胸腺恶性肿瘤质子与碳离子放射治疗的剂量学比较研究及近期临床疗效

Q4 Medicine
Jian Chen, N. Ma, Yan Lu, K. Shahnazi, Jingfang Zhao, J. Lu, G. Jiang, J. Mao
{"title":"胸腺恶性肿瘤质子与碳离子放射治疗的剂量学比较研究及近期临床疗效","authors":"Jian Chen, N. Ma, Yan Lu, K. Shahnazi, Jingfang Zhao, J. Lu, G. Jiang, J. Mao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare dose distributions between photon versus proton and carbon ion radiotherapy (particle therapy, PT) among patients with gross tumors, and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PT for thymic malignancies (TM). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom Sept 2015 to Aug 2018, 19 patients with TM who underwent non-palliative PT using pencil beam scanning technique in our hospital and had at least one follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Diseases staged from Ⅰ-ⅣB including 15 Ⅲ-ⅣB. All the patients had pathological diagnosis with 10 thymomas, 6 carcinomas and 3 neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus. A set of dosimetric comparisons were conducted in patients with gross tumors at a total dose of 66 GyE, in 33 fractions for photon or proton beams and in 22 fractions for carbon ion beams. Five patients without any local treatment and 7 patients after R2 resection received radical radiotherapy of proton 44.0-48.4 GyE in 20-22 fractions plus carbon ion 21.0-23.1 GyE in 7 fractions, 1 case after complete resection (R0 resection) had proton 45 GyE in 25 fractions, 5 cases after R1 resection had proton 60.0-61.6 GyE in 28-30 fractions and 1 case of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy had only carbon ion 60 GyE in 20 fractions. \n \n \nResults \nThe median follow up time was 19.0 (2.4-42.9) months. There were 13 patients with gross tumors, with a median largest diameter of 5.7 (2.7-12.8) cm. The dosimetric study showed that proton and carbon-ion plans significantly reduced the maximum dose to the spinal cord, the mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs) including the lung/heart/esophagus, and the integral dose of the exposed area about 25%-65% compared to photon plans. No other toxicities ≥ grade 3 were observed except one myocardial infarction (grade 4 late toxicity). There was no local failure observed. Metastasis to regional lymph node, lung, pleura, skull base, bone or liver occurred in 4 patients with Ⅲ-ⅣB stage disease in 6.1-22.8 months after treatment. The 2-year local control and overall survival rates were 100%, disease free survival and distant metastasis free survival rates were 64.6%. \n \n \nConclusions \nFor TMs, PT has significant advantages over photon in terms of sparing OARs, and is safe and effective in patients with TMs after short-time follow-up. \n \n \nKey words: \nThymic malignancies; Proton; Carbon ion; Radiotherapy; Pencil beam scanning","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"1 1","pages":"221-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric comparison study and short-term clinical outcomes of proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for thymic malignancies\",\"authors\":\"Jian Chen, N. Ma, Yan Lu, K. Shahnazi, Jingfang Zhao, J. Lu, G. Jiang, J. Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare dose distributions between photon versus proton and carbon ion radiotherapy (particle therapy, PT) among patients with gross tumors, and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PT for thymic malignancies (TM). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom Sept 2015 to Aug 2018, 19 patients with TM who underwent non-palliative PT using pencil beam scanning technique in our hospital and had at least one follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Diseases staged from Ⅰ-ⅣB including 15 Ⅲ-ⅣB. All the patients had pathological diagnosis with 10 thymomas, 6 carcinomas and 3 neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus. A set of dosimetric comparisons were conducted in patients with gross tumors at a total dose of 66 GyE, in 33 fractions for photon or proton beams and in 22 fractions for carbon ion beams. Five patients without any local treatment and 7 patients after R2 resection received radical radiotherapy of proton 44.0-48.4 GyE in 20-22 fractions plus carbon ion 21.0-23.1 GyE in 7 fractions, 1 case after complete resection (R0 resection) had proton 45 GyE in 25 fractions, 5 cases after R1 resection had proton 60.0-61.6 GyE in 28-30 fractions and 1 case of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy had only carbon ion 60 GyE in 20 fractions. