统一生物实地观测,以检测和比较海洋酸化对海洋物种和生态系统的影响:监测什么以及为什么要监测

IF 4.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
S. Widdicombe, K. Isensee, Y. Artioli, J. Gaitán‐Espitia, C. Hauri, J. Newton, M. Wells, S. Dupont
{"title":"统一生物实地观测,以检测和比较海洋酸化对海洋物种和生态系统的影响:监测什么以及为什么要监测","authors":"S. Widdicombe, K. Isensee, Y. Artioli, J. Gaitán‐Espitia, C. Hauri, J. Newton, M. Wells, S. Dupont","doi":"10.5194/os-19-101-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Approximately one-quarter of the CO2 emitted to the\natmosphere annually from human activities is absorbed by the ocean,\nresulting in a reduction of seawater pH and shifts in seawater carbonate\nchemistry. This multi-decadal process, termed “anthropogenic ocean\nacidification” (OA), has been shown to have detrimental impacts on marine\necosystems. Recent years have seen a globally coordinated effort to measure\nthe changes in seawater chemistry caused by OA, with best practices now\navailable for these measurements. In contrast to these substantial advances\nin observing physicochemical changes due to OA, quantifying their\nbiological consequences remains challenging, especially from in situ\nobservations under real-world conditions. Results from 2 decades of\ncontrolled laboratory experiments on OA have given insight into the likely\nprocesses and mechanisms by which elevated CO2 levels affect biological\nprocess, but the manifestation of these process across a plethora of natural\nsituations has yet to be fully explored. This challenge requires us to\nidentify a set of fundamental biological and ecological indicators that are\n(i) relevant across all marine ecosystems, (ii) have a strongly demonstrated\nlink to OA, and (iii) have implications for ocean health and the provision of\necosystem services with impacts on local marine management strategies and\neconomies. This paper draws on the understanding of biological impacts\nprovided by the wealth of previous experiments, as well as the findings of\nrecent meta-analyses, to propose five broad classes of biological indicators\nthat, when coupled with environmental observations including carbonate\nchemistry, would allow the rate and severity of biological change in\nresponse to OA to be observed and compared. These broad indicators are\napplicable to different ecological systems, and the methods for data\nanalysis suggested here would allow researchers to combine biological\nresponse data across regional and global scales by correlating rates of\nbiological change with the rate of change in carbonate chemistry parameters.\nMoreover, a method using laboratory observation to design an optimal\nobserving strategy (frequency and duration) and observe meaningful\nbiological rates of change highlights the factors that need to be considered\nwhen applying our proposed observation strategy. This innovative observing\nmethodology allows inclusion of a wide diversity of marine ecosystems in\nregional and global assessments and has the potential to increase the\ncontribution of OA observations from countries with developing OA science\ncapacity.\n","PeriodicalId":19535,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unifying biological field observations to detect and compare ocean acidification impacts across marine species and ecosystems: what to monitor and why\",\"authors\":\"S. Widdicombe, K. Isensee, Y. Artioli, J. Gaitán‐Espitia, C. Hauri, J. Newton, M. Wells, S. Dupont\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/os-19-101-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Approximately one-quarter of the CO2 emitted to the\\natmosphere annually from human activities is absorbed by the ocean,\\nresulting in a reduction of seawater pH and shifts in seawater carbonate\\nchemistry. This multi-decadal process, termed “anthropogenic ocean\\nacidification” (OA), has been shown to have detrimental impacts on marine\\necosystems. Recent years have seen a globally coordinated effort to measure\\nthe changes in seawater chemistry caused by OA, with best practices now\\navailable for these measurements. In contrast to these substantial advances\\nin observing physicochemical changes due to OA, quantifying their\\nbiological consequences remains challenging, especially from in situ\\nobservations under real-world conditions. Results from 2 decades of\\ncontrolled laboratory experiments on OA have given insight into the likely\\nprocesses and mechanisms by which elevated CO2 levels affect biological\\nprocess, but the manifestation of these process across a plethora of natural\\nsituations has yet to be fully explored. This challenge requires us to\\nidentify a set of fundamental biological and ecological indicators that are\\n(i) relevant across all marine ecosystems, (ii) have a strongly demonstrated\\nlink to OA, and (iii) have implications for ocean health and the provision of\\necosystem services with impacts on local marine management strategies and\\neconomies. This paper draws on the understanding of biological impacts\\nprovided by the wealth of previous experiments, as well as the findings of\\nrecent meta-analyses, to propose five broad classes of biological indicators\\nthat, when coupled with environmental observations including carbonate\\nchemistry, would allow the rate and severity of biological change in\\nresponse to OA to be observed and compared. These broad indicators are\\napplicable to different ecological systems, and the methods for data\\nanalysis suggested here would allow researchers to combine biological\\nresponse data across regional and global scales by correlating rates of\\nbiological change with the rate of change in carbonate chemistry parameters.