基于两个工业案例研究的安全风险模型验证和修正测试的有效性评估

Gencer Erdogan, Fredrik Seehusen, K. Stølen, Jon Hofstad, J. Aagedal
{"title":"基于两个工业案例研究的安全风险模型验证和修正测试的有效性评估","authors":"Gencer Erdogan, Fredrik Seehusen, K. Stølen, Jon Hofstad, J. Aagedal","doi":"10.4018/IJSSE.2015040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present the results of an evaluation in which the objective was to assess how useful testing is for validating and correcting security risk models. The evaluation is based on two industrial case studies. In the first case study the authors analyzed a multilingual financial Web application, while in the second case study they analyzed a mobile financial application. In both case studies, the testing yielded new information which was not found in the risk assessment phase. In particular, in the first case study, new vulnerabilities were found which resulted in an update of the likelihood values of threat scenarios and risks in the risk model. New vulnerabilities were also identified and added to the risk model in the second case study. These updates led to more accurate risk models, which indicate that the testing was indeed useful for validating and correcting the risk models.","PeriodicalId":89158,"journal":{"name":"International journal of secure software engineering","volume":"41 1","pages":"90-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Usefulness of Testing for Validating and Correcting Security Risk Models Based on Two Industrial Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"Gencer Erdogan, Fredrik Seehusen, K. Stølen, Jon Hofstad, J. Aagedal\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJSSE.2015040105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors present the results of an evaluation in which the objective was to assess how useful testing is for validating and correcting security risk models. The evaluation is based on two industrial case studies. In the first case study the authors analyzed a multilingual financial Web application, while in the second case study they analyzed a mobile financial application. In both case studies, the testing yielded new information which was not found in the risk assessment phase. In particular, in the first case study, new vulnerabilities were found which resulted in an update of the likelihood values of threat scenarios and risks in the risk model. New vulnerabilities were also identified and added to the risk model in the second case study. These updates led to more accurate risk models, which indicate that the testing was indeed useful for validating and correcting the risk models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of secure software engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"90-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of secure software engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSE.2015040105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of secure software engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSE.2015040105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

作者展示了一个评估的结果,其中的目标是评估测试对于验证和纠正安全风险模型有多有用。该评价基于两个工业案例研究。在第一个案例研究中,作者分析了一个多语言金融Web应用程序,而在第二个案例研究中,他们分析了一个移动金融应用程序。在这两个案例研究中,测试产生了在风险评估阶段没有发现的新信息。特别是,在第一个案例研究中,发现了新的漏洞,从而更新了风险模型中威胁场景和风险的可能性值。在第二个案例研究中,还发现了新的漏洞并将其添加到风险模型中。这些更新导致了更准确的风险模型,这表明测试对于验证和纠正风险模型确实很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Usefulness of Testing for Validating and Correcting Security Risk Models Based on Two Industrial Case Studies
The authors present the results of an evaluation in which the objective was to assess how useful testing is for validating and correcting security risk models. The evaluation is based on two industrial case studies. In the first case study the authors analyzed a multilingual financial Web application, while in the second case study they analyzed a mobile financial application. In both case studies, the testing yielded new information which was not found in the risk assessment phase. In particular, in the first case study, new vulnerabilities were found which resulted in an update of the likelihood values of threat scenarios and risks in the risk model. New vulnerabilities were also identified and added to the risk model in the second case study. These updates led to more accurate risk models, which indicate that the testing was indeed useful for validating and correcting the risk models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信