麻黄素和肾上腺素在剖宫产术后蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)后低血压治疗中的作用

M. Rahman, U. Khatun, M. Hasan, Md Tanveer Alam, Mohammed Mohiuddin Shoman, Rebeka Sultana
{"title":"麻黄素和肾上腺素在剖宫产术后蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)后低血压治疗中的作用","authors":"M. Rahman, U. Khatun, M. Hasan, Md Tanveer Alam, Mohammed Mohiuddin Shoman, Rebeka Sultana","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Caesarean section is a common operation in obstetrics and usually performed by subarachnoidblock (spinal anaesthesia). The principal advantages of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean deliveryare its simplicity, speed, reliability, & minimal foetal exposure to depressant drugs. The parturient remainsawake, & the hazards of aspiration are minimized.1Hypotension remains the most common complication associated with spinal anaesthesia for caesareandelivery. It can have detrimental effect on both mother & neonate ; these effects include impaired foetaloxygenation with asphyxial stress & foetal acidosis, & maternal symptoms of low cardiac output , suchas nausea, vomiting, dizziness, & impaired consciousness .2 Excessive hypotension may potentially producemyocardial and cerebral ischaemia, and is associated with neonatal acidaemia.3 Maternal hypotensionlasting more than 2 minutes should be avoided , as it may be associated with lower Apgar scores.1Hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section has an incidence up to 80% without prophylacticmanagement.4 Recommended measures to decrease the incidence of hypotension include pre-hydrationwith 1000-1500 ml of lactated Ringer’s solution & maintaining left uterine displacement duringanaesthesia.1Despite these conservative measures, a vasopressor drug is often required. The drug usually recommendedin this context is ephedrine, which is effective in restoring maternal arterial pressure after hypotension.2Despite the wide acceptance of ephedrine as the vasopressor of choice for obstetric anaesthesia5, itssuperiority over other vasopressors has not been clearly defined and its position has been challengedbecause of potential complications that include supraventricular tachycardia, tachyphylaxis and foetalacidosis.6,7Moreover, when the fall of blood pressure is much greater, ephedrine does not exhibit prompt effect; inthat case, epinephrine would be the better option as a vasopressor agent in restoring maternal arterialpressure as because it is very quick on onset & very potent on action and does not exhibit tachyphylaxis.This study assesses whether the use of Ephedrine and Epinephrine are different in their efficacy formanaging maternal hypotension and their effects on neonatal outcome in women having spinal anaesthesiafor caesarean delivery.\nSummary: One hundred and sixty-seven (167) healthy patients, aged between 20 to 40 years, undergoingelective caesarean section under subarachnoid block (SAB) were assessed to determine maternalhaemodynamic changes and neonatal Apgar score. Among the 167 patients, sixty (60) patients developedhypotension; These 60 patients were divided into two groups.In Group A (n=26), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased 83.56 (±4.84) mm Hg and Ephedrine wasgiven in 5 mg increments to maintain SBP > 90 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also reduced to61.26 (±4.94) mm Hg from its baseline value of 76.24 (±7.35) mm Hg and following Ephedrine therapy itrestored toward baseline value, 70.32 (±5.67). In Group B (n=27), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased84.12 (±4.36) mm Hg and Epinephrine was given in 20 μgm increments to maintain SBP > 90 mm Hg.Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also reduced to 62.19 (±4.78) mm Hg from its baseline value of 74.94(±7.05) mm Hg and following Epinephrine therapy it remained close to the value obtained duringhypotension, 63.06 (±3.59). Both the vasopressors restored the heart rate (HR) towards normal like 78.43(±7.35), & 82.85 (±5.68) from 108.24 (±8.45) & 109.34 (±11.04) beats/min, during hypotension by intravenousephedrine and epinephrine respectively.\nConclusion: Use of Ephedrine and Epinephrine for the management of maternal hypotension doesn’taffect the neonatal outcome; neonatal Apgar score remains satisfactory. Epinephrine causes promptrestoration of systolic blood pressure towards baseline but doesn’t increase the diastolic blood pressure,thus may compromise the coronary perfusion. On the other hand, Ephedrine increases both systolic &diastolic blood pressure and to be used routinely for the management of hypotension during caesareansection under subarachnoid block.\nJBSA 2017; 30(2): 53-65","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Ephedrine and Epinephrine in the Management of Hypotension after Sub-Arachnoid Block (SAB) in Caesarean Section\",\"authors\":\"M. Rahman, U. Khatun, M. Hasan, Md Tanveer Alam, Mohammed Mohiuddin Shoman, Rebeka Sultana\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Caesarean section is a common operation in obstetrics and usually performed by subarachnoidblock (spinal anaesthesia). The principal advantages of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean deliveryare its simplicity, speed, reliability, & minimal foetal exposure to depressant drugs. The parturient remainsawake, & the hazards of aspiration are minimized.1Hypotension remains the most common complication associated with spinal anaesthesia for caesareandelivery. It can have detrimental effect on both mother & neonate ; these effects include impaired foetaloxygenation with asphyxial stress & foetal acidosis, & maternal symptoms of low cardiac output , suchas nausea, vomiting, dizziness, & impaired consciousness .2 Excessive hypotension may potentially producemyocardial and cerebral ischaemia, and is associated with neonatal acidaemia.3 Maternal hypotensionlasting more than 2 minutes should be avoided , as it may be associated with lower Apgar scores.1Hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section has an incidence up to 80% without prophylacticmanagement.4 Recommended measures to decrease the incidence of hypotension include pre-hydrationwith 1000-1500 ml of lactated Ringer’s solution & maintaining left uterine displacement duringanaesthesia.1Despite these conservative measures, a vasopressor drug is often required. The drug usually recommendedin this context is ephedrine, which is effective in restoring maternal arterial pressure after hypotension.2Despite the wide acceptance of ephedrine as the vasopressor of choice for obstetric anaesthesia5, itssuperiority over other vasopressors has not been clearly defined and its position has been challengedbecause of potential complications that include supraventricular tachycardia, tachyphylaxis and foetalacidosis.6,7Moreover, when the fall of blood pressure is much greater, ephedrine does not exhibit prompt effect; inthat case, epinephrine would be the better option as a vasopressor agent in restoring maternal arterialpressure as because it is very quick on onset & very potent on action and does not exhibit tachyphylaxis.This study assesses whether the use of Ephedrine and Epinephrine are different in their efficacy formanaging maternal hypotension and their effects on neonatal outcome in women having spinal anaesthesiafor caesarean delivery.