作为借口的人类学历史:方法论对史学差异的影响

Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares Pub Date : 2020-04-29 DOI:10.3989/RDTP.1990.V45.I1.209

F. C. Urbano

{"title":"作为借口的人类学历史:方法论对史学差异的影响","authors":"F. C. Urbano","doi":"10.3989/RDTP.1990.V45.I1.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of anthropology has tradicionally been studied by anthropologists no longer actively involved in fieldwork, who have used it to put forward their own methodological positions. The result has been the wide variety of different versions of that history. Only a history of anthropology written by historians, regardless of whether they come from anthropology or the history of science, will be able to make the hisrory of anthropology an objective discipline.","PeriodicalId":30257,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","volume":"21 1","pages":"21-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La historia de la antropología como excusa: la influencia de la metodología en la disparidad historiográfica\",\"authors\":\"F. C. Urbano\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/RDTP.1990.V45.I1.209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The history of anthropology has tradicionally been studied by anthropologists no longer actively involved in fieldwork, who have used it to put forward their own methodological positions. The result has been the wide variety of different versions of that history. Only a history of anthropology written by historians, regardless of whether they come from anthropology or the history of science, will be able to make the hisrory of anthropology an objective discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"21-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1990.V45.I1.209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1990.V45.I1.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人类学的历史传统上是由不再积极参与田野调查的人类学家研究的，他们利用它来提出自己的方法论立场。其结果是这段历史的各种不同版本。只有由历史学家撰写的人类学史，无论他们来自人类学还是科学史，才能使人类学史成为一门客观的学科。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

La historia de la antropología como excusa: la influencia de la metodología en la disparidad historiográfica

The history of anthropology has tradicionally been studied by anthropologists no longer actively involved in fieldwork, who have used it to put forward their own methodological positions. The result has been the wide variety of different versions of that history. Only a history of anthropology written by historians, regardless of whether they come from anthropology or the history of science, will be able to make the hisrory of anthropology an objective discipline.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Established in 1944, Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares is presently the longest standing Spanish Journal devoted to social and cultural anthropology, publishing scholarly work on human matters such as mentalities, religion, kinship, social relationships and representations, material culture, oral literature, dialectal lexicon and all other related subjects of anthropological research. Regular sections include major Articles, Notes, Archival Documents and Book Reviews. Aimed at a learned readership, it publishes original contributions to anthropological knowledge while enriching scholarly debate, especially on theoretical and methodological questions as well as on ethnographic fieldwork.