SapiPin: pin码输入动态观察

IF 0.3 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
M. Antal, Krisztián Búza
{"title":"SapiPin: pin码输入动态观察","authors":"M. Antal, Krisztián Búza","doi":"10.2478/ausi-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we report on PIN-code typing behaviour on touchscreen devices of 112 subjects. Detailed statistical analysis revealed that the major di erence between subjects is in inter-key latency. Key-press duration variations are insignificant compared to inter-key latency variations. Subjects were grouped into meaningful clusters using clustering. The resulting clusters were of slow, medium, and fast typists. The dataset was split randomly into two equal size subsets. The first subset was used to train different synthetic data generators, while the second subset was used to evaluate an authentication attack using the generated synthetic data. The evaluation showed that slow typists were the hardest to attack. Both the dataset and the software are publicly available at https://github.com/margitantal68/sapipin_paper.","PeriodicalId":41480,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica","volume":"25 1","pages":"10 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SapiPin: Observations on PIN-code typing dynamics\",\"authors\":\"M. Antal, Krisztián Búza\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ausi-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper, we report on PIN-code typing behaviour on touchscreen devices of 112 subjects. Detailed statistical analysis revealed that the major di erence between subjects is in inter-key latency. Key-press duration variations are insignificant compared to inter-key latency variations. Subjects were grouped into meaningful clusters using clustering. The resulting clusters were of slow, medium, and fast typists. The dataset was split randomly into two equal size subsets. The first subset was used to train different synthetic data generators, while the second subset was used to evaluate an authentication attack using the generated synthetic data. The evaluation showed that slow typists were the hardest to attack. Both the dataset and the software are publicly available at https://github.com/margitantal68/sapipin_paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"10 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausi-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausi-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文报道了112名被试在触屏设备上的pin码输入行为。详细的统计分析表明,受试者之间的主要差异在于键间延迟。与键间延迟变化相比,按键持续时间的变化是微不足道的。采用聚类法将研究对象分为有意义的聚类。结果是打字速度慢、中、快的人。数据集被随机分成两个大小相等的子集。第一个子集用于训练不同的合成数据生成器,而第二个子集用于使用生成的合成数据评估身份验证攻击。评估结果显示,打字慢的人最难对付。数据集和软件都可以在https://github.com/margitantal68/sapipin_paper上公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SapiPin: Observations on PIN-code typing dynamics
Abstract In this paper, we report on PIN-code typing behaviour on touchscreen devices of 112 subjects. Detailed statistical analysis revealed that the major di erence between subjects is in inter-key latency. Key-press duration variations are insignificant compared to inter-key latency variations. Subjects were grouped into meaningful clusters using clustering. The resulting clusters were of slow, medium, and fast typists. The dataset was split randomly into two equal size subsets. The first subset was used to train different synthetic data generators, while the second subset was used to evaluate an authentication attack using the generated synthetic data. The evaluation showed that slow typists were the hardest to attack. Both the dataset and the software are publicly available at https://github.com/margitantal68/sapipin_paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信