混合式学习方式对马德拉萨学生英语写作错误的影响?比较研究

M. Usama
{"title":"混合式学习方式对马德拉萨学生英语写作错误的影响?比较研究","authors":"M. Usama","doi":"10.22161/ijaers.103.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies analyzed errors in English as a second language writing in school or university; no work has been conducted on Indian Madrasa (Islamic institution) students’ errors in English writing. The current study analyzes Madrasa students’ English writing errors. The students were grouped into an experimental group (EG) and control group (CG) and engaged for twenty-eight days, where only EG learners received blended learning (BL) treatment. The investigation used a pre-and post-test purposive design across all the groups. The errors were spotted from their write-ups belonging to morphological, syntactical, and orthographical categories. Next, errors were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Though the results revealed that both groups committed errors in all seven categories: morphological (article and preposition), syntactical (tense and word order), and orthographic (capitalization, spelling, and punctuation) types, EG’s errors were fewer than CG’s. This implies that BL can lead to effective remedial writing in Madrasa classrooms. In addition, EG’s pre-test scores were also greater than post-test scores, which has implications for adopting BL at different Madaris in India.","PeriodicalId":13758,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Blended Learning Approach Affect Madrasa Students English Writing Errors? A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Usama\",\"doi\":\"10.22161/ijaers.103.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous studies analyzed errors in English as a second language writing in school or university; no work has been conducted on Indian Madrasa (Islamic institution) students’ errors in English writing. The current study analyzes Madrasa students’ English writing errors. The students were grouped into an experimental group (EG) and control group (CG) and engaged for twenty-eight days, where only EG learners received blended learning (BL) treatment. The investigation used a pre-and post-test purposive design across all the groups. The errors were spotted from their write-ups belonging to morphological, syntactical, and orthographical categories. Next, errors were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Though the results revealed that both groups committed errors in all seven categories: morphological (article and preposition), syntactical (tense and word order), and orthographic (capitalization, spelling, and punctuation) types, EG’s errors were fewer than CG’s. This implies that BL can lead to effective remedial writing in Madrasa classrooms. In addition, EG’s pre-test scores were also greater than post-test scores, which has implications for adopting BL at different Madaris in India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.103.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.103.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以前的研究分析了英语作为第二语言在学校或大学写作中的错误;目前还没有针对印度伊斯兰学校学生英语写作错误的研究。本研究分析了伊斯兰学校学生的英语写作错误。学生被分为实验组(EG)和对照组(CG),为期28天,其中只有EG学习者接受混合学习(BL)治疗。调查在所有组中使用了测试前和测试后的目的设计。这些错误是从他们写的属于词法、句法和正字法范畴的文章中发现的。然后,对误差进行定量和定性分析。尽管结果显示两组在所有七个类别中都犯了错误:形态学(冠词和介词)、句法(时态和词序)和正字法(大写、拼写和标点)类型,但EG的错误比CG的少。这意味着,在伊斯兰学校的课堂上,BL可以导致有效的补习写作。此外,EG的测试前得分也高于测试后得分,这对在印度不同的Madaris采用BL有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Blended Learning Approach Affect Madrasa Students English Writing Errors? A Comparative Study
Previous studies analyzed errors in English as a second language writing in school or university; no work has been conducted on Indian Madrasa (Islamic institution) students’ errors in English writing. The current study analyzes Madrasa students’ English writing errors. The students were grouped into an experimental group (EG) and control group (CG) and engaged for twenty-eight days, where only EG learners received blended learning (BL) treatment. The investigation used a pre-and post-test purposive design across all the groups. The errors were spotted from their write-ups belonging to morphological, syntactical, and orthographical categories. Next, errors were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Though the results revealed that both groups committed errors in all seven categories: morphological (article and preposition), syntactical (tense and word order), and orthographic (capitalization, spelling, and punctuation) types, EG’s errors were fewer than CG’s. This implies that BL can lead to effective remedial writing in Madrasa classrooms. In addition, EG’s pre-test scores were also greater than post-test scores, which has implications for adopting BL at different Madaris in India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信