非小细胞肺癌化疗反应和生存的预后因素:来自现实世界实践的数据与有限的新疗法

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"非小细胞肺癌化疗反应和生存的预后因素:来自现实世界实践的数据与有限的新疗法","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.06.13853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chemotherapy is a backbone treatment in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for non-targetable mutations and inaccessible to novel therapies. However, the data on the response rate, factors of chemotherapy response, and survival in Thailand are limited.\n\nObjective: To find the chemotherapy response rate, factors that predict chemotherapy response and survival in advanced-stage NSCLC.\n\nMaterials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed by including advanced-stage NSCLC patients older than 18 years old who received chemotherapy at the medical oncology unit, Sawanpracharak Hospital between July 2014 and January 2020. Demographic data, laboratory data, details of treatment, computed tomography (CT) of chest, and survival time were collected. Descriptive statistical analyses followed by univariable and multivariable were performed to determine factors associated with chemotherapy response. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate overall survival (OS), and the log-rank test was performed to compare survival differences in each group. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression method was adopted for OS.\n\nResults: Tree hundred four chemotherapy-treated advanced-stage NSCLC were included. The chemotherapy response rate was 45.5%, and ECOG 0-1 was a favorable prognosis for chemotherapy response (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.480 to 7.370, p=0.004). Pericardial metastasis (HR 1.833, 95% CI 1.102 to 3.215, p=0.021), liver metastasis (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.131 to 3.201, p=0.002), non-objective response rate (ORR) for chemotherapy (HR 1.429, 95% CI 1.099 to 1.859, p=0.008) were worse prognosis factors. Obtaining second-line and third-line systemic treatment were favorable prognoses of survival in advanced-stage NSCLC (HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.348 to 0.651, p<0.001 and HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.123 to 0.494, p<0.001, respectively).\n\nConclusion: The response rate in chemotherapy-treated advanced-stage NSCLC was 45.5%. ECOG 0-1 was an independent factor in chemotherapy response. Liver metastasis, pericardial metastasis, no subsequent treatment, and poor response to chemotherapy were worse prognosis outcomes in advanced-stage NSCLC.\n\nKeywords: NSCLC; Advanced-stage; Factor of chemotherapy response; Factor of survival","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Factors of Chemotherapy Response and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Data from Real-World Practice with Limited Access to Novel Therapy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.06.13853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chemotherapy is a backbone treatment in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for non-targetable mutations and inaccessible to novel therapies. However, the data on the response rate, factors of chemotherapy response, and survival in Thailand are limited.\\n\\nObjective: To find the chemotherapy response rate, factors that predict chemotherapy response and survival in advanced-stage NSCLC.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed by including advanced-stage NSCLC patients older than 18 years old who received chemotherapy at the medical oncology unit, Sawanpracharak Hospital between July 2014 and January 2020. Demographic data, laboratory data, details of treatment, computed tomography (CT) of chest, and survival time were collected. Descriptive statistical analyses followed by univariable and multivariable were performed to determine factors associated with chemotherapy response. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate overall survival (OS), and the log-rank test was performed to compare survival differences in each group. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression method was adopted for OS.\\n\\nResults: Tree hundred four chemotherapy-treated advanced-stage NSCLC were included. The chemotherapy response rate was 45.5%, and ECOG 0-1 was a favorable prognosis for chemotherapy response (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.480 to 7.370, p=0.004). Pericardial metastasis (HR 1.833, 95% CI 1.102 to 3.215, p=0.021), liver metastasis (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.131 to 3.201, p=0.002), non-objective response rate (ORR) for chemotherapy (HR 1.429, 95% CI 1.099 to 1.859, p=0.008) were worse prognosis factors. Obtaining second-line and third-line systemic treatment were favorable prognoses of survival in advanced-stage NSCLC (HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.348 to 0.651, p<0.001 and HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.123 to 0.494, p<0.001, respectively).