\\nSummary: One hundred and sixty-seven (167) healthy patients, aged between 20 to 40 years, undergoingelective caesarean section under subarachnoid block (SAB) were assessed to determine maternalhaemodynamic changes and neonatal Apgar score. Among the 167 patients, sixty (60) patients developedhypotension; These 60 patients were divided into two groups.In Group A (n=26), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased 83.56 (±4.84) mm Hg and Ephedrine wasgiven in 5 mg increments to maintain SBP > 90 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also reduced to61.26 (±4.94) mm Hg from its baseline value of 76.24 (±7.35) mm Hg and following Ephedrine therapy itrestored toward baseline value, 70.32 (±5.67). In Group B (n=27), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased84.12 (±4.36) mm Hg and Epinephrine was given in 20 μgm increments to maintain SBP > 90 mm Hg.Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also reduced to 62.19 (±4.78) mm Hg from its baseline value of 74.94(±7.05) mm Hg and following Epinephrine therapy it remained close to the value obtained duringhypotension, 63.06 (±3.59). Both the vasopressors restored the heart rate (HR) towards normal like 78.43(±7.35), & 82.85 (±5.68) from 108.24 (±8.45) & 109.34 (±11.04) beats/min, during hypotension by intravenousephedrine and epinephrine respectively.\\nConclusion: Use of Ephedrine and Epinephrine for the management of maternal hypotension doesn’taffect the neonatal outcome; neonatal Apgar score remains satisfactory. Epinephrine causes promptrestoration of systolic blood pressure towards baseline but doesn’t increase the diastolic blood pressure,thus may compromise the coronary perfusion. On the other hand, Ephedrine increases both systolic &diastolic blood pressure and to be used routinely for the management of hypotension during caesareansection under subarachnoid block.\\nJBSA 2017; 30(2): 53-65\",\"PeriodicalId\":17242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

剖宫产是产科常见的手术,通常采用蛛网膜下腔阻滞(脊髓麻醉)。脊柱麻醉用于剖宫产的主要优点是其简单、快速、可靠和最小的胎儿暴露于抑制剂药物。产妇保持清醒,将误吸的危险降到最低。低血压仍然是剖宫产脊髓麻醉最常见的并发症。它可能对母亲和新生儿都有不利影响;这些影响包括伴有窒息应激和胎儿酸中毒的胎儿氧合受损,以及母亲心输出量低的症状,如恶心、呕吐、头晕和意识受损。2过度低血压可能导致心肌和脑缺血,并与新生儿酸血症有关应避免持续超过2分钟的低血压,因为这可能与较低的Apgar评分有关。剖宫产脊柱麻醉后低血压的发生率高达80%,未采取预防措施建议降低低血压发生率的措施包括:用1000-1500 ml乳酸林格氏液预水化和麻醉期间保持左子宫移位。尽管有这些保守的措施,血管加压药物通常是必需的。在这种情况下,通常推荐的药物是麻黄碱,它可以有效地恢复母体低血压后的动脉压。尽管麻黄碱作为产科麻醉首选血管加压剂已被广泛接受,但其优于其他血管加压剂的优势尚未得到明确界定,其地位也受到质疑,因为其潜在的并发症包括室上性心动过速、速反应和胎儿酸中毒。此外,当血压下降幅度较大时,麻黄素不能立即起作用;在这种情况下,肾上腺素作为血管加压剂是恢复母体动脉压的更好选择,因为它起效快,作用强,不会表现出快速反应。本研究评估麻黄碱和肾上腺素在治疗产妇低血压的疗效上是否存在差异,以及它们对剖宫产脊髓麻醉妇女新生儿结局的影响。摘要:167例健康患者,年龄在20 - 40岁之间,在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)下择期剖宫产,评估产妇血流动力学变化和新生儿Apgar评分。167例患者中,60例出现低血压;60例患者分为两组。在A组(n=26),收缩压(SBP)下降83.56(±4.84)mm Hg,并以5 mg增量给予麻黄碱维持收缩压> 90 mm Hg,舒张压(DBP)也从其基线值76.24(±7.35)mm Hg降至61.26(±4.94)mm Hg,经麻黄碱治疗后恢复到基线值70.32(±5.67)。B组(27例)患者收缩压(SBP)降低84.12(±4.36)mm Hg,以20 μgm增量给予肾上腺素维持SBP > 90 mm Hg,舒张压(DBP)也从基线值74.94(±7.05)mm Hg降至62.19(±4.78)mm Hg,经肾上腺素治疗后仍接近低血压时的63.06(±3.59)mm Hg。在静脉注射麻黄碱和肾上腺素降压时,两种抗利尿药分别使心率(HR)从108.24(±8.45)和109.34(±11.04)次/分恢复到78.43(±7.35)和82.85(±5.68)。结论:使用麻黄碱和肾上腺素治疗低血压对新生儿结局无影响;新生儿Apgar评分仍令人满意。肾上腺素使收缩压迅速恢复到基线水平,但不会使舒张压升高,因此可能损害冠状动脉灌注。另一方面,麻黄碱可增加收缩压和舒张压,可常规用于蛛网膜下腔阻滞下剖宫产术中低血压的治疗。JBSA 2017;30 (2): 53 - 65
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Ephedrine and Epinephrine in the Management of Hypotension after Sub-Arachnoid Block (SAB) in Caesarean Section
