富血小板血浆敷料治疗慢性不愈合溃疡的疗效:15项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Yijun Xia, Jun Zhao, Juan Xie, Yang Lv, Dongsheng Cao
{"title":"富血小板血浆敷料治疗慢性不愈合溃疡的疗效:15项随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Yijun Xia, Jun Zhao, Juan Xie, Yang Lv, Dongsheng Cao","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nSeveral randomized controlled trials comparing platelet-rich plasma to standard wound care for chronic wounds have been published. Previous articles have revealed that the role of platelet-rich plasma in promoting chronic wound healing is uncertain. This quantitative meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether superior outcomes can be obtained by using platelet-rich plasma in nonhealing ulcers compared with traditional wound care.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane databases were searched through November of 2018 for randomized controlled trials comparing platelet-rich plasma to standard wound care for chronic wounds. For binary outcome measures, we calculated the risk ratio. The continuous outcomes were expressed as the mean differences. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the type of chronic ulcer.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 630 adult patients in 15 randomized controlled trials from 2000 to 2018 were included. The number of ulcers healed in the platelet-rich plasma group was higher than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (risk ratio, 1.26; 95 percent CI, 1.11 to 1.42; p = 0.0003). During the fourth week of follow-up, the number of ulcers healed in the platelet-rich plasma group was significantly greater than in the control group (risk ratio, 3.50; 95 percent CI, 1.80 to 6.81; p = 0.0002).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPlatelet-rich plasma is a valuable and safe treatment dressing for chronic nonhealing ulcers; it is simple to prepare and has remarkable effects. Further high-quality prospective studies are necessary to validate these results.\n\n\nCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nTherapeutic, II.","PeriodicalId":20168,"journal":{"name":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Dressing for Chronic Nonhealing Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yijun Xia, Jun Zhao, Juan Xie, Yang Lv, Dongsheng Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nSeveral randomized controlled trials comparing platelet-rich plasma to standard wound care for chronic wounds have been published. Previous articles have revealed that the role of platelet-rich plasma in promoting chronic wound healing is uncertain. This quantitative meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether superior outcomes can be obtained by using platelet-rich plasma in nonhealing ulcers compared with traditional wound care.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane databases were searched through November of 2018 for randomized controlled trials comparing platelet-rich plasma to standard wound care for chronic wounds. For binary outcome measures, we calculated the risk ratio. The continuous outcomes were expressed as the mean differences. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the type of chronic ulcer.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOverall, 630 adult patients in 15 randomized controlled trials from 2000 to 2018 were included. The number of ulcers healed in the platelet-rich plasma group was higher than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (risk ratio, 1.26; 95 percent CI, 1.11 to 1.42; p = 0.0003). During the fourth week of follow-up, the number of ulcers healed in the platelet-rich plasma group was significantly greater than in the control group (risk ratio, 3.50; 95 percent CI, 1.80 to 6.81; p = 0.0002).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nPlatelet-rich plasma is a valuable and safe treatment dressing for chronic nonhealing ulcers; it is simple to prepare and has remarkable effects. Further high-quality prospective studies are necessary to validate these results.\\n\\n\\nCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\nTherapeutic, II.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:一些比较富血小板血浆和标准伤口护理治疗慢性伤口的随机对照试验已经发表。以前的文章表明,富血小板血浆在促进慢性伤口愈合中的作用是不确定的。本定量荟萃分析旨在评估与传统伤口护理相比,富血小板血浆治疗未愈合溃疡是否能获得更好的结果。方法检索截至2018年11月的PubMed、EMBASE、EBSCO(护理和相关健康文献累积索引)和Cochrane数据库,比较富血小板血浆与标准伤口护理对慢性伤口的随机对照试验。对于二元结果测量,我们计算了风险比。连续结果表示为平均差异。根据慢性溃疡类型进行亚组分析。结果共纳入2000 - 2018年15项随机对照试验的630例成人患者。富血小板血浆组溃疡愈合数高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(危险比,1.26;95% CI, 1.11 ~ 1.42;P = 0.0003)。随访第四周,富血小板血浆组溃疡愈合数显著高于对照组(风险比3.50;95% CI, 1.80 ~ 6.81;P = 0.0002)。结论富血小板血浆是一种有价值且安全的治疗慢性不愈合溃疡敷料;该制剂制备简单,效果显著。需要进一步的高质量前瞻性研究来验证这些结果。临床问题/证据治疗水平2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Dressing for Chronic Nonhealing Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Controlled Trials.
BACKGROUND Several randomized controlled trials comparing platelet-rich plasma to standard wound care for chronic wounds have been published. Previous articles have revealed that the role of platelet-rich plasma in promoting chronic wound healing is uncertain. This quantitative meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether superior outcomes can be obtained by using platelet-rich plasma in nonhealing ulcers compared with traditional wound care. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane databases were searched through November of 2018 for randomized controlled trials comparing platelet-rich plasma to standard wound care for chronic wounds. For binary outcome measures, we calculated the risk ratio. The continuous outcomes were expressed as the mean differences. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the type of chronic ulcer. RESULTS Overall, 630 adult patients in 15 randomized controlled trials from 2000 to 2018 were included. The number of ulcers healed in the platelet-rich plasma group was higher than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (risk ratio, 1.26; 95 percent CI, 1.11 to 1.42; p = 0.0003). During the fourth week of follow-up, the number of ulcers healed in the platelet-rich plasma group was significantly greater than in the control group (risk ratio, 3.50; 95 percent CI, 1.80 to 6.81; p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS Platelet-rich plasma is a valuable and safe treatment dressing for chronic nonhealing ulcers; it is simple to prepare and has remarkable effects. Further high-quality prospective studies are necessary to validate these results. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, II.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信