\\n\\nConclusion: The response rate in chemotherapy-treated advanced-stage NSCLC was 45.5%. ECOG 0-1 was an independent factor in chemotherapy response. Liver metastasis, pericardial metastasis, no subsequent treatment, and poor response to chemotherapy were worse prognosis outcomes in advanced-stage NSCLC.\\n\\nKeywords: NSCLC; Advanced-stage; Factor of chemotherapy response; Factor of survival\",\"PeriodicalId\":17486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.06.13853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.06.13853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:化疗是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)非靶向突变和难以获得新疗法的主要治疗方法。然而,有关泰国的反应率、化疗反应因素和生存率的数据有限。目的:探讨晚期非小细胞肺癌的化疗反应率、影响化疗反应的因素及生存期。材料和方法:回顾性队列研究纳入2014年7月至2020年1月期间在Sawanpracharak医院内科肿瘤科接受化疗的18岁以上晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。收集患者的人口学资料、实验室资料、治疗细节、胸部CT及生存时间。描述性统计分析,然后进行单变量和多变量分析,以确定与化疗反应相关的因素。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线估计总生存期(OS),采用log-rank检验比较各组的生存差异。OS采用单变量和多变量Cox回归方法。结果:共纳入1404例经化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌。化疗缓解率为45.5%,ECOG 0-1为化疗缓解预后良好(OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.480 ~ 7.370, p=0.004)。心包转移(HR 1.833, 95% CI 1.102 ~ 3.215, p=0.021)、肝转移(HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.131 ~ 3.201, p=0.002)、化疗非客观缓解率(ORR) (HR 1.429, 95% CI 1.099 ~ 1.859, p=0.008)是预后较差的因素。获得二线和三线全身治疗对晚期NSCLC的生存预后有利(HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.348 ~ 0.651, p<0.001); HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.123 ~ 0.494, p<0.001)。结论:化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌有效率为45.5%。ECOG 0-1是化疗反应的独立因素。肝转移、心包转移、无后续治疗和化疗反应差是晚期NSCLC预后较差的结果。关键词:非小细胞肺癌;晚期;化疗反应因素;生存因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Factors of Chemotherapy Response and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Data from Real-World Practice with Limited Access to Novel Therapy
Background: Chemotherapy is a backbone treatment in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for non-targetable mutations and inaccessible to novel therapies. However, the data on the response rate, factors of chemotherapy response, and survival in Thailand are limited. Objective: To find the chemotherapy response rate, factors that predict chemotherapy response and survival in advanced-stage NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed by including advanced-stage NSCLC patients older than 18 years old who received chemotherapy at the medical oncology unit, Sawanpracharak Hospital between July 2014 and January 2020. Demographic data, laboratory data, details of treatment, computed tomography (CT) of chest, and survival time were collected. Descriptive statistical analyses followed by univariable and multivariable were performed to determine factors associated with chemotherapy response. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate overall survival (OS), and the log-rank test was performed to compare survival differences in each group. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression method was adopted for OS. Results: Tree hundred four chemotherapy-treated advanced-stage NSCLC were included. The chemotherapy response rate was 45.5%, and ECOG 0-1 was a favorable prognosis for chemotherapy response (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.480 to 7.370, p=0.004). Pericardial metastasis (HR 1.833, 95% CI 1.102 to 3.215, p=0.021), liver metastasis (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.131 to 3.201, p=0.002), non-objective response rate (ORR) for chemotherapy (HR 1.429, 95% CI 1.099 to 1.859, p=0.008) were worse prognosis factors. Obtaining second-line and third-line systemic treatment were favorable prognoses of survival in advanced-stage NSCLC (HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.348 to 0.651, p<0.001 and HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.123 to 0.494, p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The response rate in chemotherapy-treated advanced-stage NSCLC was 45.5%. ECOG 0-1 was an independent factor in chemotherapy response. Liver metastasis, pericardial metastasis, no subsequent treatment, and poor response to chemotherapy were worse prognosis outcomes in advanced-stage NSCLC. Keywords: NSCLC; Advanced-stage; Factor of chemotherapy response; Factor of survival
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信