为国家服务的人类学:CSIC“Bernardino de sahagun”研究所(1941-1970)

Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares Pub Date : 2020-04-15 DOI:10.3989/RDTP.1992.V47.I1.241

Luis Ángel Sánchez Gómez

{"title":"为国家服务的人类学:CSIC“Bernardino de sahagun”研究所(1941-1970)","authors":"Luis Ángel Sánchez Gómez","doi":"10.3989/RDTP.1992.V47.I1.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lnstitute «Bernardino de Sahagun», of the High Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), was the main official center for research in anthropology and ethnology during the Franco periord. This paper analyzes the main lines of enquiry laid clown by its director J. Perez de Barradas, and the political and ideological constrains that led CSIC's cultural anthropology to a deadlock.","PeriodicalId":30257,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","volume":"9 1","pages":"29-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La antropología al servicio del Estado: El Instituto «Bernardino de Sahagún» del CSIC (1941-1970)\",\"authors\":\"Luis Ángel Sánchez Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/RDTP.1992.V47.I1.241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lnstitute «Bernardino de Sahagun», of the High Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), was the main official center for research in anthropology and ethnology during the Franco periord. This paper analyzes the main lines of enquiry laid clown by its director J. Perez de Barradas, and the political and ideological constrains that led CSIC's cultural anthropology to a deadlock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"29-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1992.V47.I1.241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1992.V47.I1.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

隶属于科学研究高级委员会(CSIC)的Bernardino de Sahagun研究所是佛朗哥时期人类学和民族学研究的主要官方中心。本文分析了该研究所所长巴拉达斯所提出的主要研究思路，以及导致CSIC文化人类学研究陷入僵局的政治和意识形态制约。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

La antropología al servicio del Estado: El Instituto «Bernardino de Sahagún» del CSIC (1941-1970)

The lnstitute «Bernardino de Sahagun», of the High Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), was the main official center for research in anthropology and ethnology during the Franco periord. This paper analyzes the main lines of enquiry laid clown by its director J. Perez de Barradas, and the political and ideological constrains that led CSIC's cultural anthropology to a deadlock.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Established in 1944, Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares is presently the longest standing Spanish Journal devoted to social and cultural anthropology, publishing scholarly work on human matters such as mentalities, religion, kinship, social relationships and representations, material culture, oral literature, dialectal lexicon and all other related subjects of anthropological research. Regular sections include major Articles, Notes, Archival Documents and Book Reviews. Aimed at a learned readership, it publishes original contributions to anthropological knowledge while enriching scholarly debate, especially on theoretical and methodological questions as well as on ethnographic fieldwork.