4CPS-374一种筛选模型,以确定可能受益于住院期间药师主导的用药审查的老年多药患者

Trh Andersen, MP Von Hallas, LM Weisbjerg, L. Petersen
{"title":"4CPS-374一种筛选模型,以确定可能受益于住院期间药师主导的用药审查的老年多药患者","authors":"Trh Andersen, MP Von Hallas, LM Weisbjerg, L. Petersen","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance The National Health Authority calls for initiatives ensuring that relevant elderly polypharmacy patients receive medication reviews during hospital admission to reduce the risk of adverse events. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are one of the most frequent causes of adverse events in older people. Pharmacist led systematic medication reviews are time consuming, and while hospital length of stay has progressively reduced to an average of a few days, the effort has to be aimed at PIM interventions that are best suited to being carried out by a hospital physician. Aim and objectives The purpose of the study was to develop a screening model to identify patients who may benefit from a pharmacist led medication review in hospital. Material and methods A screening model was developed using PIMs described in the international literature and the workflow of pharmaconomists and clinical pharmacists in local hospitals. The screening model was applied to all elderly polypharmacy patients admitted to bed wards having pharmaconomist medicine management in five hospitals. Patients fitting the model were identified by pharmaconomists and referred to a pharmacist led medication review. The pharmacist led medication review was performed centrally with the aim of reducing the number of drugs, number of PIMs and complexity of the medication regimen. The primary outcome was the number of PIMs at discharge compared with the number of PIMs at admission to hospital. Results The screening tool in the model comprised 10 medication focus points and demonstrated a specificity of 78% and sensitivity of 80% in detecting the relevant patients when applied to a cohort of elderly polypharmacy patients. From April to June 2018, 17 631 patients were screened using the tool. The pharmaconomists referred 396 patients to the pharmacists (average age 78 years, 52% women). Of these, 229 received a pharmacist led medication review (average of 2.78 interventions/patient). For the 115 patients with a possible follow-up, the average number of PIMs/patient was significantly reduced (p Conclusion and relevance The screening model developed detected relevant elderly polypharmacy patients for a pharmacist led medication review during hospital admission. The model was easily implemented, low resource and resulted in a significantly reduced number of potentially inappropriate medications. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4CPS-374 A screening model to identify elderly polypharmacy patients that may benefit from pharmacist led medication review during hospital admission\",\"authors\":\"Trh Andersen, MP Von Hallas, LM Weisbjerg, L. Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importance The National Health Authority calls for initiatives ensuring that relevant elderly polypharmacy patients receive medication reviews during hospital admission to reduce the risk of adverse events. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are one of the most frequent causes of adverse events in older people. Pharmacist led systematic medication reviews are time consuming, and while hospital length of stay has progressively reduced to an average of a few days, the effort has to be aimed at PIM interventions that are best suited to being carried out by a hospital physician. Aim and objectives The purpose of the study was to develop a screening model to identify patients who may benefit from a pharmacist led medication review in hospital. Material and methods A screening model was developed using PIMs described in the international literature and the workflow of pharmaconomists and clinical pharmacists in local hospitals. The screening model was applied to all elderly polypharmacy patients admitted to bed wards having pharmaconomist medicine management in five hospitals. Patients fitting the model were identified by pharmaconomists and referred to a pharmacist led medication review. The pharmacist led medication review was performed centrally with the aim of reducing the number of drugs, number of PIMs and complexity of the medication regimen. The primary outcome was the number