利用肌电图和运动捕捉分析开放性和机器人根治性膀胱切除术中外科医生的生物特征

A. Baumgarten, J. Kim, J. Robison, J. Mayer, Dustin D. Hardwick, T. Patel
{"title":"利用肌电图和运动捕捉分析开放性和机器人根治性膀胱切除术中外科医生的生物特征","authors":"A. Baumgarten, J. Kim, J. Robison, J. Mayer, Dustin D. Hardwick, T. Patel","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: To determine feasibility of measuring surgeon physical stress during both open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robotic radical cystectomy (RRC). Materials and Methods: One patient underwent ORC, while the other underwent RRC by a single surgeon. The diversion was excluded from this study. Noraxon® myoMOTION™ kinematics sensors were used to quantify the amount of joint and segmental motion of the spine, shoulders, and head. myoMUSCLE™ EMG sensors were used to measure activation levels, patterns, and fatigue characteristics of key muscle groups. The Prone Static Plank Test (PSPT) and Modified Biering-Sorensen Test (MBST) were used to assess surgeon strength and endurance of core musculature. Results: The surgeries were represented in five stages. During ORC, the percentage of time spent in cervical flexion was 98%, 91.8%, 87.5%, 100%, and 97.1%, respectively. During RRC, 100% of the time was spent in cervical flexion. Activation of key muscle groups was examined across all stages and expressed as a percentage of peak activation. MBST times were both 25 second pre-and post-surgery ORC and 25.1 seconds pre-surgery and 32.4 seconds post-surgery for RRC. PSPT times were 68 second pre-surgery and 48 seconds post-surgery for ORC, and 59 second pre-surgery and 51 seconds post-surgery for RRC. Conclusion: We were able to identify meaningful data using kinematic and EMG analysis during ORC and RRC. We were able to identify target muscle groups that will be used to conduct a larger study with multiple surgeons to help determine if there is an ergonomic advantage to RRC over traditional ORC.","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"46 1 1","pages":"138 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of surgeon biometrics during open and robotic radical cystectomy with electromyography and motion capture analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Baumgarten, J. Kim, J. Robison, J. Mayer, Dustin D. Hardwick, T. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose: To determine feasibility of measuring surgeon physical stress during both open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robotic radical cystectomy (RRC). Materials and Methods: One patient underwent ORC, while the other underwent RRC by a single surgeon. The diversion was excluded from this study. Noraxon® myoMOTION™ kinematics sensors were used to quantify the amount of joint and segmental motion of the spine, shoulders, and head. myoMUSCLE™ EMG sensors were used to measure activation levels, patterns, and fatigue characteristics of key muscle groups. The Prone Static Plank Test (PSPT) and Modified Biering-Sorensen Test (MBST) were used to assess surgeon strength and endurance of core musculature. Results: The surgeries were represented in five stages. During ORC, the percentage of time spent in cervical flexion was 98%, 91.8%, 87.5%, 100%, and 97.1%, respectively. During RRC, 100% of the time was spent in cervical flexion. Activation of key muscle groups was examined across all stages and expressed as a percentage of peak activation. MBST times were both 25 second pre-and post-surgery ORC and 25.1 seconds pre-surgery and 32.4 seconds post-surgery for RRC. PSPT times were 68 second pre-surgery and 48 seconds post-surgery for ORC, and 59 second pre-surgery and 51 seconds post-surgery for RRC. Conclusion: We were able to identify meaningful data using kinematic and EMG analysis during ORC and RRC. We were able to identify target muscle groups that will be used to conduct a larger study with multiple surgeons to help determine if there is an ergonomic advantage to RRC over traditional ORC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"volume\":\"46 1 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨在开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)和机器人根治性膀胱切除术(RRC)中测量外科医生身体压力的可行性。材料与方法:1例患者行ORC,另1例患者行RRC。本研究排除分流。Noraxon®myoMOTION™运动学传感器用于量化脊柱、肩部和头部的关节和节段运动量。myoMUSCLE™肌电传感器用于测量关键肌肉群的激活水平、模式和疲劳特征。俯卧静态平板支撑试验(PSPT)和改良Biering-Sorensen试验(MBST)用于评估外科医生核心肌肉组织的力量和耐力。结果:手术分为5个阶段。在ORC期间,颈椎屈曲所占的时间比例分别为98%、91.8%、87.5%、100%和97.1%。在RRC期间,100%的时间用于颈椎屈曲。在所有阶段检查关键肌肉群的激活,并以峰值激活的百分比表示。ORC术前、术后MBST时间均为25秒,RRC术前、术后MBST时间均为25.1秒、32.4秒。ORC的PSPT时间为术前68秒、术后48秒,RRC为术前59秒、术后51秒。结论:我们能够在ORC和RRC期间通过运动学和肌电分析识别有意义的数据。我们能够确定目标肌肉群,这些肌肉群将用于与多名外科医生进行更大规模的研究,以帮助确定RRC是否比传统ORC具有人体工程学优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of surgeon biometrics during open and robotic radical cystectomy with electromyography and motion capture analysis
ABSTRACT Purpose: To determine feasibility of measuring surgeon physical stress during both open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robotic radical cystectomy (RRC). Materials and Methods: One patient underwent ORC, while the other underwent RRC by a single surgeon. The diversion was excluded from this study. Noraxon® myoMOTION™ kinematics sensors were used to quantify the amount of joint and segmental motion of the spine, shoulders, and head. myoMUSCLE™ EMG sensors were used to measure activation levels, patterns, and fatigue characteristics of key muscle groups. The Prone Static Plank Test (PSPT) and Modified Biering-Sorensen Test (MBST) were used to assess surgeon strength and endurance of core musculature. Results: The surgeries were represented in five stages. During ORC, the percentage of time spent in cervical flexion was 98%, 91.8%, 87.5%, 100%, and 97.1%, respectively. During RRC, 100% of the time was spent in cervical flexion. Activation of key muscle groups was examined across all stages and expressed as a percentage of peak activation. MBST times were both 25 second pre-and post-surgery ORC and 25.1 seconds pre-surgery and 32.4 seconds post-surgery for RRC. PSPT times were 68 second pre-surgery and 48 seconds post-surgery for ORC, and 59 second pre-surgery and 51 seconds post-surgery for RRC. Conclusion: We were able to identify meaningful data using kinematic and EMG analysis during ORC and RRC. We were able to identify target muscle groups that will be used to conduct a larger study with multiple surgeons to help determine if there is an ergonomic advantage to RRC over traditional ORC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信