聚合酶链反应检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌不同表型方法的比较

Nupur Gupta, M. Jais, P. Shrivastava, Aditi Sharma
{"title":"聚合酶链反应检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌不同表型方法的比较","authors":"Nupur Gupta, M. Jais, P. Shrivastava, Aditi Sharma","doi":"10.5799/jmid.1176537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic methods of Oxacillin Disk Diffusion, Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion, Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base, and CHROM Agar MRSA with the gold-standard method of Polymerase Chain Reaction for detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. \nMethods: Two hundred pus samples were included in the study from which Staphylococcus strains were evaluated. The isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were subjected to the Oxacillin Disk Diffusion test, Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test, Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base, and CHROM Agar MRSA to detect MRSA with PCR, the reference standard. The diagnostic techniques were compared to their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values. \nResults: The sensitivity of the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test was 100%, followed by CHROM Agar MRSA at 96.7%, Oxacillin Disk Diffusion at 90%, and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base at 86.7%. Most specific was the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test (99.4%), followed by Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base (98.8%), CHROM Agar MRSA (97.7%), and the least specific was the Oxacillin Disk Diffusion test (96.5%). \nConclusion: The Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test was the most sensitive and specific of all four methods, next to the Polymerase Chain Reaction. However, future multicentric studies are recommended to test this method across all prevalent centers of methicillin resistance. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 12(3):116-126.","PeriodicalId":16603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Phenotypic Methods of Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Polymerase Chain Reaction\",\"authors\":\"Nupur Gupta, M. Jais, P. Shrivastava, Aditi Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.5799/jmid.1176537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic methods of Oxacillin Disk Diffusion, Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion, Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base, and CHROM Agar MRSA with the gold-standard method of Polymerase Chain Reaction for detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. \\nMethods: Two hundred pus samples were included in the study from which Staphylococcus strains were evaluated. The isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were subjected to the Oxacillin Disk Diffusion test, Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test, Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base, and CHROM Agar MRSA to detect MRSA with PCR, the reference standard. The diagnostic techniques were compared to their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values. \\nResults: The sensitivity of the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test was 100%, followed by CHROM Agar MRSA at 96.7%, Oxacillin Disk Diffusion at 90%, and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base at 86.7%. Most specific was the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test (99.4%), followed by Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base (98.8%), CHROM Agar MRSA (97.7%), and the least specific was the Oxacillin Disk Diffusion test (96.5%). \\nConclusion: The Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test was the most sensitive and specific of all four methods, next to the Polymerase Chain Reaction. However, future multicentric studies are recommended to test this method across all prevalent centers of methicillin resistance. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 12(3):116-126.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5799/jmid.1176537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5799/jmid.1176537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较奥西林盘片扩散法、头孢西林盘片扩散法、奥西林耐药筛选琼脂碱基法和CHROM琼脂MRSA法与聚合酶链反应金标准法检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的诊断方法。方法:选取200份脓液标本进行葡萄球菌鉴定。对分离的金黄色葡萄球菌进行奥西林盘片扩散试验、头孢西丁盘片扩散试验、奥西林耐药筛选琼脂碱基和CHROM琼脂MRSA,以PCR为参比标准检测MRSA。比较诊断技术的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:头孢西丁纸片扩散试验的敏感性为100%,其次是CHROM琼脂MRSA试验的敏感性为96.7%,Oxacillin纸片扩散试验的敏感性为90%,Oxacillin耐药筛选琼脂基础试验的敏感性为86.7%。头孢西林盘片扩散试验的特异性最高(99.4%),其次是奥西林耐药筛选琼脂基(98.8%)、CHROM琼脂MRSA(97.7%),特异性最低的是奥西林盘片扩散试验(96.5%)。结论:头孢西丁纸片扩散试验在4种方法中灵敏度最高,特异度仅次于聚合酶链反应法。然而,未来的多中心研究建议在所有甲氧西林耐药流行中心测试这种方法。中华微生物学杂志[J];12(3): 116 - 126。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Phenotypic Methods of Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Polymerase Chain Reaction
Objectives: The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic methods of Oxacillin Disk Diffusion, Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion, Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base, and CHROM Agar MRSA with the gold-standard method of Polymerase Chain Reaction for detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: Two hundred pus samples were included in the study from which Staphylococcus strains were evaluated. The isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were subjected to the Oxacillin Disk Diffusion test, Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test, Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base, and CHROM Agar MRSA to detect MRSA with PCR, the reference standard. The diagnostic techniques were compared to their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values. Results: The sensitivity of the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test was 100%, followed by CHROM Agar MRSA at 96.7%, Oxacillin Disk Diffusion at 90%, and Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base at 86.7%. Most specific was the Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test (99.4%), followed by Oxacillin Resistance Screening Agar Base (98.8%), CHROM Agar MRSA (97.7%), and the least specific was the Oxacillin Disk Diffusion test (96.5%). Conclusion: The Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion test was the most sensitive and specific of all four methods, next to the Polymerase Chain Reaction. However, future multicentric studies are recommended to test this method across all prevalent centers of methicillin resistance. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 12(3):116-126.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信