Introduction: Caesarean section is a common operation in obstetrics and usually performed by subarachnoidblock (spinal anaesthesia). The principal advantages of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean deliveryare its simplicity, speed, reliability, & minimal foetal exposure to depressant drugs. The parturient remainsawake, & the hazards of aspiration are minimized.1Hypotension remains the most common complication associated with spinal anaesthesia for caesareandelivery. It can have detrimental effect on both mother & neonate ; these effects include impaired foetaloxygenation with asphyxial stress & foetal acidosis, & maternal symptoms of low cardiac output , suchas nausea, vomiting, dizziness, & impaired consciousness .2 Excessive hypotension may potentially producemyocardial and cerebral ischaemia, and is associated with neonatal acidaemia.3 Maternal hypotensionlasting more than 2 minutes should be avoided , as it may be associated with lower Apgar scores.1Hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section has an incidence up to 80% without prophylacticmanagement.4 Recommended measures to decrease the incidence of hypotension include pre-hydrationwith 1000-1500 ml of lactated Ringer’s solution & maintaining left uterine displacement duringanaesthesia.1Despite these conservative measures, a vasopressor drug is often required. The drug usually recommendedin this context is ephedrine, which is effective in restoring maternal arterial pressure after hypotension.2Despite the wide acceptance of ephedrine as the vasopressor of choice for obstetric anaesthesia5, itssuperiority over other vasopressors has not been clearly defined and its position has been challengedbecause of potential complications that include supraventricular tachycardia, tachyphylaxis and foetalacidosis.6,7Moreover, when the fall of blood pressure is much greater, ephedrine does not exhibit prompt effect; inthat case, epinephrine would be the better option as a vasopressor agent in restoring maternal arterialpressure as because it is very quick on onset & very potent on action and does not exhibit tachyphylaxis.This study assesses whether the use of Ephedrine and Epinephrine are different in their efficacy formanaging maternal hypotension and their effects on neonatal outcome in women having spinal anaesthesiafor caesarean delivery. Summary: One hundred and sixty-seven (167) healthy patients, aged between 20 to 40 years, undergoingelective caesarean section under subarachnoid block (SAB) were assessed to determine maternalhaemodynamic changes and neonatal Apgar score. Among the 167 patients, sixty (60) patients developedhypotension; These 60 patients were divided into two groups.In Group A (n=26), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased 83.56 (±4.84) mm Hg and Ephedrine wasgiven in 5 mg increments to maintain SBP > 90 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also reduced to61.26 (±4.94) mm Hg from its baseline value of 76.24 (±7.35) mm Hg and following Ephedrine therapy itrestored toward baseline value, 70.32 (±5.67). In Group B (n=27), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased84.12 (±4.36) mm Hg and Epinephrine was given in 20 μgm increments to maintain SBP > 90 mm Hg.Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also reduced to 62.19 (±4.78) mm Hg from its baseline value of 74.94(±7.05) mm Hg and following Epinephrine therapy it remained close to the value obtained duringhypotension, 63.06 (±3.59). Both the vasopressors restored the heart rate (HR) towards normal like 78.43(±7.35), & 82.85 (±5.68) from 108.24 (±8.45) & 109.34 (±11.04) beats/min, during hypotension by intravenousephedrine and epinephrine respectively. Conclusion: Use of Ephedrine and Epinephrine for the management of maternal hypotension doesn’taffect the neonatal outcome; neonatal Apgar score remains satisfactory. Epinephrine causes promptrestoration of systolic blood pressure towards baseline but doesn’t increase the diastolic blood pressure,thus may compromise the coronary perfusion. On the other hand, Ephedrine increases both systolic &diastolic blood pressure and to be used routinely for the management of hypotension during caesareansection under subarachnoid block. JBSA 2017; 30(2): 53-65
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信