控制呼吸对健康成人自主心脏调节的影响

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
L. J. Rubin Neto, K. S. Lima, Murilo Rezende de Oliveira, N. C. Righi, R. Jaenisch, G. Puntel, Antônio Marcos Vargas da Silva, L. U. Signori
{"title":"控制呼吸对健康成人自主心脏调节的影响","authors":"L. J. Rubin Neto, K. S. Lima, Murilo Rezende de Oliveira, N. C. Righi, R. Jaenisch, G. Puntel, Antônio Marcos Vargas da Silva, L. U. Signori","doi":"10.4025/actascihealthsci.v45i1.60429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heart rate variability (HRV) is a technique that indirectly assesses the activities of the autonomic nervous system in the heart. However, during data collection there are controversies regarding the use of spontaneous or controlled breath. The aim of this research was to compare the effects of controlled and spontaneous breath on HRV in healthy adults.The present cross-sectional study held a sample of 52 healthy volunteers (22 male, 42.3%), average of 25 (±4) years old and body mass index 22.4 (±2.7) kgm-². All the volunteers were evaluated in 2 days (at most three days between the evaluations). On each day the data were collected with spontaneous and then controlled breath (12 breaths per minute - bpm: Inspiration/Expiration: 2/3). Data were collected with a pulse frequency meter (Polar brand, model 810i). The HRV was evaluated for time and frequency domain and was analyzed using an area corresponding to 5 minutes (containing at least 256 beats per minute) by Kubios program version 2.1. In the time domain, no differences were observed between spontaneous and controlled breath. In the frequency domain, the controlled breathing reduced sympathetic activity (p<0.001) in approximately 14% and increased (p<0.001) parasympathetic activity proportionally. The autonomic modulation evaluated by low frequency/ high frequency(LF/HF) ratio decreased (p<0.001) in average -0.6 on the days evaluated. The controlled breathing (12 bpm) decrease sympathetic activity and increases parasympathetic by modifying the heart autonomic modulation.","PeriodicalId":42839,"journal":{"name":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of controlled breath on healthy adult autonomic heart modulation\",\"authors\":\"L. J. Rubin Neto, K. S. Lima, Murilo Rezende de Oliveira, N. C. Righi, R. Jaenisch, G. Puntel, Antônio Marcos Vargas da Silva, L. U. Signori\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/actascihealthsci.v45i1.60429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heart rate variability (HRV) is a technique that indirectly assesses the activities of the autonomic nervous system in the heart. However, during data collection there are controversies regarding the use of spontaneous or controlled breath. The aim of this research was to compare the effects of controlled and spontaneous breath on HRV in healthy adults.The present cross-sectional study held a sample of 52 healthy volunteers (22 male, 42.3%), average of 25 (±4) years old and body mass index 22.4 (±2.7) kgm-². All the volunteers were evaluated in 2 days (at most three days between the evaluations). On each day the data were collected with spontaneous and then controlled breath (12 breaths per minute - bpm: Inspiration/Expiration: 2/3). Data were collected with a pulse frequency meter (Polar brand, model 810i). The HRV was evaluated for time and frequency domain and was analyzed using an area corresponding to 5 minutes (containing at least 256 beats per minute) by Kubios program version 2.1. In the time domain, no differences were observed between spontaneous and controlled breath. In the frequency domain, the controlled breathing reduced sympathetic activity (p<0.001) in approximately 14% and increased (p<0.001) parasympathetic activity proportionally. The autonomic modulation evaluated by low frequency/ high frequency(LF/HF) ratio decreased (p<0.001) in average -0.6 on the days evaluated. The controlled breathing (12 bpm) decrease sympathetic activity and increases parasympathetic by modifying the heart autonomic modulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v45i1.60429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v45i1.60429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心率变异性(HRV)是一种间接评估心脏自主神经系统活动的技术。然而,在数据收集过程中,关于使用自主呼吸或控制呼吸存在争议。本研究的目的是比较控制呼吸和自主呼吸对健康成人HRV的影响。本横断面研究选取52名健康志愿者,其中男性22名,占42.3%,平均年龄25(±4)岁,体重指数22.4(±2.7)kgm-²。所有志愿者在2天内进行评估(两次评估之间最多间隔3天)。每天收集自发呼吸和控制呼吸(每分钟12次呼吸- bpm:吸气/呼气:2/3)的数据。使用脉冲频率计(Polar品牌,型号810i)收集数据。使用Kubios 2.1版程序对HRV进行时域和频域评估,并使用对应于5分钟(至少每分钟256次)的区域进行分析。在时域上,自发呼吸和控制呼吸没有差别。在频域,控制呼吸减少了约14%的交感神经活动(p<0.001),并按比例增加了副交感神经活动(p<0.001)。以低频/高频(LF/HF)比值评价的自主神经调节在评价日平均下降-0.6 (p<0.001)。控制呼吸(每分钟12次)通过改变心脏自主调节减少交感神经活动,增加副交感神经。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of controlled breath on healthy adult autonomic heart modulation
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a technique that indirectly assesses the activities of the autonomic nervous system in the heart. However, during data collection there are controversies regarding the use of spontaneous or controlled breath. The aim of this research was to compare the effects of controlled and spontaneous breath on HRV in healthy adults.The present cross-sectional study held a sample of 52 healthy volunteers (22 male, 42.3%), average of 25 (±4) years old and body mass index 22.4 (±2.7) kgm-². All the volunteers were evaluated in 2 days (at most three days between the evaluations). On each day the data were collected with spontaneous and then controlled breath (12 breaths per minute - bpm: Inspiration/Expiration: 2/3). Data were collected with a pulse frequency meter (Polar brand, model 810i). The HRV was evaluated for time and frequency domain and was analyzed using an area corresponding to 5 minutes (containing at least 256 beats per minute) by Kubios program version 2.1. In the time domain, no differences were observed between spontaneous and controlled breath. In the frequency domain, the controlled breathing reduced sympathetic activity (p<0.001) in approximately 14% and increased (p<0.001) parasympathetic activity proportionally. The autonomic modulation evaluated by low frequency/ high frequency(LF/HF) ratio decreased (p<0.001) in average -0.6 on the days evaluated. The controlled breathing (12 bpm) decrease sympathetic activity and increases parasympathetic by modifying the heart autonomic modulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers in Health Sciences, such as Clinical Analyses; Physical Education, Nursing, Pharmacy; Pharmacology, Phoniatry and Audiology, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Medicine, Nutrition, Dentistry and Public Health Policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信