心理状态模型:广场恐怖症治疗中的认知平衡2

Larry K Michelson , Robert M Schwartz , Karen E Marchione
{"title":"心理状态模型:广场恐怖症治疗中的认知平衡2","authors":"Larry K Michelson ,&nbsp;Robert M Schwartz ,&nbsp;Karen E Marchione","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(91)90008-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The states-of-mind (SOM) model, and information theoretic model of positive and negative cognitions/affects, was examined in 73 agoraphobics completing cognitive and behavioral treatments. The SOM model posits that a positive dialogue represents an optimal cognitive balance for coping with stress. The primary aims of the present study included delineating differential cognitive trajectories across treatments and assessment phases; comparing SOMs between subjects achieving low versus high endstate functioning, improvement, and tripartite concordance versus disconcordance on measures of psychophysiology, behavior and anxiety; and, studying the clinical significance of changes in SOM with the use of normative cohorts. The results corroborate prior SOM studies regarding its differential, convergent, external, and social-clinical validity. However, superior functioning was associated with higher SOMS than predicted. Methodologic, conceptual, and psychometric issues raised by some of the findings are discussed, with implications for clinical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 193-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(91)90008-X","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"States-of-mind model: Cognitive balance in the treatment of agoraphobia — II\",\"authors\":\"Larry K Michelson ,&nbsp;Robert M Schwartz ,&nbsp;Karen E Marchione\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(91)90008-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The states-of-mind (SOM) model, and information theoretic model of positive and negative cognitions/affects, was examined in 73 agoraphobics completing cognitive and behavioral treatments. The SOM model posits that a positive dialogue represents an optimal cognitive balance for coping with stress. The primary aims of the present study included delineating differential cognitive trajectories across treatments and assessment phases; comparing SOMs between subjects achieving low versus high endstate functioning, improvement, and tripartite concordance versus disconcordance on measures of psychophysiology, behavior and anxiety; and, studying the clinical significance of changes in SOM with the use of normative cohorts. The results corroborate prior SOM studies regarding its differential, convergent, external, and social-clinical validity. However, superior functioning was associated with higher SOMS than predicted. Methodologic, conceptual, and psychometric issues raised by some of the findings are discussed, with implications for clinical research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 193-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(91)90008-X\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029190008X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029190008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

本文对73例广场恐惧症患者完成认知和行为治疗后的心理状态(SOM)模型、积极和消极认知/情感的信息论模型进行了研究。SOM模型认为,积极的对话代表了应对压力的最佳认知平衡。本研究的主要目的包括描述不同治疗和评估阶段的认知轨迹;在心理生理学、行为和焦虑的测量中,比较获得低和高终端状态功能、改善和三方一致与不一致的受试者之间的SOMs;使用规范队列研究SOM变化的临床意义。结果证实了先前的SOM研究关于其差异,收敛,外部和社会临床效度。然而,优越的功能与比预期更高的SOMS相关。方法,概念和心理计量问题提出了一些研究结果进行了讨论,与临床研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
States-of-mind model: Cognitive balance in the treatment of agoraphobia — II

The states-of-mind (SOM) model, and information theoretic model of positive and negative cognitions/affects, was examined in 73 agoraphobics completing cognitive and behavioral treatments. The SOM model posits that a positive dialogue represents an optimal cognitive balance for coping with stress. The primary aims of the present study included delineating differential cognitive trajectories across treatments and assessment phases; comparing SOMs between subjects achieving low versus high endstate functioning, improvement, and tripartite concordance versus disconcordance on measures of psychophysiology, behavior and anxiety; and, studying the clinical significance of changes in SOM with the use of normative cohorts. The results corroborate prior SOM studies regarding its differential, convergent, external, and social-clinical validity. However, superior functioning was associated with higher SOMS than predicted. Methodologic, conceptual, and psychometric issues raised by some of the findings are discussed, with implications for clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信