of PIMs at discharge compared with the number of PIMs at admission to hospital. Results The screening tool in the model comprised 10 medication focus points and demonstrated a specificity of 78% and sensitivity of 80% in detecting the relevant patients when applied to a cohort of elderly polypharmacy patients. From April to June 2018, 17 631 patients were screened using the tool. The pharmaconomists referred 396 patients to the pharmacists (average age 78 years, 52% women). Of these, 229 received a pharmacist led medication review (average of 2.78 interventions/patient). For the 115 patients with a possible follow-up, the average number of PIMs/patient was significantly reduced (p Conclusion and relevance The screening model developed detected relevant elderly polypharmacy patients for a pharmacist led medication review during hospital admission. The model was easily implemented, low resource and resulted in a significantly reduced number of potentially inappropriate medications. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":11998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性国家卫生局呼吁采取行动,确保相关的老年综合用药患者在住院期间接受药物审查,以减少不良事件的风险。潜在不适当药物(PIMs)是老年人不良事件最常见的原因之一。药剂师主导的系统药物审查是耗时的,虽然住院时间逐渐减少到平均几天,但必须努力针对最适合由医院医生进行的PIM干预措施。目的和目的本研究的目的是建立一种筛选模型,以确定可能从医院药剂师主导的药物审查中受益的患者。材料和方法利用国际文献中描述的pim和当地医院药理学家和临床药师的工作流程建立筛选模型。将筛选模型应用于5家医院药理学药物管理床位病房的老年综合用药患者。符合模型的患者由药理学家确定,并提交给药剂师领导的药物审查。由药师主导的用药审查集中进行,目的是减少药物数量,减少pim数量,降低用药方案的复杂性。主要结果是出院时的PIMs数量与入院时的PIMs数量的比较。结果模型中的筛选工具包含10个用药重点,在老年多药患者队列中检测相关患者的特异性为78%,敏感性为80%。2018年4月至6月,使用该工具筛查了17 631例患者。药理学家将396例患者转介给药师(平均年龄78岁,女性52%)。其中,229人接受了药剂师主导的药物审查(平均2.78次干预/患者)。对于可能随访的115例患者,平均每例患者的PIMs数量显著减少(p)结论及相关性所建立的筛选模型在住院期间检测出相关的老年多药患者进行药师主导的用药审查。该模型易于实施,资源少,并显著减少了潜在不适当药物的数量。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
4CPS-374 A screening model to identify elderly polypharmacy patients that may benefit from pharmacist led medication review during hospital admission
Background and importance The National Health Authority calls for initiatives ensuring that relevant elderly polypharmacy patients receive medication reviews during hospital admission to reduce the risk of adverse events. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are one of the most frequent causes of adverse events in older people. Pharmacist led systematic medication reviews are time consuming, and while hospital length of stay has progressively reduced to an average of a few days, the effort has to be aimed at PIM interventions that are best suited to being carried out by a hospital physician. Aim and objectives The purpose of the study was to develop a screening model to identify patients who may benefit from a pharmacist led medication review in hospital. Material and methods A screening model was developed using PIMs described in the international literature and the workflow of pharmaconomists and clinical pharmacists in local hospitals. The screening model was applied to all elderly polypharmacy patients admitted to bed wards having pharmaconomist medicine management in five hospitals. Patients fitting the model were identified by pharmaconomists and referred to a pharmacist led medication review. The pharmacist led medication review was performed centrally with the aim of reducing the number of drugs, number of PIMs and complexity of the medication regimen. The primary outcome was the number of PIMs at discharge compared with the number of PIMs at admission to hospital. Results The screening tool in the model comprised 10 medication focus points and demonstrated a specificity of 78% and sensitivity of 80% in detecting the relevant patients when applied to a cohort of elderly polypharmacy patients. From April to June 2018, 17 631 patients were screened using the tool. The pharmaconomists referred 396 patients to the pharmacists (average age 78 years, 52% women). Of these, 229 received a pharmacist led medication review (average of 2.78 interventions/patient). For the 115 patients with a possible follow-up, the average number of PIMs/patient was significantly reduced (p Conclusion and relevance The screening model developed detected relevant elderly polypharmacy patients for a pharmacist led medication review during hospital admission. The model was easily implemented, low resource and resulted in a significantly reduced number of potentially inappropriate medications. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信