来自创始编辑:十年后的超常思考

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Richard Raiswell, Kirsten C. Uszkalo
{"title":"来自创始编辑:十年后的超常思考","authors":"Richard Raiswell, Kirsten C. Uszkalo","doi":"10.5325/preternature.10.2.0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"preternature, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021 Copyright © 2021 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa. In his 1605 Advancement of Learning, Francis Bacon advocated for a program that investigated “nature erring, or varying” as part of his general history of nature, its properties and limits. This “history of marvels,” as he went on to explain, would be distinct from that of the “history of creatures,” and the “history of arts,” in that it would center upon nature’s digressions. That is to say, it would be concerned with those instances in which nature diverged in its operation from its usual course to produce strange effects. While he could find “a number of books of fabulous Experiments, & Secrets, and frivolous Impostures for pleasure and strangenesse,” he lamented, he could not find “a substantiall and severe Collection of HETEROCLITES, or IRREGULARS of NATURE, well examined & described” (Bacon 1605: sig. Bb4r). Yet such instances were important, he thought, for they might betray hitherto strange but wholly natural effects that might be harnessed to improve human welfare. Our goal when we founded Preternature was to take up Bacon’s challenge once more, albeit a tad belatedly and to different ends. We fixed on the journal’s title, for it nicely delineated that sliver of space between the natural and the supernatural haunted by the creatures of perception and imagination, whose existence defies mere rationalistic explanation. Preternature, as we originally conceived of the journal, was to be the home for the study of the preternatural— but the preternatural as the preternatural. It was to be a rigorous textual space for the study of this epistemological space. To be sure, the last generation has seen a burgeoning of scholarship on the likes of aliens, demons, revenants, monsters, ghosts and spirits, and on magic and occultism, too. But while these studies have been fascinating in themselves from the founding editors: thinking preternaturally after ten years","PeriodicalId":41216,"journal":{"name":"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural","volume":"26 1","pages":"159 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Founding Editors: Thinking Preternaturally After Ten Years\",\"authors\":\"Richard Raiswell, Kirsten C. Uszkalo\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/preternature.10.2.0159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"preternature, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021 Copyright © 2021 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa. In his 1605 Advancement of Learning, Francis Bacon advocated for a program that investigated “nature erring, or varying” as part of his general history of nature, its properties and limits. This “history of marvels,” as he went on to explain, would be distinct from that of the “history of creatures,” and the “history of arts,” in that it would center upon nature’s digressions. That is to say, it would be concerned with those instances in which nature diverged in its operation from its usual course to produce strange effects. While he could find “a number of books of fabulous Experiments, & Secrets, and frivolous Impostures for pleasure and strangenesse,” he lamented, he could not find “a substantiall and severe Collection of HETEROCLITES, or IRREGULARS of NATURE, well examined & described” (Bacon 1605: sig. Bb4r). Yet such instances were important, he thought, for they might betray hitherto strange but wholly natural effects that might be harnessed to improve human welfare. Our goal when we founded Preternature was to take up Bacon’s challenge once more, albeit a tad belatedly and to different ends. We fixed on the journal’s title, for it nicely delineated that sliver of space between the natural and the supernatural haunted by the creatures of perception and imagination, whose existence defies mere rationalistic explanation. Preternature, as we originally conceived of the journal, was to be the home for the study of the preternatural— but the preternatural as the preternatural. It was to be a rigorous textual space for the study of this epistemological space. To be sure, the last generation has seen a burgeoning of scholarship on the likes of aliens, demons, revenants, monsters, ghosts and spirits, and on magic and occultism, too. But while these studies have been fascinating in themselves from the founding editors: thinking preternaturally after ten years\",\"PeriodicalId\":41216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/preternature.10.2.0159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/preternature.10.2.0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超自然,第10卷,第2期,2021版权©2021宾夕法尼亚州立大学,大学公园,宾夕法尼亚州。在1605年出版的《学习进展》一书中,弗朗西斯·培根主张建立一个研究“自然错误或变化”的项目,作为他关于自然、自然属性和极限的通史的一部分。他接着解释说,这种“奇迹史”将不同于“生物史”和“艺术史”,因为它将以自然的偏离为中心。也就是说,它将关注那些自然在其运作中偏离其通常过程而产生奇怪效果的实例。他哀叹道,虽然他能找到“许多关于神话般的实验、秘密和无聊的恶作剧的书”,但他却找不到“一本完整而严谨的、经过仔细研究和描述的异类或自然界不规则现象的合集”(Bacon 1605: sig. Bb4r)。然而,他认为,这些例子很重要,因为它们可能揭示出迄今为止奇怪但完全自然的效果,可以用来改善人类的福祉。当我们创立《超自然》时,我们的目标是再一次接受培根的挑战,尽管有点迟,而且目的也有所不同。我们把注意力集中在杂志的标题上,因为它很好地描绘了自然和超自然之间的那片空间,这片空间被感知和想象的生物所困扰,它们的存在完全无法用理性主义来解释。《超自然》,正如我们最初设想的那样,是研究超自然现象的家——但超自然现象就是超自然现象。这是一个严谨的文本空间,用来研究认识论空间。可以肯定的是,在过去的一代人中,关于外星人、恶魔、亡魂、怪物、鬼魂和灵魂,以及魔法和神秘学的学术研究蓬勃发展。但是,尽管这些研究本身就很吸引人,但从创始编辑的角度来看:十年后的超自然思维
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From the Founding Editors: Thinking Preternaturally After Ten Years
preternature, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021 Copyright © 2021 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa. In his 1605 Advancement of Learning, Francis Bacon advocated for a program that investigated “nature erring, or varying” as part of his general history of nature, its properties and limits. This “history of marvels,” as he went on to explain, would be distinct from that of the “history of creatures,” and the “history of arts,” in that it would center upon nature’s digressions. That is to say, it would be concerned with those instances in which nature diverged in its operation from its usual course to produce strange effects. While he could find “a number of books of fabulous Experiments, & Secrets, and frivolous Impostures for pleasure and strangenesse,” he lamented, he could not find “a substantiall and severe Collection of HETEROCLITES, or IRREGULARS of NATURE, well examined & described” (Bacon 1605: sig. Bb4r). Yet such instances were important, he thought, for they might betray hitherto strange but wholly natural effects that might be harnessed to improve human welfare. Our goal when we founded Preternature was to take up Bacon’s challenge once more, albeit a tad belatedly and to different ends. We fixed on the journal’s title, for it nicely delineated that sliver of space between the natural and the supernatural haunted by the creatures of perception and imagination, whose existence defies mere rationalistic explanation. Preternature, as we originally conceived of the journal, was to be the home for the study of the preternatural— but the preternatural as the preternatural. It was to be a rigorous textual space for the study of this epistemological space. To be sure, the last generation has seen a burgeoning of scholarship on the likes of aliens, demons, revenants, monsters, ghosts and spirits, and on magic and occultism, too. But while these studies have been fascinating in themselves from the founding editors: thinking preternaturally after ten years
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Preternature provides an interdisciplinary, inclusive forum for the study of topics that stand in the liminal space between the known world and the inexplicable. The journal embraces a broad and dynamic definition of the preternatural that encompasses the weird and uncanny—magic, witchcraft, spiritualism, occultism, esotericism, demonology, monstrophy, and more, recognizing that the areas of magic, religion, and science are fluid and that their intersections should continue to be explored, contextualized, and challenged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信