剖宫产术后镇痛药管理指南:认知调查

Storti Eleonora, V. Silvia, B. Raffaele, Ricchi Alba, B. Jessica, Neri Isabella
{"title":"剖宫产术后镇痛药管理指南:认知调查","authors":"Storti Eleonora, V. Silvia, B. Raffaele, Ricchi Alba, B. Jessica, Neri Isabella","doi":"10.23937/2474-1353/1510075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify the most effective analgesic plan to minimise the perception of pain of the woman subjected to caesarean section. Material and methods: Experimental Case-control study. The 76 women of the “case” received timed multimodal therapy. In addition, the same sample received a satisfaction questionnaire with items concerning the psycho-physical wellbeing of women in relation to the treatment plan being used. The “control” group, also made up of 76 women who had recently given birth, was subjected to the unimodal analgesic plan as required. Mothers’ pain of both groups was registered every day of hospitalisation by the same parameter: “VAS”. Results: The p-value is not statistically significant on day 0, on day 2 and on day 3. This means that the two analgesic treatments can be overlapped in order to obtain the pre-established outcome. However, the only statistically significant datum is the VAS measured on day I. Therefore, a timed therapeutic approach was found to be more effective in the management of post-operative pain on day 1 as regards the need for analgesic. Conclusions: From what emerged from the study, adequate pain control is needed mostly in the 24 hours following the operation: in this phase, the woman who has just delivered a child reports a higher level of pain, presumably due to increased mobilisation and partial recovery of the physiological functions. However, the two treatment models are effective in the reduction of post-operative pain, although both treatments do not seem to be sufficient to achieve the prefixed outcome in the first day of hospitalisation. Summary: Good pain control in women after childbirth improves the psycho-physical wellbeing of the mother-child dyad and reduces the possibility of chronic pain and post-partum depression.","PeriodicalId":92223,"journal":{"name":"International journal of women's health and wellness","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for Management of Analgesics after Caesarean Section: Cognitive Survey\",\"authors\":\"Storti Eleonora, V. Silvia, B. Raffaele, Ricchi Alba, B. Jessica, Neri Isabella\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2474-1353/1510075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To identify the most effective analgesic plan to minimise the perception of pain of the woman subjected to caesarean section. Material and methods: Experimental Case-control study. The 76 women of the “case” received timed multimodal therapy. In addition, the same sample received a satisfaction questionnaire with items concerning the psycho-physical wellbeing of women in relation to the treatment plan being used. The “control” group, also made up of 76 women who had recently given birth, was subjected to the unimodal analgesic plan as required. Mothers’ pain of both groups was registered every day of hospitalisation by the same parameter: “VAS”. Results: The p-value is not statistically significant on day 0, on day 2 and on day 3. This means that the two analgesic treatments can be overlapped in order to obtain the pre-established outcome. However, the only statistically significant datum is the VAS measured on day I. Therefore, a timed therapeutic approach was found to be more effective in the management of post-operative pain on day 1 as regards the need for analgesic. Conclusions: From what emerged from the study, adequate pain control is needed mostly in the 24 hours following the operation: in this phase, the woman who has just delivered a child reports a higher level of pain, presumably due to increased mobilisation and partial recovery of the physiological functions. However, the two treatment models are effective in the reduction of post-operative pain, although both treatments do not seem to be sufficient to achieve the prefixed outcome in the first day of hospitalisation. Summary: Good pain control in women after childbirth improves the psycho-physical wellbeing of the mother-child dyad and reduces the possibility of chronic pain and post-partum depression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of women's health and wellness\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of women's health and wellness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of women's health and wellness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-1353/1510075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:确定最有效的镇痛方案,以尽量减少疼痛的妇女遭受剖腹产。材料与方法:实验病例对照研究。“病例”中的76名妇女接受了定时多模式治疗。此外,同样的样本还收到了一份满意度问卷,内容涉及与所使用的治疗计划有关的妇女心理和生理健康。“控制”组,也由76名最近分娩的妇女组成,按要求接受单峰镇痛计划。两组母亲在住院期间每天的疼痛以相同的参数“VAS”进行记录。结果:p值在第0天、第2天、第3天均无统计学意义。这意味着两种镇痛治疗可以重叠,以获得预先确定的结果。然而,唯一具有统计学意义的数据是第1天测量的VAS。因此,就镇痛药物的需要而言,发现定时治疗方法在第1天的术后疼痛管理中更有效。结论:从研究中得出的结论来看,在手术后的24小时内最需要适当的疼痛控制:在这个阶段,刚刚分娩的妇女报告的疼痛程度更高,可能是由于活动能力的增加和生理功能的部分恢复。然而,这两种治疗模式在减少术后疼痛方面是有效的,尽管这两种治疗似乎不足以在住院第一天达到预定的结果。摘要:分娩后良好的疼痛控制可以改善母子二人的身心健康,减少慢性疼痛和产后抑郁的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for Management of Analgesics after Caesarean Section: Cognitive Survey
Objective: To identify the most effective analgesic plan to minimise the perception of pain of the woman subjected to caesarean section. Material and methods: Experimental Case-control study. The 76 women of the “case” received timed multimodal therapy. In addition, the same sample received a satisfaction questionnaire with items concerning the psycho-physical wellbeing of women in relation to the treatment plan being used. The “control” group, also made up of 76 women who had recently given birth, was subjected to the unimodal analgesic plan as required. Mothers’ pain of both groups was registered every day of hospitalisation by the same parameter: “VAS”. Results: The p-value is not statistically significant on day 0, on day 2 and on day 3. This means that the two analgesic treatments can be overlapped in order to obtain the pre-established outcome. However, the only statistically significant datum is the VAS measured on day I. Therefore, a timed therapeutic approach was found to be more effective in the management of post-operative pain on day 1 as regards the need for analgesic. Conclusions: From what emerged from the study, adequate pain control is needed mostly in the 24 hours following the operation: in this phase, the woman who has just delivered a child reports a higher level of pain, presumably due to increased mobilisation and partial recovery of the physiological functions. However, the two treatment models are effective in the reduction of post-operative pain, although both treatments do not seem to be sufficient to achieve the prefixed outcome in the first day of hospitalisation. Summary: Good pain control in women after childbirth improves the psycho-physical wellbeing of the mother-child dyad and reduces the possibility of chronic pain and post-partum depression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信