北马其顿和俄罗斯的私人养老基金

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Marija Ampovska, E. Kilinkarova, Kristina Misheva, Fatima K. Nogaylieva, M. D. Polenchuk
{"title":"北马其顿和俄罗斯的私人养老基金","authors":"Marija Ampovska, E. Kilinkarova, Kristina Misheva, Fatima K. Nogaylieva, M. D. Polenchuk","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the reform of the pension systems in North Macedonia and Russia, which resulted in switch from one-pillar to multi-pillar pension systems, and current legal and institutional architecture in both legal systems with emphasis on private pension funds which are widely recognized as the core drivers for the improvement of the living standards of retirees. The article starts with the general overview of Macedonian and Russian pension systems which provides the necessary background for understanding of the legal regime of private pension funds. The general overview of the pension systems is followed by the detailed analysis of the legal status of private pension funds in both countries, with more attention being paid to the experience of North Macedonia where private pension funds play a more important role in the pension system. In Russia private pension funds have shown their positive effect, but their coverage in general is still moderate. The overview of general rules of taxation of contributions to private pension funds and pensions concludes the article. The comparative research allowed to make the conclusion that both countries have made different progress in moving to a three-pillar pension system especially from the viewpoint of the established legal and institutional framework, and the establishment and operation of the private funds, both mandatory and voluntary.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private pensions funds in North Macedonia and Russia\",\"authors\":\"Marija Ampovska, E. Kilinkarova, Kristina Misheva, Fatima K. Nogaylieva, M. D. Polenchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2022.309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on the reform of the pension systems in North Macedonia and Russia, which resulted in switch from one-pillar to multi-pillar pension systems, and current legal and institutional architecture in both legal systems with emphasis on private pension funds which are widely recognized as the core drivers for the improvement of the living standards of retirees. The article starts with the general overview of Macedonian and Russian pension systems which provides the necessary background for understanding of the legal regime of private pension funds. The general overview of the pension systems is followed by the detailed analysis of the legal status of private pension funds in both countries, with more attention being paid to the experience of North Macedonia where private pension funds play a more important role in the pension system. In Russia private pension funds have shown their positive effect, but their coverage in general is still moderate. The overview of general rules of taxation of contributions to private pension funds and pensions concludes the article. The comparative research allowed to make the conclusion that both countries have made different progress in moving to a three-pillar pension system especially from the viewpoint of the established legal and institutional framework, and the establishment and operation of the private funds, both mandatory and voluntary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点关注北马其顿和俄罗斯的养老金制度改革,这导致了从单一支柱到多支柱的养老金制度的转变,以及这两个法律体系的现行法律和制度架构,重点是私人养老基金,这被广泛认为是提高退休人员生活水平的核心驱动因素。文章从马其顿和俄罗斯养老金制度的总体概述开始,为了解私人养老基金的法律制度提供了必要的背景。在对养老金制度进行总体概述之后,详细分析了两国私人养老基金的法律地位,并更多地关注了北马其顿的经验,在那里私人养老基金在养老金制度中发挥了更重要的作用。在俄罗斯,私人养老基金已经显示出积极的作用,但其覆盖范围总体上仍然是温和的。对私人养恤基金和养恤金缴款的一般征税规则的概述结束了文章。通过比较研究可以得出结论,两国在向三支柱养老金制度过渡方面取得了不同的进展,特别是从已建立的法律和制度框架以及强制性和自愿性私人基金的建立和运作的角度来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private pensions funds in North Macedonia and Russia
The article focuses on the reform of the pension systems in North Macedonia and Russia, which resulted in switch from one-pillar to multi-pillar pension systems, and current legal and institutional architecture in both legal systems with emphasis on private pension funds which are widely recognized as the core drivers for the improvement of the living standards of retirees. The article starts with the general overview of Macedonian and Russian pension systems which provides the necessary background for understanding of the legal regime of private pension funds. The general overview of the pension systems is followed by the detailed analysis of the legal status of private pension funds in both countries, with more attention being paid to the experience of North Macedonia where private pension funds play a more important role in the pension system. In Russia private pension funds have shown their positive effect, but their coverage in general is still moderate. The overview of general rules of taxation of contributions to private pension funds and pensions concludes the article. The comparative research allowed to make the conclusion that both countries have made different progress in moving to a three-pillar pension system especially from the viewpoint of the established legal and institutional framework, and the establishment and operation of the private funds, both mandatory and voluntary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信