{"title":"断层状山啡岩磁铁矿标型特征","authors":"L. Baranov, A. V. Tolstov","doi":"10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-6-66-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The paper presents new data on the material composition and formation conditions of apatite-magnetite rocks (phoscorite and camaphorites) from the Onkuchakh deposit within the Tomtor massif drawing on the study into the typomorphic features of magnetite.Aim. To study the morphology, chemical composition, and relations of magnetite with associated minerals in apatite-magnetite rocks from the Onkuchakh deposit (Tomtor massif).Materials and methods. The study employed core samples measuring 177 m in total length (borehole No. 801, Onkuchakh field, Tomtor massif). In order to determine the composition of recovered minerals, the following instruments were used: JEOL JXA-8230 Electron Probe Microanalyzer (ALROSA, Mirny, Russia); TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU field emission scanning electron microscope equipped with an Oxford Instruments INCA Energy 450+ energy dispersive spectrometer with an XMax-80 detector (ALROSA, Mirny; V. S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS). The measurements were performed according to a standard procedure: accelerating voltage — 20 kV; current — 1 nA; counting time — from 60 s; probe size — 2 μm. Instrument calibration was carried out using a set of characterized artificial compounds and natural minerals; instrument stability was confirmed by measuring Co line intensity.Results. The authors identified the textural and structural features of magnetite ores, as well as ascertaining their relations with the areas of camaphorites characterized by different material composition and host rocks. The impact of superimposed hydrothermal processes was determined. In addition, a detailed morphological characterization was provided for magnetite found to comprise two generations: primary magmatic magnetite and that transformed under the influence of superimposed processes. Finally, representative data on the chemical composition of magnetite were obtained.Conclusion. It is concluded that magnetite is formed through a magmatic process involving crystallization differentiation. The occurrence of noble metal is shown to be related to hydrothermal processes superimposed on magnetite ores. The role of apatite-magnetite ores in the formation of the supergene complex — ferrous phosphate lateritic weathering crusts of the Tomtor massif — is confirmed. It is recommended to consider camaphorites from the Tomtor massif as naturally alloyed iron ores potentially extracted along with a number of valuable components.","PeriodicalId":33343,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Typomorphic features of magnetite from tomtor massif camaphorites\",\"authors\":\"L. Baranov, A. V. Tolstov\",\"doi\":\"10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-6-66-76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The paper presents new data on the material composition and formation conditions of apatite-magnetite rocks (phoscorite and camaphorites) from the Onkuchakh deposit within the Tomtor massif drawing on the study into the typomorphic features of magnetite.Aim. To study the morphology, chemical composition, and relations of magnetite with associated minerals in apatite-magnetite rocks from the Onkuchakh deposit (Tomtor massif).Materials and methods. The study employed core samples measuring 177 m in total length (borehole No. 801, Onkuchakh field, Tomtor massif). In order to determine the composition of recovered minerals, the following instruments were used: JEOL JXA-8230 Electron Probe Microanalyzer (ALROSA, Mirny, Russia); TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU field emission scanning electron microscope equipped with an Oxford Instruments INCA Energy 450+ energy dispersive spectrometer with an XMax-80 detector (ALROSA, Mirny; V. S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS). The measurements were performed according to a standard procedure: accelerating voltage — 20 kV; current — 1 nA; counting time — from 60 s; probe size — 2 μm. Instrument calibration was carried out using a set of characterized artificial compounds and natural minerals; instrument stability was confirmed by measuring Co line intensity.Results. The authors identified the textural and structural features of magnetite ores, as well as ascertaining their relations with the areas