善小组对于那些信号高于阈值水平的人来说,加入是理性的。此外,这些团体在社会上是可取的,因为它们增加了更有利可图的交易的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is a Group that Does Not Produce a Group Good Really Unproductive
Why do people form social groups that do not produce a kind of group goods (public goods for the members only) nor directly increase the productivities of the members as firms or interest groups do? This study rationalizes such behaviors in order to gain more precise signals of the potential partner types in a transaction. Indeed, signal improving groups are individually rational to join for those with signals above a threshold level. Also, the groups are socially desirable in that they increase the chances of more profitable transactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信