\\nMoreover, a method using laboratory observation to design an optimal\\nobserving strategy (frequency and duration) and observe meaningful\\nbiological rates of change highlights the factors that need to be considered\\nwhen applying our proposed observation strategy. This innovative observing\\nmethodology allows inclusion of a wide diversity of marine ecosystems in\\nregional and global assessments and has the potential to increase the\\ncontribution of OA observations from countries with developing OA science\\ncapacity.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-101-2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-101-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要每年人类活动排放到大气中的二氧化碳约有四分之一被海洋吸收,导致海水pH值降低,海水碳化学成分发生变化。这一多年代际过程被称为“人为海洋酸化”(OA),已被证明对海洋生态系统产生有害影响。近年来,在测量由OA引起的海水化学变化方面,全球开展了协调一致的努力,目前已有这些测量的最佳实践。与观察OA引起的物理化学变化的这些实质性进展相比,量化其生物学后果仍然具有挑战性,特别是在现实条件下的现场观察。20年来对OA进行的受控实验室实验的结果已经深入了解了二氧化碳水平升高影响生物过程的可能过程和机制,但这些过程在大量自然情况下的表现尚未得到充分探索。这一挑战要求我们确定一套基本的生物和生态指标,这些指标(i)与所有海洋生态系统相关,(ii)与OA有明显的联系,(iii)对海洋健康和生态系统服务的提供有影响,对当地海洋管理战略和经济有影响。本文借鉴了以往丰富的实验提供的对生物影响的理解,以及最近的荟萃分析的发现,提出了五大类生物指标,当与包括碳酸化学在内的环境观测相结合时,将允许观察和比较OA响应的生物变化的速度和严重程度。这些广泛的指标适用于不同的生态系统,这里提出的数据分析方法将允许研究人员通过将生物变化速率与碳酸盐化学参数变化速率相关联,将区域和全球尺度上的生物响应数据结合起来。此外,使用实验室观察设计最佳观察策略(频率和持续时间)和观察有意义的生物学变化率的方法强调了在应用我们提出的观察策略时需要考虑的因素。这种创新的观测方法允许将海洋生态系统的广泛多样性纳入区域和全球评估,并有可能增加OA科学能力发展中国家OA观测的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unifying biological field observations to detect and compare ocean acidification impacts across marine species and ecosystems: what to monitor and why
Abstract. Approximately one-quarter of the CO2 emitted to the atmosphere annually from human activities is absorbed by the ocean, resulting in a reduction of seawater pH and shifts in seawater carbonate chemistry. This multi-decadal process, termed “anthropogenic ocean acidification” (OA), has been shown to have detrimental impacts on marine ecosystems. Recent years have seen a globally coordinated effort to measure the changes in seawater chemistry caused by OA, with best practices now available for these measurements. In contrast to these substantial advances in observing physicochemical changes due to OA, quantifying their biological consequences remains challenging, especially from in situ observations under real-world conditions. Results from 2 decades of controlled laboratory experiments on OA have given insight into the likely processes and mechanisms by which elevated CO2 levels affect biological process, but the manifestation of these process across a plethora of natural situations has yet to be fully explored. This challenge requires us to identify a set of fundamental biological and ecological indicators that are (i) relevant across all marine ecosystems, (ii) have a strongly demonstrated link to OA, and (iii) have implications for ocean health and the provision of ecosystem services with impacts on local marine management strategies and economies. This paper draws on the understanding of biological impacts provided by the wealth of previous experiments, as well as the findings of recent meta-analyses, to propose five broad classes of biological indicators that, when coupled with environmental observations including carbonate chemistry, would allow the rate and severity of biological change in response to OA to be observed and compared. These broad indicators are applicable to different ecological systems, and the methods for data analysis suggested here would allow researchers to combine biological response data across regional and global scales by correlating rates of biological change with the rate of change in carbonate chemistry parameters. Moreover, a method using laboratory observation to design an optimal observing strategy (frequency and duration) and observe meaningful biological rates of change highlights the factors that need to be considered when applying our proposed observation strategy. This innovative observing methodology allows inclusion of a wide diversity of marine ecosystems in regional and global assessments and has the potential to increase the contribution of OA observations from countries with developing OA science capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Science
Ocean Science 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocean Science (OS) is a not-for-profit international open-access scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of ocean science: experimental, theoretical, and laboratory. The primary objective is to publish a very high-quality scientific journal with free Internet-based access for researchers and other interested people throughout the world. Electronic submission of articles is used to keep publication costs to a minimum. The costs will be covered by a moderate per-page charge paid by the authors. The peer-review process also makes use of the Internet. It includes an 8-week online discussion period with the original submitted manuscript and all comments. If accepted, the final revised paper will be published online. Ocean Science covers the following fields: ocean physics (i.e. ocean structure, circulation, tides, and internal waves); ocean chemistry; biological oceanography; air–sea interactions; ocean models – physical, chemical, biological, and biochemical; coastal and shelf edge processes; paleooceanography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信