在创伤电影范式的背景下观察酒精性近视:中枢和外周细节的差异回忆。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Anna E. Jaffe, C. Harris, D. DiLillo
{"title":"在创伤电影范式的背景下观察酒精性近视:中枢和外周细节的差异回忆。","authors":"Anna E. Jaffe, C. Harris, D. DiLillo","doi":"10.1111/acer.14156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nA major tenet of the Alcohol Myopia Model is that intoxication results in a narrowing of attention to the most central environmental cues, at the cost of more peripheral information. Though long hypothesized, no known study of alcohol myopia has demonstrated differential immediate recall of central and peripheral cues using a standardized task. To address this gap, we conducted an alcohol administration study with a clear, standardized focus-a trauma film.\n\n\nMETHODS\nNinety-eight female social drinkers completed self-report measures, and then were randomized to consume a placebo beverage, a low dose of alcohol (mean Breath Alcohol Concentration [BrAC] = .04%), or a high dose of alcohol (mean BrAC = .11%). Participants then moved to a staged room where they viewed a film clip depicting a sexual assault. After leaving the room, participants completed a written free recall task of the film and the room.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe distinction between recall of central and peripheral details was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Consistent with the Alcohol Myopia Model, relative to placebo, a high dose of alcohol led to impaired recall of peripheral (but not central) details. Although the interaction between BrAC and information type (central vs. peripheral) was not statistically significant, simple effects revealed a strong association between BrAC and peripheral information, and no association between BrAC and central information. Bolstering myopia as an explanation for our findings, neither central nor peripheral information correlated with self-reported tendencies to dissociate or distract oneself, or typical alcohol consumption or expectancies.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlcohol myopia can be observed through an immediate free recall task following a stressful film. Additional research is needed to continue evaluating dose-dependent differential recall in larger samples. This task may be useful for clarifying the role of alcohol myopia in clinical phenomena, such as aggressive behavior and processing traumatic events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":7410,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observing Alcohol Myopia in the Context of a Trauma Film Paradigm: Differential Recall of Central and Peripheral Details.\",\"authors\":\"Anna E. Jaffe, C. Harris, D. DiLillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acer.14156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nA major tenet of the Alcohol Myopia Model is that intoxication results in a narrowing of attention to the most central environmental cues, at the cost of more peripheral information. Though long hypothesized, no known study of alcohol myopia has demonstrated differential immediate recall of central and peripheral cues using a standardized task. To address this gap, we conducted an alcohol administration study with a clear, standardized focus-a trauma film.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nNinety-eight female social drinkers completed self-report measures, and then were randomized to consume a placebo beverage, a low dose of alcohol (mean Breath Alcohol Concentration [BrAC] = .04%), or a high dose of alcohol (mean BrAC = .11%). Participants then moved to a staged room where they viewed a film clip depicting a sexual assault. After leaving the room, participants completed a written free recall task of the film and the room.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe distinction between recall of central and peripheral details was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Consistent with the Alcohol Myopia Model, relative to placebo, a high dose of alcohol led to impaired recall of peripheral (but not central) details. Although the interaction between BrAC and information type (central vs. peripheral) was not statistically significant, simple effects revealed a strong association between BrAC and peripheral information, and no association between BrAC and central information. Bolstering myopia as an explanation for our findings, neither central nor peripheral information correlated with self-reported tendencies to dissociate or distract oneself, or typical alcohol consumption or expectancies.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nAlcohol myopia can be observed through an immediate free recall task following a stressful film. Additional research is needed to continue evaluating dose-dependent differential recall in larger samples. This task may be useful for clarifying the role of alcohol myopia in clinical phenomena, such as aggressive behavior and processing traumatic events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

酒精近视模型的一个主要原则是,醉酒会导致对最中心的环境线索的注意力缩小,以牺牲更多的外围信息为代价。虽然这是一个长期的假设,但目前还没有关于酒精性近视的研究表明,使用标准化任务对中枢和外围线索的即时回忆存在差异。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项酒精管理研究,其明确、标准化的焦点是创伤片。方法98名女性社交饮酒者完成了自我报告测量,然后被随机分为饮用安慰剂饮料、低剂量酒精(平均呼气酒精浓度[BrAC] = 0.04%)和高剂量酒精(平均BrAC = 0.11%)。然后,参与者被转移到一个布置好的房间,在那里他们观看了一段描述性侵犯的电影片段。离开房间后,参与者完成了一项关于电影和房间的书面自由回忆任务。结果验证性因子分析支持中心细节和外围细节回忆的差异。与酒精近视模型相一致的是,相对于安慰剂,高剂量的酒精会导致外围(但不是中心)细节的回忆受损。尽管BrAC与信息类型(中枢与外周)之间的交互作用在统计学上不显著,但简单效应显示BrAC与外周信息之间存在较强的关联,而与中枢信息之间没有关联。支持近视作为我们研究结果的解释,无论是中心信息还是外围信息都与自我报告的分离或分散自己的倾向,或典型的酒精消费或预期无关。结论酒精性近视可通过紧张观影后即刻自由回忆任务观察。需要进一步的研究来继续在更大的样本中评估剂量依赖性差异召回。这项任务可能有助于澄清酒精性近视在临床现象中的作用,如攻击行为和处理创伤事件。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observing Alcohol Myopia in the Context of a Trauma Film Paradigm: Differential Recall of Central and Peripheral Details.
BACKGROUND A major tenet of the Alcohol Myopia Model is that intoxication results in a narrowing of attention to the most central environmental cues, at the cost of more peripheral information. Though long hypothesized, no known study of alcohol myopia has demonstrated differential immediate recall of central and peripheral cues using a standardized task. To address this gap, we conducted an alcohol administration study with a clear, standardized focus-a trauma film. METHODS Ninety-eight female social drinkers completed self-report measures, and then were randomized to consume a placebo beverage, a low dose of alcohol (mean Breath Alcohol Concentration [BrAC] = .04%), or a high dose of alcohol (mean BrAC = .11%). Participants then moved to a staged room where they viewed a film clip depicting a sexual assault. After leaving the room, participants completed a written free recall task of the film and the room. RESULTS The distinction between recall of central and peripheral details was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Consistent with the Alcohol Myopia Model, relative to placebo, a high dose of alcohol led to impaired recall of peripheral (but not central) details. Although the interaction between BrAC and information type (central vs. peripheral) was not statistically significant, simple effects revealed a strong association between BrAC and peripheral information, and no association between BrAC and central information. Bolstering myopia as an explanation for our findings, neither central nor peripheral information correlated with self-reported tendencies to dissociate or distract oneself, or typical alcohol consumption or expectancies. CONCLUSIONS Alcohol myopia can be observed through an immediate free recall task following a stressful film. Additional research is needed to continue evaluating dose-dependent differential recall in larger samples. This task may be useful for clarifying the role of alcohol myopia in clinical phenomena, such as aggressive behavior and processing traumatic events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
219
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research''s scope spans animal and human clinical research, epidemiological, experimental, policy, and historical research relating to any aspect of alcohol abuse, dependence, or alcoholism. This journal uses a multi-disciplinary approach in its scope of alcoholism, its causes, clinical and animal effect, consequences, patterns, treatments and recovery, predictors and prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信