ROBERT VON MELUN和阿伯拉德伦理谱在12世纪再加上罗伯特·冯·梅伦,阿森嫩蒂,I, II

IF 0.3 2区 哲学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Matthias Perkams
{"title":"ROBERT VON MELUN和阿伯拉德伦理谱在12世纪再加上罗伯特·冯·梅伦,阿森嫩蒂,I, II","authors":"Matthias Perkams","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.75.1.2030801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues against the view that Peter Abelard's ethical theory had no lasting influence in its time. It establishes that Abelard's Parisian successor Robert of Melun adopted his views and elaborated upon them. According to Robert, in his day it was commonly assumed that sin is action against one's own conscience. Like Abelard, he held that intention alone makes the difference between good and bad actions. Robert had, however, a more elaborate theory of the will than did Abelard, and Robert discussed the relationship between the will and intention. Robert's most relevant texts on these topics are edited on the basis of all available manuscripts, and their textual relationship is discussed.","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"1 1","pages":"33-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROBERT VON MELUN UND DIE REZEPTION DER ABAELARDISCHEN ETHIK IM 12. JAHRHUNDERT : Nebst einer kritischen Edition von Robert von Melun, Sententiae, I, II, [0], 164-171 und I, I, 8, 79-84\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Perkams\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/RTPM.75.1.2030801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article argues against the view that Peter Abelard's ethical theory had no lasting influence in its time. It establishes that Abelard's Parisian successor Robert of Melun adopted his views and elaborated upon them. According to Robert, in his day it was commonly assumed that sin is action against one's own conscience. Like Abelard, he held that intention alone makes the difference between good and bad actions. Robert had, however, a more elaborate theory of the will than did Abelard, and Robert discussed the relationship between the will and intention. Robert's most relevant texts on these topics are edited on the basis of all available manuscripts, and their textual relationship is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"33-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.75.1.2030801\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.75.1.2030801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文反驳了彼得·阿伯拉尔的伦理理论在当时没有持久影响的观点。它确立了阿伯拉尔的巴黎继任者梅伦的罗伯特采纳了他的观点并对其进行了阐述。根据罗伯特的说法,在他那个时代,人们普遍认为罪是违背自己良心的行为。像阿伯拉尔一样,他认为只有意图才能决定好与坏的行为。然而,罗伯特对意志的理论比阿伯拉尔更详尽,他讨论了意志和意图之间的关系。罗伯特关于这些主题的最相关的文本是在所有可用手稿的基础上编辑的,并且讨论了它们的文本关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ROBERT VON MELUN UND DIE REZEPTION DER ABAELARDISCHEN ETHIK IM 12. JAHRHUNDERT : Nebst einer kritischen Edition von Robert von Melun, Sententiae, I, II, [0], 164-171 und I, I, 8, 79-84
The article argues against the view that Peter Abelard's ethical theory had no lasting influence in its time. It establishes that Abelard's Parisian successor Robert of Melun adopted his views and elaborated upon them. According to Robert, in his day it was commonly assumed that sin is action against one's own conscience. Like Abelard, he held that intention alone makes the difference between good and bad actions. Robert had, however, a more elaborate theory of the will than did Abelard, and Robert discussed the relationship between the will and intention. Robert's most relevant texts on these topics are edited on the basis of all available manuscripts, and their textual relationship is discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales / Forschungen zur Theologie und Philosophie des Mittelalters (formerly Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale of the Abbaye Mont César) provides a forum for original, high-quality research on all aspects of theology and philosophy from Augustine and the Early Middle Ages up to late scholasticism. Recent articles have included highly focused studies on particular facets of the medieval philosophical or theological tradition, broader reconsiderations of received views in the history of medieval theology and philosophy, and editions of texts and manuscript studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信