标准英语中的否定倒装

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Odisea Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.25115/odisea.v0i20.3632
Lucía Muñoz Martín
{"title":"标准英语中的否定倒装","authors":"Lucía Muñoz Martín","doi":"10.25115/odisea.v0i20.3632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes a descriptive approach to several  properties of Negative Inversion (NI) in Standard English found controversial in prescriptive writings, comparing what has been previously written in the literature with real native English speakers’ grammaticality judgements gathered via a questionnaire. These topics include the disagreement on the optionality of subject-auxiliary (subj-aux) inversion, the different approaches to an accurate syntax analysis, whether NI behaves as a Root Phenomenon (RT) or not,  and the inaccurate classification of Only Inversion as a subtype of NI.","PeriodicalId":33609,"journal":{"name":"Odisea","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEGATIVE INVERSION IN STANDARD ENGLISH\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Muñoz Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.25115/odisea.v0i20.3632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper takes a descriptive approach to several  properties of Negative Inversion (NI) in Standard English found controversial in prescriptive writings, comparing what has been previously written in the literature with real native English speakers’ grammaticality judgements gathered via a questionnaire. These topics include the disagreement on the optionality of subject-auxiliary (subj-aux) inversion, the different approaches to an accurate syntax analysis, whether NI behaves as a Root Phenomenon (RT) or not,  and the inaccurate classification of Only Inversion as a subtype of NI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Odisea\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Odisea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i20.3632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odisea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i20.3632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对标准英语中在规定性写作中存在争议的否定倒转(NI)的几个特性进行了描述,并将之前的文献与通过问卷调查收集的真实英语母语人士的语法判断进行了比较。这些主题包括对主语-辅助(subject-aux)倒换的可选性的分歧,准确语法分析的不同方法,NI是否表现为根现象(RT),以及将Only倒换作为NI的子类型的不准确分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NEGATIVE INVERSION IN STANDARD ENGLISH
This paper takes a descriptive approach to several  properties of Negative Inversion (NI) in Standard English found controversial in prescriptive writings, comparing what has been previously written in the literature with real native English speakers’ grammaticality judgements gathered via a questionnaire. These topics include the disagreement on the optionality of subject-auxiliary (subj-aux) inversion, the different approaches to an accurate syntax analysis, whether NI behaves as a Root Phenomenon (RT) or not,  and the inaccurate classification of Only Inversion as a subtype of NI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信