不同异种移植颗粒大小的鼻窦增强骨形成:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Bruna Genari, Romulo Cantarelli, Antonio da Silva RAMOS NETO, E. B. E. Silva, F. Degrazia
{"title":"不同异种移植颗粒大小的鼻窦增强骨形成:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Bruna Genari, Romulo Cantarelli, Antonio da Silva RAMOS NETO, E. B. E. Silva, F. Degrazia","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The commercial bovine bone mineral most commonly used is available in two particle sizes and studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding bone formation volume using small or large particles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume in sinus floor augmentation using small and large particles. The following outcome measures were assessed: bone formation volume (%) and residual bovine bone particles volume (%) assessed by histomorphometric analysis. The initial screening resulted in 236 records. After removal of duplicated articles and analysis of titles, abstracts and full texts, three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume did not differ between small and large particles, with low heterogeneity of studies. The particle size of bovine bone mineral did not influence bone formation percentage; small and large particles of bovine bone graft presented similar residual bone mineral; more randomized clinical trials should be performed to completely confirm that bovine bone mineral particle size does not affect the result of sinus floor augmentation.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone formation in sinus augmentation with different xenograft particle sizes: systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Genari, Romulo Cantarelli, Antonio da Silva RAMOS NETO, E. B. E. Silva, F. Degrazia\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The commercial bovine bone mineral most commonly used is available in two particle sizes and studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding bone formation volume using small or large particles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume in sinus floor augmentation using small and large particles. The following outcome measures were assessed: bone formation volume (%) and residual bovine bone particles volume (%) assessed by histomorphometric analysis. The initial screening resulted in 236 records. After removal of duplicated articles and analysis of titles, abstracts and full texts, three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume did not differ between small and large particles, with low heterogeneity of studies. The particle size of bovine bone mineral did not influence bone formation percentage; small and large particles of bovine bone graft presented similar residual bone mineral; more randomized clinical trials should be performed to completely confirm that bovine bone mineral particle size does not affect the result of sinus floor augmentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最常用的商业牛骨矿物有两种粒径,研究表明,关于使用小颗粒或大颗粒的骨形成体积,结果相互矛盾。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是比较小颗粒和大颗粒窦底增强术中骨形成体积和残余牛骨体积。评估以下结果指标:通过组织形态学分析评估骨形成体积(%)和残留牛骨颗粒体积(%)。最初的筛选产生了236条记录。在删除重复文章并对标题、摘要和全文进行分析后,三篇文章被纳入meta分析。骨形成体积和残余牛骨体积在大小颗粒之间没有差异,研究的异质性较低。牛骨矿物颗粒大小对骨形成率没有影响;牛骨移植小颗粒和大颗粒的骨矿物质残留相似;应该进行更多的随机临床试验,以完全证实牛骨矿物颗粒大小不影响窦底增强的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bone formation in sinus augmentation with different xenograft particle sizes: systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT The commercial bovine bone mineral most commonly used is available in two particle sizes and studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding bone formation volume using small or large particles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume in sinus floor augmentation using small and large particles. The following outcome measures were assessed: bone formation volume (%) and residual bovine bone particles volume (%) assessed by histomorphometric analysis. The initial screening resulted in 236 records. After removal of duplicated articles and analysis of titles, abstracts and full texts, three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume did not differ between small and large particles, with low heterogeneity of studies. The particle size of bovine bone mineral did not influence bone formation percentage; small and large particles of bovine bone graft presented similar residual bone mineral; more randomized clinical trials should be performed to completely confirm that bovine bone mineral particle size does not affect the result of sinus floor augmentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信