of camaphorites characterized by different material composition and host rocks. The impact of superimposed hydrothermal processes was determined. In addition, a detailed morphological characterization was provided for magnetite found to comprise two generations: primary magmatic magnetite and that transformed under the influence of superimposed processes. Finally, representative data on the chemical composition of magnetite were obtained.Conclusion. It is concluded that magnetite is formed through a magmatic process involving crystallization differentiation. The occurrence of noble metal is shown to be related to hydrothermal processes superimposed on magnetite ores. The role of apatite-magnetite ores in the formation of the supergene complex — ferrous phosphate lateritic weathering crusts of the Tomtor massif — is confirmed. It is recommended to consider camaphorites from the Tomtor massif as naturally alloyed iron ores potentially extracted along with a number of valuable components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-6-66-76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-6-66-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。本文通过对磁铁矿标型特征的研究,介绍了托托尔地块Onkuchakh矿床磷灰石-磁铁矿(磷灰石和灯辉石)的物质组成和形成条件的新资料。研究Onkuchakh矿床(Tomtor地块)磷灰石-磁铁矿岩石中磁铁矿的形态、化学组成及其与伴生矿物的关系。材料和方法。该研究采用了总长度为177 m的岩心样品(Tomtor地块Onkuchakh油田801号井)。为了确定回收矿物的组成,使用了以下仪器:JEOL JXA-8230电子探针微量分析仪(ALROSA, Mirny,俄罗斯);TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU场发射扫描电子显微镜,配备牛津仪器INCA Energy 450+能量色散光谱仪和XMax-80探测器(ALROSA, Mirny;俄罗斯科学院索博列夫地质矿物学研究所。测量按标准程序进行:加速电压- 20kv;电流- 1na;计数时间-从60秒;探头尺寸- 2 μm。使用一组表征的人工化合物和天然矿物质进行仪器校准;通过测量Co线强度,证实了仪器的稳定性。确定了磁铁矿的结构和构造特征,并确定了它们与具有不同物质组成和寄主岩石特征的camaphorites区域的关系。确定了叠合热液过程的影响。此外,对发现的两代磁铁矿进行了详细的形态表征:原生岩浆磁铁矿和在叠加作用影响下转变的磁铁矿。最后,获得了具有代表性的磁铁矿化学成分数据。认为磁铁矿的形成是一个岩浆过程,岩浆过程中存在结晶分异。贵金属的赋存与磁铁矿上叠加的热液作用有关。证实了磷灰石-磁铁矿在托托地块表生杂岩-磷酸亚铁红土风化壳形成中的作用。建议将托托地块中的camaphorites视为可能与许多有价值的成分一起提取的天然合金铁矿石。
Typomorphic features of magnetite from tomtor massif camaphorites
Background. The paper presents new data on the material composition and formation conditions of apatite-magnetite rocks (phoscorite and camaphorites) from the Onkuchakh deposit within the Tomtor massif drawing on the study into the typomorphic features of magnetite.Aim. To study the morphology, chemical composition, and relations of magnetite with associated minerals in apatite-magnetite rocks from the Onkuchakh deposit (Tomtor massif).Materials and methods. The study employed core samples measuring 177 m in total length (borehole No. 801, Onkuchakh field, Tomtor massif). In order to determine the composition of recovered minerals, the following instruments were used: JEOL JXA-8230 Electron Probe Microanalyzer (ALROSA, Mirny, Russia); TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU field emission scanning electron microscope equipped with an Oxford Instruments INCA Energy 450+ energy dispersive spectrometer with an XMax-80 detector (ALROSA, Mirny; V. S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS). The measurements were performed according to a standard procedure: accelerating voltage — 20 kV; current — 1 nA; counting time — from 60 s; probe size — 2 μm. Instrument calibration was carried out using a set of characterized artificial compounds and natural minerals; instrument stability was confirmed by measuring Co line intensity.Results. The authors identified the textural and structural features of magnetite ores, as well as ascertaining their relations with the areas of camaphorites characterized by different material composition and host rocks. The impact of superimposed hydrothermal processes was determined. In addition, a detailed morphological characterization was provided for magnetite found to comprise two generations: primary magmatic magnetite and that transformed under the influence of superimposed processes. Finally, representative data on the chemical composition of magnetite were obtained.Conclusion. It is concluded that magnetite is formed through a magmatic process involving crystallization differentiation. The occurrence of noble metal is shown to be related to hydrothermal processes superimposed on magnetite ores. The role of apatite-magnetite ores in the formation of the supergene complex — ferrous phosphate lateritic weathering crusts of the Tomtor massif — is confirmed. It is recommended to consider camaphorites from the Tomtor massif as naturally alloyed iron ores potentially extracted along with a number of valuable components.