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe median follow up time was 19.0 (2.4-42.9) months. There were 13 patients with gross tumors, with a median largest diameter of 5.7 (2.7-12.8) cm. The dosimetric study showed that proton and carbon-ion plans significantly reduced the maximum dose to the spinal cord, the mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs) including the lung/heart/esophagus, and the integral dose of the exposed area about 25%-65% compared to photon plans. No other toxicities ≥ grade 3 were observed except one myocardial infarction (grade 4 late toxicity). There was no local failure observed. Metastasis to regional lymph node, lung, pleura, skull base, bone or liver occurred in 4 patients with Ⅲ-ⅣB stage disease in 6.1-22.8 months after treatment. The 2-year local control and overall survival rates were 100%, disease free survival and distant metastasis free survival rates were 64.6%. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nFor TMs, PT has significant advantages over photon in terms of sparing OARs, and is safe and effective in patients with TMs after short-time follow-up. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nThymic malignancies; Proton; Carbon ion; Radiotherapy; Pencil beam scanning\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"221-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较光子与质子碳离子放射治疗(粒子治疗,PT)在大体肿瘤患者中的剂量分布,评价粒子治疗胸腺恶性肿瘤(TM)的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析我院2015年9月至2018年8月19例采用铅笔束扫描技术行非姑息性PT治疗且至少1次随访的TM患者。疾病分期为Ⅰ-ⅣB,包括15个Ⅲ-ⅣB。病理诊断为胸腺瘤10例,癌6例,胸腺神经内分泌肿瘤3例。在总剂量为66 GyE的肿瘤患者中进行了一组剂量学比较,光子或质子束分为33组,碳离子束分为22组。5例患者未经局部治疗,R2切除后7例患者行根治性放疗,20 ~ 22分质子44.0 ~ 48.4 GyE加7分碳离子21.0 ~ 23.1 GyE, 1例完全切除(R0切除)后25分质子45 GyE, 5例R1切除后28 ~ 30分质子60.0 ~ 61.6 GyE, 1例术后复发放疗后仅20分碳离子60 GyE。结果中位随访时间为19.0(2.4 ~ 42.9)个月。13例大体肿瘤,中位最大直径为5.7 (2.7-12.8)cm。剂量学研究表明,质子和碳离子方案比光子方案显著降低了脊髓的最大剂量、肺/心/食道等危险器官的平均剂量和暴露区域的积分剂量,约为25%-65%。除一例心肌梗死(4级晚期毒性)外,未观察到其他≥3级的毒性。没有观察到局部失败。4例Ⅲ~ⅣB期患者在治疗后6.1 ~ 22.8个月发生局部淋巴结、肺、胸膜、颅底、骨或肝脏转移。2年局部对照和总生存率为100%,无病生存率和无远处转移生存率为64.6%。结论对于TMs患者,PT在保留桨叶方面比光子有明显优势,且经短时间随访,PT对TMs患者安全有效。关键词:胸腺恶性肿瘤;质子;碳离子;放射治疗;铅笔束扫描
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dosimetric comparison study and short-term clinical outcomes of proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for thymic malignancies
Objective To compare dose distributions between photon versus proton and carbon ion radiotherapy (particle therapy, PT) among patients with gross tumors, and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PT for thymic malignancies (TM). Methods From Sept 2015 to Aug 2018, 19 patients with TM who underwent non-palliative PT using pencil beam scanning technique in our hospital and had at least one follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Diseases staged from Ⅰ-ⅣB including 15 Ⅲ-ⅣB. All the patients had pathological diagnosis with 10 thymomas, 6 carcinomas and 3 neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus. A set of dosimetric comparisons were conducted in patients with gross tumors at a total dose of 66 GyE, in 33 fractions for photon or proton beams and in 22 fractions for carbon ion beams. Five patients without any local treatment and 7 patients after R2 resection received radical radiotherapy of proton 44.0-48.4 GyE in 20-22 fractions plus carbon ion 21.0-23.1 GyE in 7 fractions, 1 case after complete resection (R0 resection) had proton 45 GyE in 25 fractions, 5 cases after R1 resection had proton 60.0-61.6 GyE in 28-30 fractions and 1 case of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy had only carbon ion 60 GyE in 20 fractions. Results The median follow up time was 19.0 (2.4-42.9) months. There were 13 patients with gross tumors, with a median largest diameter of 5.7 (2.7-12.8) cm. The dosimetric study showed that proton and carbon-ion plans significantly reduced the maximum dose to the spinal cord, the mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs) including the lung/heart/esophagus, and the integral dose of the exposed area about 25%-65% compared to photon plans. No other toxicities ≥ grade 3 were observed except one myocardial infarction (grade 4 late toxicity). There was no local failure observed. Metastasis to regional lymph node, lung, pleura, skull base, bone or liver occurred in 4 patients with Ⅲ-ⅣB stage disease in 6.1-22.8 months after treatment. The 2-year local control and overall survival rates were 100%, disease free survival and distant metastasis free survival rates were 64.6%. Conclusions For TMs, PT has significant advantages over photon in terms of sparing OARs, and is safe and effective in patients with TMs after short-time follow-up. Key words: Thymic malignancies; Proton; Carbon ion; Radiotherapy; Pencil beam scanning
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信