巴基斯坦海得拉巴金黄色葡萄球菌氨基糖苷耐药模式

A. A. Patoli, B. Patoli, S. Jabeen, A. Memon
{"title":"巴基斯坦海得拉巴金黄色葡萄球菌氨基糖苷耐药模式","authors":"A. A. Patoli, B. Patoli, S. Jabeen, A. Memon","doi":"10.26692/surj/2019.12.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 118 Staphylococcusaureus isolates from various clinical and non-clinical sources were processed for the determination of antibiotic resistance against a set of aminoglycoside group of antibiotics. In this study,44% (n=52) isolates were from various clinical specimens i.e. pus, blood and nose, while 56% (n=66) were recovered from the skin surfaces of healthy volunteers representing the non-clinical isolates. The highest percentage of resistance among both clinical and non-clinical isolates was observed against Neomycin (i.e. clinical = 86.5%, non-clinical = 39.3%). The lowest percentage of resistance among both clinical and non-clinical isolates was observed against Gentamycin (i.e. clinical = 34.6%, non-clinical = 4.5%). The percentage of difference for Amikacin, Gentamycin and To bramycin resistance between clinical non-clinical isolates was observed to be more than 100. The Odd Ratio for Amikacin, Gentamycin and Tobramycin resistance between clinical and non-clinical isolates was 17.75, 11.12, and 20.59, respectively while the p-values were determined as 0.0001 in all the three cases, suggesting a significant association of Amikacin, Gentamycin and Tobramycin resistance with clinical S.aureusisolates.","PeriodicalId":21859,"journal":{"name":"Sindh University Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aminoglycoside Resistance Pattern in Staphylococcus aureusat Hyderabad, Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Patoli, B. Patoli, S. Jabeen, A. Memon\",\"doi\":\"10.26692/surj/2019.12.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A total of 118 Staphylococcusaureus isolates from various clinical and non-clinical sources were processed for the determination of antibiotic resistance against a set of aminoglycoside group of antibiotics. In this study,44% (n=52) isolates were from various clinical specimens i.e. pus, blood and nose, while 56% (n=66) were recovered from the skin surfaces of healthy volunteers representing the non-clinical isolates. The highest percentage of resistance among both clinical and non-clinical isolates was observed against Neomycin (i.e. clinical = 86.5%, non-clinical = 39.3%). The lowest percentage of resistance among both clinical and non-clinical isolates was observed against Gentamycin (i.e. clinical = 34.6%, non-clinical = 4.5%). The percentage of difference for Amikacin, Gentamycin and To bramycin resistance between clinical non-clinical isolates was observed to be more than 100. The Odd Ratio for Amikacin, Gentamycin and Tobramycin resistance between clinical and non-clinical isolates was 17.75, 11.12, and 20.59, respectively while the p-values were determined as 0.0001 in all the three cases, suggesting a significant association of Amikacin, Gentamycin and Tobramycin resistance with clinical S.aureusisolates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sindh University Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sindh University Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26692/surj/2019.12.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sindh University Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26692/surj/2019.12.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对118株不同临床和非临床来源的金黄色葡萄球菌进行耐药性测定。在本研究中,44% (n=52)的分离株来自各种临床标本,如脓、血液和鼻子,而56% (n=66)的分离株来自健康志愿者的皮肤表面,代表非临床分离株。临床和非临床分离株对新霉素的耐药率最高(临床= 86.5%,非临床= 39.3%)。临床和非临床分离株对庆大霉素的耐药率最低(临床= 34.6%,非临床= 4.5%)。临床非临床分离株对阿米卡星、庆大霉素和托布霉素的耐药百分率差异大于100。临床与非临床分离株对阿米卡星、庆大霉素和Tobramycin的耐药率奇比分别为17.75、11.12和20.59,p值均为0.0001,说明临床分离株对阿米卡星、庆大霉素和Tobramycin的耐药率与临床金黄色葡萄球菌有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aminoglycoside Resistance Pattern in Staphylococcus aureusat Hyderabad, Pakistan
A total of 118 Staphylococcusaureus isolates from various clinical and non-clinical sources were processed for the determination of antibiotic resistance against a set of aminoglycoside group of antibiotics. In this study,44% (n=52) isolates were from various clinical specimens i.e. pus, blood and nose, while 56% (n=66) were recovered from the skin surfaces of healthy volunteers representing the non-clinical isolates. The highest percentage of resistance among both clinical and non-clinical isolates was observed against Neomycin (i.e. clinical = 86.5%, non-clinical = 39.3%). The lowest percentage of resistance among both clinical and non-clinical isolates was observed against Gentamycin (i.e. clinical = 34.6%, non-clinical = 4.5%). The percentage of difference for Amikacin, Gentamycin and To bramycin resistance between clinical non-clinical isolates was observed to be more than 100. The Odd Ratio for Amikacin, Gentamycin and Tobramycin resistance between clinical and non-clinical isolates was 17.75, 11.12, and 20.59, respectively while the p-values were determined as 0.0001 in all the three cases, suggesting a significant association of Amikacin, Gentamycin and Tobramycin resistance with clinical S.aureusisolates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信