创伤的社会学理论:当代理论社会学的话语

S. Kravchenko
{"title":"创伤的社会学理论:当代理论社会学的话语","authors":"S. Kravchenko","doi":"10.31857/S013216250009131-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In historical and cultural context there are critically analyzed approaches to different manifestations of traumatic development and the very idea of social trauma. P. Sztompka’s theory of becoming displays how the effects of “society in action” and “pathological agencies” cause sociocultural traumas. J.C. Alexander’s theory of cultural construction of trauma and “the dramatization of consciousness” diagnoses the role of artificially constructed short living mystified meanings in the deformation of social consciousness. In the paper special attention is given to the analysis of Zh.T. Toschenko’s theory of ‘the society of trauma’ that suggests and argues for a new specific modality of development. It is shown that with the help of theoretical and methodological tools of this theory there are revalued traditional criteria of the progress of the countries that earlier were defined as “developed”, “developing”, “catching up”, “backward” that did not take into consideration traumatic features of “non-stable states” – their realities and trends of development do not dovetail either with evolution or with revolution modality. Relying on the postulates and conclusions of this theory the author of the paper proposes further investigations into the issues of society of trauma.","PeriodicalId":85741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sociological studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"60-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociological Theories of Trauma: Discourse in Contemporary Theoretical Sociology\",\"authors\":\"S. Kravchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/S013216250009131-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In historical and cultural context there are critically analyzed approaches to different manifestations of traumatic development and the very idea of social trauma. P. Sztompka’s theory of becoming displays how the effects of “society in action” and “pathological agencies” cause sociocultural traumas. J.C. Alexander’s theory of cultural construction of trauma and “the dramatization of consciousness” diagnoses the role of artificially constructed short living mystified meanings in the deformation of social consciousness. In the paper special attention is given to the analysis of Zh.T. Toschenko’s theory of ‘the society of trauma’ that suggests and argues for a new specific modality of development. It is shown that with the help of theoretical and methodological tools of this theory there are revalued traditional criteria of the progress of the countries that earlier were defined as “developed”, “developing”, “catching up”, “backward” that did not take into consideration traumatic features of “non-stable states” – their realities and trends of development do not dovetail either with evolution or with revolution modality. Relying on the postulates and conclusions of this theory the author of the paper proposes further investigations into the issues of society of trauma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of sociological studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"60-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of sociological studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009131-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sociological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009131-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在历史和文化背景下,对创伤发展的不同表现形式和社会创伤的概念有批判性的分析方法。P. Sztompka的成长理论展示了“行动中的社会”和“病态代理”是如何造成社会文化创伤的。亚历山大的创伤文化建构理论和“意识的戏剧化”理论诊断了人为建构的短暂生命的神秘意义在社会意识变形中的作用。本文着重分析了Zh.T。托申科的“创伤社会”理论提出并论证了一种新的特定发展模式。本文表明,在这一理论的理论和方法工具的帮助下,重新评估了以前被定义为“发达”、“发展中”、“追赶”、“落后”的国家的传统进步标准,这些标准没有考虑到“不稳定状态”的创伤性特征- -它们的现实和发展趋势既不符合进化,也不符合革命模式。根据这一理论的假设和结论,作者提出了对创伤社会问题的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociological Theories of Trauma: Discourse in Contemporary Theoretical Sociology
In historical and cultural context there are critically analyzed approaches to different manifestations of traumatic development and the very idea of social trauma. P. Sztompka’s theory of becoming displays how the effects of “society in action” and “pathological agencies” cause sociocultural traumas. J.C. Alexander’s theory of cultural construction of trauma and “the dramatization of consciousness” diagnoses the role of artificially constructed short living mystified meanings in the deformation of social consciousness. In the paper special attention is given to the analysis of Zh.T. Toschenko’s theory of ‘the society of trauma’ that suggests and argues for a new specific modality of development. It is shown that with the help of theoretical and methodological tools of this theory there are revalued traditional criteria of the progress of the countries that earlier were defined as “developed”, “developing”, “catching up”, “backward” that did not take into consideration traumatic features of “non-stable states” – their realities and trends of development do not dovetail either with evolution or with revolution modality. Relying on the postulates and conclusions of this theory the author of the paper proposes further investigations into the issues of society of trauma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信